Click here to purge this page

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice will be automatically removed by RMCD bot (talk) when the backlog is cleared.

Requested moves is a process for requesting the retitling (moving) of an article, template, or project page on Wikipedia. For information on retitling files, categories, and other items, see § When not to use this page.

Before moving a page or requesting a move, please review the article titling policy and the guidelines on primary topics.

Any autoconfirmed user can move a page using the "Move" option in the editing toolbar; see how to move a page for more information. If you have no reason to expect a dispute concerning a move, be bold and move the page; however, it may not always be possible or desirable to do this:

• Technical reasons may prevent a move; for example, a page may already exist at the target title and require deletion, or the page may be protected from moves. In such cases, see § Requesting technical moves.
• Requests to revert recent, undiscussed, controversial moves may be made at WP:RM/TR. If the new name has not become the stable title, the undiscussed move will be reverted. If the new name has become the stable title, a requested move will be needed to determine the article's proper location.
• A title may be disputed, and discussion may be necessary to reach consensus: see § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. The requested moves process is not mandatory, and sometimes an informal discussion at the article's talk page can help reach consensus.
• A page should not be moved and a new move discussion should not be opened when there is already an open move request on a talk page. Instead, please participate in the open discussion.
• Unregistered and new (not yet autoconfirmed) users are unable to move pages.

Requests are typically processed after seven days. If consensus supports the move at or after this time, a reviewer will perform it. If there is a consensus not to move the page, the request will be closed as "not moved". When consensus remains unclear, the request may be relisted to allow more time, or closed as "no consensus". See Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions for more details on the process.

Wikipedia:Move review can be used to contest the outcome of a move request as long as all steps are followed. If a discussion on the closer's talk page does not resolve an issue, then a move review will evaluate the close of the move discussion to determine whether or not the contested close was reasonable and consistent with the spirit and intent of common practice, policies, and guidelines.

Separate processes exist for moving certain types of pages, and for changes other than page moves:

• Making an uncontroversial move – if you can, be bold and do it yourself! If you can't, see § Requesting technical moves.
• Renaming a category – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.
• Renaming a stub template – propose the move at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion (because stub templates apply an equivalent category).
• Renaming an image or other file – see Wikipedia:Moving a page § Moving a file page.
• Moves from draft namespace or user space to article space – Unconfirmed users: use the submission wizard. See Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Confirmed users: Move the page yourself.
• Merging two articles – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers, or be bold and do it yourself.
• Splitting an article – make a request at Wikipedia:Proposed article splits, or be bold and do it yourself.
• Requesting that page histories be merged – list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge.
• Contesting a move request close – use the Wikipedia:Move review process.

Autoconfirmed editors may move a page without discussion if all of the following apply:

• No article exists at the new target title;
• There has been no previous discussion about the title of the page that expressed any objection to a new title; and
• It seems unlikely that anyone would reasonably disagree with the move.

If you disagree with a prior bold move, and the new title has not been in place for a long time, you may revert the move yourself. If you cannot revert the move for technical reasons, then you may request a technical move.

Move wars are disruptive, so if you make a bold move and it is reverted, do not make the move again. Instead, follow the procedures laid out in § Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves.

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request a technical move below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.

• If this is your first article and you want your draft article moved to the mainspace, please use the submission wizard to submit your draft or user sandbox page for review at Articles for creation instead of listing it here.
• Because you are autoconfirmed, you can move most pages yourself. Do not request technical assistance on this page if you can do it yourself.
• If you need help determining whether it's okay to move the page to a different title, then please follow the instructions at the top of Wikipedia:Requested moves.

• Please make sure you really need technical assistance before making a request here. In particular, if the target page is a redirect back to the source page that has only one revision, you can usually move the page normally.
• To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
  

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
• To request a reversion of a recent undiscussed move: Review the guidelines at WP:RMUM of whether a reversion of an undiscussed move qualifies as uncontroversial and if so, edit the Requests to revert undiscussed moves subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

  {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
  

  This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page. Note that in some cases, clerks, such as administrators or page movers may determine that your request for a reversion does not pass the criteria and may move the request to the contested section or open a formal requested move discussion for potentially controversial moves on your behalf.
• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
• If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page. A bot will automatically remove contested requests after 72 hours of inactivity.

• LSD (Cardiacs album) → LSD (album)LSD (album) (currently a redirect instead to LSD (disambiguation)#Albums) (move · discuss) – Seems to be the only album on Wikipedia named LSD, so the "Cardiacs" bit is unnecessary. – [ɑƞʈuɼeđ] [⍣] [⁂] 00:43, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  What about Labrinth,_Sia_&_Diplo_Present..._LSD? Sir Joseph ^(talk) 00:58, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  That one isn't just titled LSD. – [ɑƞʈuɼeđ] [⍣] [⁂] — Preceding undated comment added 07:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  @Sir Joseph WP:NCMDAB doesn't say anything about this, but I'm inclined to move this with a hatnote per antured (that it's not just titled that). HurricaneZeta^C 16:28, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  that makes perfect sense. Thanks. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 16:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose. Labrinth, Sia & Diplo Present... LSD is obviously ambiguous here. 162 etc. (talk) 23:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Note also that LSD (LSD album) is the consensus title for that one per a 2023 RM. It was moved to the WP:NATURAL title without discussion in 2024. 162 etc. (talk) 23:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  We have a similar situation with Disambiguation (Pandelis Karayorgis and Mat Maneri album) and Ø (Disambiguation). Both are simply referred to as Disambiguation, so it is possibly the reason why the former needs the specific artists in the qualifier. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) 23:45, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Cover symbols → Cover symbolCover symbol (currently a redirect back to Cover symbols) (move · discuss) – per WP:SINGULAR Nardog (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Bhubaneswar Tejas Rajdhani Express → Bhubaneswar Rajdhani ExpressBhubaneswar Rajdhani Express (currently a redirect back to Bhubaneswar Tejas Rajdhani Express) (move · discuss) – page has been repeatedly moved without explanation or sourcing, against established longterm title  — Amakuru (talk) 17:49, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rohann333 Can you explain your reason for moving the page? HurricaneZeta^C 18:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Lubbock Christian Chaparrals Women's Basketball → Lubbock Christian Lady Chaps basketballLubbock Christian Lady Chaps basketball (currently a redirect instead to Lubbock Christian Chaparrals and Lady Chaps) (move · discuss) – redirect blocking move Jweiss11 (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  No reason to rename this has been provided. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:32, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Warrior II (game) → Warrior IIWarrior II (currently a redirect instead to Virabhadrasana) (move · discuss) – The yoga pose is commonly known as "Warrior II Pose" and not necessarily just "Warrior II". This requires a full move discussion. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:57, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  The title was a redirect for the yoga pose from 2011 until 22 January this year so the status quo is for the yoga pose to be primary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:03, 28 January 2026 (UTC) @Zxcvbnm and Chiswick Chap: who moved it to restore the redirect. This probably should go to a full RM after the AFD has finished. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't think there is a "status quo" because the article didn't even exist at that point. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 00:00, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Graylyn → Graylyn EstateGraylyn Estate (currently a redirect back to Graylyn) (move · discuss) – This is the full name of the facility. Assadzadeh (talk) 18:11, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Assadzadeh Contesting this since I do not think the full name is needed. Graylyn is used in more of the sources (WP:COMMONNAME), and I don't think it should be made more ambiguous (in violation of WP:CONCISE) to the Australian one. HurricaneZeta^C 18:13, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then it should be changed to Graylyn Estate (Winston-Salem, North Carolina) to distinguish it from the Australian winery. Assadzadeh (talk) 18:37, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note the spelling here: Graylyn Estate and Gralyn Estate are distinct. I've made some edits here which make any further disambiguation unnecessary. 162 etc. (talk) 23:06, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Overlooked that minor spelling change again. However my main point with WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE still stands. HurricaneZeta^C 15:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Hunter-gatherer → Hunter–gathererHunter–gatherer (currently a redirect back to Hunter-gatherer) (move · discuss) – Typo: hyphen to en dash for disjunction Stephan Leeds (talk) 07:06, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Contesting: I think this is closer to the "singer-songwriter" example at MOS:ENBETWEEN than anything else. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

    A singer-songwriter is a single person that is both. A hunter–gatherer culture includes both people who hunt and people who gather; it does not by definition include any person who is both. Stephan Leeds (talk) 10:54, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  I concur with EW. Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 09:45, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  "Singer-songwriter" seems like a good example. An individual person can be called a "hunter-gatherer", which implies that this one person is involved in both activities (or at least is part of a group that is involved with both activities). It also seems unlikely that a person who went out on a hunting excursion would ignore the opportunity to gather a bounty instead if the opportunity presents itself, or vice-versa – if you're out gathering root vegetables and encounter some suitable prey animals, I'm pretty sure you'd be happy to switch to a hunting activity. Note that the opening sentence of the article says that the subject is a single individual person. While some groups may separate the roles, that does not seem like a generally dominant or defining practice. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:35, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• New Yorker Lions → Braunschweig LionsBraunschweig Lions (currently a redirect back to New Yorker Lions) (move · discuss) – The team changed its name back. GregorBungensheim (talk) 07:28, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@GregorBungensheim Please see WP:NAMECHANGES. Moving to contested considering the original name change was over 15 years ago. Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 09:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The name changed 15 years ago due to sponsorship. Last year, the sponsorship ended, so the team reverted to its original, non-sponsored name. See official page, GFL News. GregorBungensheim (talk) 12:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My point still stands. To quote directly from the policy I linked above, If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. If, on the other hand, reliable sources written after the name change is announced continue to use the established name when discussing the article topic in the present day, Wikipedia should continue to do so as well (emphasis is original). Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 04:50, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Epworth, Lincolnshire → Epworth, North LincolnshireEpworth, North Lincolnshire (currently a redirect back to Epworth, Lincolnshire) (move · discuss) – Epworth is not in the county of Lincolnshire, it is in the county of North Lincolnshire, a completely separate unitary authority ~2026-55937-2 (talk) 13:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, this isn't uncontroversial. Epworth is in the ceremonial county of Lincolnshire, and in the unitary authority of North Lincolnshire. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-55937-2 Per WP:ENGPLACE, [[placename, ceremonial county]] should be used. Epworth is in the ceremonial county of Lincolnshire so it shouldn't be moved. echidnalives - talk - edits 14:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It's the only 1 in Lincolnshire therefore the ceremonial county will do unlike Holme, North Lincolnshire/Holme, West Lindsey. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Plan Toys → PlanToysPlanToys (currently a redirect back to Plan Toys) (move · discuss) – The brand name is actually written as PlanToys, without a space. Thanks! WikiTributor2026 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Please see my answer at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Request to change title name. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 22:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiTributor2026 Yeah I agree too, the sources all use Plan Toys. HurricaneZeta^C 22:58, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The website itself uses PlanToys, including stating the company name as PlanToys Inc. within the copyright notice. Are they not the utmost authority on their own name? I suppose one could argue in favor of the official incorporation documentation if it can be located, but I suspect it would be the same. Per WP:PRIMARY: "A primary source may be used on Wikipedia only to make straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge."

https://www.plantoys.com/pages/about-us ChompyTheGogoat (talk) 23:11, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Explained my rationale for this at the Teahouse: [1] HurricaneZeta^C 23:32, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Sanders Institute → The Sanders InstituteThe Sanders Institute (currently a redirect back to Sanders Institute) (move · discuss) – The group's social media and website have now begun to use "The Sanders Institute", including in their copyright declarations. The latter is currently a redirect to the actual page, should be swapped. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC) aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Aesurias I'm not sure this meets WP:THE. Looking through the references and even the press releases on their own website, the usage of a capital "the" isn't consistent. This argument would be best presented in a full RM. cyberdog958^Talk 00:31, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Draft:How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2027 film) → How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2027 film)How to Train Your Dragon 2 (2027 film) (currently a redirect instead to How to Train Your Dragon (2025 film)#Sequel) (move · discuss) – filming began today KingArti (talk) 22:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

  Probably best to wait for the review first. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 23:35, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Swachh Bharat Mission → Clean India MissionClean India Mission (currently a redirect back to Swachh Bharat Mission) (move · discuss) – The page was moved from Clean India mission in 2016, however a discussion from 2023 requested to move it back, and the concensus was to move Robloxguest3 (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Well, "concensus [sic] was to move" means one person suggested moving the article. JBW (talk) 19:33, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also for the record, there was no consensus since nobody ever replied (a formal RM was not created), although in saying that, nobody objected either. I do think a proper RM needs to happen though. Aydoh8^{[what have I done now?]} 16:22, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Mangue bit → ManguebeatManguebeat (currently a redirect back to Mangue bit) (move · discuss) – WP:PRECISE name of the gender. Svartner (talk) 20:44, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Svartner I moved this but a 2005 discussion on the talk page says Manguebeat is a misspelling, so I reverted this to ask here. It cites two dead links, but do you have any further rationale for moving the page? HurricaneZeta^C 16:29, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth, I think Manguebeat is the WP:COMMONNAME but the 2005 discussion technically counted as a contest of this move (WP:PCM can't be done through WP:RMTR). HurricaneZeta^C 16:37, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Struer, Denmark → Struer (move · discuss) – As with Dawiki and standard naming, other uses are things associated with the place or PTMs. The DAB should be moved to Struer (disambiguation). Crouch, Swale (talk) 06:47, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Crouch, Swale I think this is still a primary topic grab due to Struer (nomination district). HurricaneZeta^C 16:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@HurricaneZeta: The district appears to also be associated with the settlement and is in Denmark anyway so the current title doesn't disambiguate from that anyway. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:42, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley (Scottish Parliament constituency) → Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley (move · discuss) – Removing unnecessary disambiguation per WP:NCUKPARL and the RfC consensus. Surtsicna (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Surtsicna This is a primary topic grab (though I don't think that was your intention) due to Carrick, Cumnock and Doon Valley (UK Parliament constituency). The disambiguator is in fact needed because of that. HurricaneZeta^C 16:34, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Template:NoToC/doc → Template:No ToC/doc (move · discuss) – Doc template (without space) only called by one single doc page (with space). If moved, the new page needs to be updated to substitute the one parameter. — Peterwhy (talk) 23:00, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Peterwhy We can't move over pages. A merge needs to be done. Tenshi! (Talk page) 23:12, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. A move is potentially controversial if either of the following applies:

• there has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
• someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

Use this process if there is any reason to believe a move would be contested. For technical move requests, such as to correct obvious typographical errors, see Requesting technical moves. The technical moves procedure can also be used for uncontroversial moves when the requested title is occupied by an existing article.

Do not create a new move request when one is already open on the same talk page. Instead, consider contributing to the open discussion if you would like to propose another alternative. Multiple closed move requests may be on the same page, but each should have a unique section heading.

Do not create a move request to rename one or more redirects. Redirects cannot be used as current titles in requested moves.

To request a single page move, click on the "Add topic" (or "New section") tab of the talk page of the article you want moved, without adding a new subject/header, inserting this code:

{{subst:requested move|New name|reason=Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.}}

Replace New name with the requested new name of the page (or with a simple question mark, if you want more than one possible new name to be considered). The template will automatically create the heading "Requested move 29 January 2026" and sign the post for you.

There is no need to edit the article in question. Once the above code is added to the Talk page, a bot will automatically add the following notification at the top of the affected page:

A request that this page title be changed is under discussion. Please do not move this page until the discussion is closed.

Unlike other request processes on Wikipedia, such as Requests for comment, nominations need not be neutral. Make your point as best you can; use evidence (such as Google Ngrams and pageview statistics) and refer to applicable policies and guidelines, especially our article titling policy and the guideline on disambiguation and primary topics.

WikiProjects may subscribe to Article alerts to receive RM notifications. For example, Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Article alerts/Requested moves is transcluded to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography. RMCD bot notifies many of the other Wikiprojects listed on the talk page of the article to be moved to invite project members to participate in the RM discussion. Requesters should feel free to notify any other Wikiproject or noticeboard that might be interested in the move request, as long as this notification is neutral.

Occasionally, a move request must be made on a talk page other than the talk page of the page to be moved. For example, a request to rename Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Resources to Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing and templates would need to take place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation because the talk page of the project page to be moved, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Resources, is a redirect to that centralized discussion page. In this type of case, the requested move should be made using the following code:

{{subst:requested move|reason=(the reason for the page move goes here).|current1=(present title of page to be renamed)|new1=(proposed title of page)}}

The |1= unnamed parameter is not used. The |current1= and |new1= parameters are used similar to multiple page moves described below.

A single template may be used to request multiple related moves. On one of the talk pages of the affected pages, create a request and format it as below. A sample request for three page moves is shown here (for two page moves, omit the lines for current3 and new3). For four page moves, add lines for current4 and new4, and so on. There is no technical limit on the number of multiple move requests, but before requesting very large multi-moves, consider whether a naming convention should be changed first. Discuss that change on the talk page for the naming convention, e.g., Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (sportspeople).

To request a multiple page move, edit at the bottom of the talk page of the article you chose for your request, without adding a new header, inserting this code:

{{subst:requested move
| current1 = Current title of page 1 (this parameter can be omitted for discussions hosted on a page that is proposed to be moved)
| new1     = New title for page 1 with the talk page hosting this discussion
| current2 = Current title of page 2
| new2     = New title for page 2
| current3 = Current title of page 3
| new3     = New title for page 3
| reason   = Place here your rationale for the proposed page name change, referring to applicable naming convention policies and guidelines, and providing evidence in support. If your reasoning includes search engine results, please prioritize searches limited to reliable sources (e.g. books, news, scholarly papers) over other web results. You don't need to add your signature at the end, as this template will do so automatically.
}}

For example, to propose moving the articles Wikipedia and Wiki, put this template on Talk:Wikipedia with current1 set to Wikipedia and current2 set to Wiki. The discussion for all affected articles is held on the talk page of the article where the template is placed (Talk:Wikipedia). Do not sign the request with ~~~~, since the template does this automatically (so if you sign it yourself there will be two copies of your signature at the end of the request). Do not skip pairs of numbers.

RMCD bot automatically places a notice section on the talk page of all pages that are included in your request except the one hosting the discussion, to call attention to the move discussion that is in progress and to suggest that all discussion for all of the pages included in the request should take place at that one hosting location.

For multi-move discussions hosted on a page which is itself proposed to be moved, it is not necessary to include the |current1=Current title of page 1 for the page hosting the discussion, as its current title can be inferred automatically. Occasionally the discussions for significant multi-move requests may be hosted on WikiProject talk pages or other pages in Project namespace, in which case it is necessary to include |current1= to indicate the first article to be moved.

If you have to update a RM from a single move to multiple moves, you need to add the following parameters to the {{requested move/dated}} template call:

• |multiple=yes
• |current1=Current title of page 1

Please list every move that you wish to have made in your request. For example, if you wish to move Cricket (disambiguation) to Cricket because you do not believe the sport is the primary topic for the search term "Cricket", then you actually want to move two pages, both Cricket (disambiguation) and Cricket. Thus you must list proposed titles for each page affected by your request. For example, you might propose:

• Cricket → Cricket (sport)Cricket (sport)
• Cricket (disambiguation) → Cricket

If a new title is not proposed for the sport, it is more difficult to achieve consensus for a new title for that article. A move request that does not show what to do with the material at its proposed target, such as:

• Cricket (disambiguation) → Cricket

is incomplete. Such requests may be completed as a request to decide the best new title by discussion.

• Cricket → ?

If a disambiguation page is in the way of a move, the request may be completed as proposing to add (disambiguation).

• Example → Example (disambiguation)Example (disambiguation)

Template usage examples and notes

Talk page tag	Text that will be shown (and usage notes)
{{subst:Requested move|new|reason=why}} links talk edit	Requested move 29 January 2026 It has been proposed in this section that Wikipedia:Requested moves be renamed and moved to new. This proposal is for a cross-namespace move from Wikipedia to (Main/Article) namespace. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move Wikipedia:Requested moves → new – why Example (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Use when the proposed new title is given. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:. This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
{{subst:Requested move|?|reason=why}}	Requested move 29 January 2026 It has been proposed in this section that Wikipedia:Requested moves be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log Wikipedia:Requested moves → ? – why Example (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Use when the proposed new title is not known. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst:. This tag should be placed at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion.
{{subst:Requested move|new|reason=why|talk=yes}}	Requested move 29 January 2026 It has been proposed in this section that Wikipedia:Requested moves be renamed and moved to new. This proposal is for a cross-namespace move from Wikipedia to (Main/Article) namespace. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move Wikipedia:Requested moves → new – why Example (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2026‎ (UTC)[reply] Survey Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles. Discussion Any additional comments: This template adds subsections for survey and discussion. Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst: Click the "New Section" tab on the talk page and leave the Subject/headline blank, as the template by default automatically creates the heading.
{{subst:Requested move|new1=x|current2=y|new2=z|reason=why}}	Requested move 29 January 2026 It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move Wikipedia:Requested moves → x y → z – why Example (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Do not sign this template—this tag is auto-signed when substituted. Be sure to use the subst: and place this tag at the beginning of the section containing the relevant discussion. Add additional related move requests in pairs (|current3= and |new3=, |current4= and |new4=, etc.).
{{subst:Requested move|new1=?|current2=y|new2=?|reason=why}}	Requested move 29 January 2026 It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the names being decided below. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log Wikipedia:Requested moves → ? y → ? – why Example (talk) 05:30, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

All editors are welcome to contribute to the discussion regarding a requested page move. There are a number of standards that Wikipedians should practice in such discussions:

• When editors recommend a course of action, they write Support or Oppose in bold text, which is done by surrounding the word with three single quotes on each side, e.g. '''Support'''.
• Comments or recommendations are added on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *) and signed by adding ~~~~ to the end. Responses to another editor are threaded and indented using multiple bullets.
• The article itself should be reviewed before any recommendation is made; do not base recommendations solely on the information supplied by other editors. It may also help to look at the article's edit history. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations, as well as prior move requests. They may contain relevant arguments and useful information.
• Vested interests in the article should be disclosed per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI.

When participating, please consider the following:

• Editors should make themselves familiar with the article titling policy at Wikipedia:Article titles.
• Other important guidelines that set forth community norms for article titles include Wikipedia:Disambiguation, specific naming conventions, and the manual of style.
• The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations that are not sustained by arguments.
• Explain how the proposed article title meets or contravenes policy and guidelines rather than merely stating that it does so.
• Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.^[a]
• Do not make conflicting recommendations. If you change your mind, use strike-through to retract your previous statement by enclosing it between <s> and </s> after the bullets, and de-bold the struck words, as in "• Support Oppose".

Please remember that reasonable editors will sometimes disagree, but that arguments based in policy, guidelines, and evidence have more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers an argument that does not explain how the move request is consistent with policies and guidelines, a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion may be useful. On the other hand, a pattern of responding to requests with groundless opinion, proof by assertion, and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider using a dispute resolution process.

Any uninvolved editor in good standing may close a move request. Please read the closing instructions for information on how to close a move request. The simple guide to closing RM discussions details how to actually close a requested move discussion. Most requested moves should be open for seven days (168 hours) but can be withdrawn under specific circumstances as per WP:RMEC.

Alternatively, the opener of a discussion can close it only if unanimous opposition is obvious, the requested move has not had any comments yet, or the request was initiated via block evasion. As per WP:WITHDRAW, an opener of a discussion should use strikethrough on the nomination statement when it is prematurely closed through withdrawal.

Relisting a discussion moves the request out of the backlog up to the current day in order to encourage further input. The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion. In general, discussions should not be relisted more than once before properly closing.^[b] Users relisting a debate which has already been relisted, or relisting a debate with a substantial discussion, should write a short explanation on why they did not consider the debate sufficient to close. While there is no consensus forbidding participation in a requested move discussion after relisting it, many editors consider it an inadvisable form of supervote. If you want to relist a discussion and then participate in it, be prepared to explain why you think it was appropriate.

Relisting should be done using {{subst:RM relist}}, which automatically includes the relister's signature, and which must be placed at the very end of the initial request after the move requester's signature (and subsequent relisters' signatures).

When a relisted discussion reaches a resolution, it may be closed at any time according to the closing instructions; there is no required length of time to wait before closing a relisted discussion.

If discussion has become stale, or it seems that discussion would benefit from more input of editors versed in the subject area, consider more widely publicizing the discussion, such as by notifying WikiProjects of the discussion using the template {{RM notification}}. Banners placed at the top of the talk page hosting the move request can often be used to identify WikiProjects suitable for notification.

This section lists all requests filed or identified as potentially controversial which are currently under discussion.

Do not attempt to edit this list manually; a bot will automatically update the page soon after the {{subst:Requested move}} template is added to the discussion on the relevant talk page. The entry is removed automatically soon after the discussion is closed. To make a change to an entry, make the change on the linked talk page.

This list is also available in a page-link-first format and in table format. 74 discussions have been relisted.

• (Discuss) – Sz → SZSZ – Almost all topics listed are referred to as "SZ," not "Sz." GilaMonster536 (talk) 17:55, 21 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 04:35, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – SATENA Flight 8895 → ? – – Same example as Royal Brunei Airlines Flight 839. "8895" was from FD24, and 8849 was from official colombia government. TBB (talk) 03:05, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Galentine's Day → Galentine's Day (Parks and Recreation) – The observation is the primary meaning. Georgia guy (talk) 02:44, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Edward Jones (Canon of Windsor) → Edward Jones (canon of Windsor) – The disambiguation term here seems to define a category (i.e., canons of Windsor), and therefore to be a common noun that should not be capitalized. Alternatively, it is a title. Do we capitalize titles used as disambiguation terms? We seem to generally not ordinarily capitalize "bishop of X" as a disambiguation term, although I found 34 article titles that do. (There are 865 that don't.) Otherwise, we should capitalize the disambiguation terms of Hugh Pearson (canon of Windsor) and John Stokes (canon of Windsor). This proposed renaming would revert two moves by Steel1943 on 6 April 2020. The edit summary offered for those moves was only "Capital C", without a rationale for the choice. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 01:37, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edward Moore (Canon of Windsor) → Edward Moore (canon of Windsor)
  • John Barrow (Canon of Windsor) → John Barrow (canon of Windsor)
  • John Drury (Canon of Windsor) → John Drury (canon of Windsor)John Drury (canon of Windsor)
  • John Vaughan (Canon of Windsor) → John Vaughan (canon of Windsor)John Vaughan (canon of Windsor)
  • William Wade (Canon of Windsor) → William Wade (canon of Windsor)

• (Discuss) – United States documents leak of the War in Afghanistan → Afghan War documents leakAfghan War documents leak – This is what the first sentence of the lead calls the event. While there have been other Afghan War document leaks, the proposed title already redirects here and there is a hatnote in case of confusion. I think it clearly makes sense to go all the way with the title, for a combination of COMMONNAME and the fact that the current title is extremely cumbersome (if not downright ungrammatical). — Anonymous 01:23, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Global Connectivity Index → ? – The current article documents a specific proprietary index initiative developed and published by Huawei between 2014–2019, as reflected by its sources, methodology, and historical scope. The title "Global Connectivity Index" is generic and does not clearly distinguish this specific initiative from other uses of the term in broader connectivity or internet measurement contexts. Renaming the article would better align the title with its actual subject matter and help clarify scope for readers. ~2025-42165-26 (talk) 01:22, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Regnal years of English and British monarchs → Regnal years of monarchs in English law – See prior RM discussion. 'English and British' is confusing because the article does not cover all British monarchs. Srnec (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 17:21, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Echoism (psychology) → Echoism (trait) – The WP:MEDRS guidelines states you shouldn't portray a concept as a medical field if academic sources are not yet on board with doing so. The term psychology in the title may make the article fall foul of this guideline. ~2026-45119-6 (talk) 16:22, 21 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) 16:41, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Mexican League → ? – I can't find any sources that refer to the baseball league simply as the Mexican League. Seems confusing especially with Liga MX. I think Mexican Baseball League, would be my preferred better name, but I also think the spanish Liga Mexicana de Béisbol or LMB (baseball) could be acceptable alternatives. Esolo5002 (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Rik Makarem → Tarik Makarem – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. ~2026-32163-6 (talk) 16:11, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Amiram Kadosh → Kadosh (musician) – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Ekaterina is a cat (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers → JASRACJASRAC – Per WP:CONCISE, WP:COMMONNAME and MOS:ACROTITLE. Absolutiva 11:20, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – IU → IU (disambiguation)IU (disambiguation) – Clearly, one explanation is very important and commonly used, while others fall into narrower categories and are less known. 勳薫赫鶴錡 (talk) 10:30, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • IU (entertainer) → IU

• (Discuss) – Symposium → Greek symposium – Revisiting the previous RM. It is clear that both the ancient and modern definitions are equally primary, and I do not see why the ancient version of the symposium overshadows the modern academic conference, from which many important things sprung. I also do not have prejudice towards Ancient Greek symposium or Symposium (Ancient Greece) if the proposed location is still too vague, but Greek symposium appears to be its WP:COMMONNAME. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:16, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Symposium (disambiguation) → Symposium

• (Discuss) – CBP One → CBP HomeCBP Home – To reflect how its name was updated, and it is continuing being used by the US government, meaning it is likely more notable sources will write about it in the future referring to it as CBP Home. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 06:32, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – 1985 Newton Falls–Wheatland tornado → 1985 Niles–Wheatland tornado – This tornado is way more well known as the Niles - Wheatland tornado rather than the Newton Falls - Wheatland tornado. Primarily due to the tornadoes F5 damage occurring in both Niles and Wheatland, also being the two worst hit areas. Quincy Gordon (talk) 04:51, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Psychopathography of Adolf Hitler → Mental health of Adolf HitlerMental health of Adolf Hitler – "Psychopathography" is a kind of scholarship. The article is not about scholarship on Hitler, but about Hitler. The difference is the same as, e.g., history and historiography. --Altenmann >talk 04:40, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Afghanistan–Pakistan clashes (2024–present) → Afghanistan–Pakistan clashes (2024–2025) – : This article should be discontinued and all subsequent clashes from January 2026 should only be added to the Afghanistan–Pakistan border skirmishes. This page was made to cover the escalation of clashes between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Until another proper conflict breaks out again like the October 2025 conflict, any new border clashes should only be added to the original border clashes page. Having to update both this page and the normal one till the end of time seems useless waste of both energy and time of not only editors, but also readers as well, since both pages have been covering the same new border clashes since 2024. I'd say to end this page hear and only add new clashes to the normal page. If a new conflict between Pakistan and the Taliban breaks out, it can have its own article and a sub-section on the Afghanistan–Pakistan border skirmishes article. This article should only be limited to cover the 2024-2025 major escalation in clashes between Pakistan and Afghanistan since the Taliban takeover and the subsequent clashes between the countries during this escalation. It should only cover a phase, not a never-ending conflict. KashanAbbas (talk) 04:17, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Coulson FireLiner → Boeing 737 FireLiner – The article should be move to Boeing 737 FireLiner because the plane is not referred to as the "Coulson FireLiner" by the sources nor have I personally heard seen it in any of my research of the topic. I understand that the article was moved from Coulson Aviation-Boeing 737 FireLiner to Coulson FireLiner for WP:CONCISE, I understand that the name could be more concise, but Coulson FireLiner is not the way to do it. I believe Boeing 737 FireLiner is a better and more concise, especially considering thats what the manufacturer calls it. I do note that I probably should've named it Boeing 737 FireLiner to begin with when I first started the article. AllegedlyAPhotographer (talk) 01:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Jacques Marie Frangile Bigot → Jacques Marie François BigotJacques Marie François Bigot – "Frangile" is a misspelling of "François". I made this same request two years ago mainly based on contemporary sources (see the previous discussion for a list), though at the time there was not enough evidence in recent sources to support changing the name. Since then, a new paper about him and his scientific work has been published by three current entomologists, including a biography which not only gives the correct spelling of his name but also explicitly notes that "Frangile" is a misspelling: * Pont, A.C., Chainey, J.E. & Evenhuis, N.L. (2024) The types of Diptera (Insecta) described by J.-M.-F. Bigot (specifically look at this page for the start of the biography along with the note about the misspelling) (Also yes I'm aware it's already referenced in the article) Monster Iestyn (talk) 01:29, 21 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:21, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Breton Civil War, 1341–1343 → War of the Breton Succession, 1341–1343 – WP:CONSUB. These are subarticles of War of the Breton Succession and should be titled consistently with it. My own preference would be to also move away from "initial campaign" to "opening campaign" or "first phase". I considered boldly moving War of the Breton Succession to Breton Civil War, based on comments during the Initial campaign's GA review, but I find the huge uptick in ngrams suspicious. Srnec (talk) 01:10, 21 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 01:20, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Initial campaign of the Breton Civil War → Initial campaign of the War of the Breton Succession

• (Discuss) – Critics' Choice Movie Awards → Critics' Choice Award – (or plural form) This is the current name, and the current split into an historic event that only existed for 5 years is confusing. Suggest merging Critics' Choice Television Awards into this article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 01:04, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Critics' Choice Award → Critics' Choice Award (disambiguation)Critics' Choice Award (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Corn Fed (album) → Corn FedCorn Fed – No other exact use of this title on Wikipedia. Anything else that is titled "corn fed" without additional words does not have an article, and I feel the capital F and lack of hyphen should be enough per WP:SMALLDETAILS from any adjectival use of "corn-fed". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:27, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Make America Great Again → Make America Great Again (slogan) – To make Make America Great Again and MAGA primary redirects to Trumpism. Thanks, Glasspalace (talk • contribs) 00:09, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – First ladies and gentlemen of Alaska → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Alaska – All these pages regarding the first ladies and first gentlemen of U.S. states and territories are lists. Emphasising first ladies and first gentlemen would make it more concise and match that of Second Lady or Second Gentleman of the United States (emphasis mine). cookiemonster755 ^(talk) 11:29, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. HurricaneZeta^C 20:20, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Arkansas → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Arkansas
  • First ladies and partners of California → List of first ladies and first partners of California
  • First ladies of Florida → List of first ladies of Florida
  • First ladies of Georgia (U.S. state) → List of first ladies of Georgia (U.S. state)
  • First ladies of Hawaii → List of first ladies of Hawaii
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Kansas → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Kansas
  • First ladies of Maryland → List of first ladies of Maryland
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Massachusetts → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Massachusetts
  • List of first ladies and gentlemen of Michigan → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Michigan
  • First ladies of Missouri → List of first ladies of Missouri
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Montana → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Montana
  • First ladies of Nevada → List of first ladies of Nevada
  • First ladies and gentlemen of New York → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of New York
  • First ladies and gentlemen of North Carolina → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of North Carolina
  • First ladies of North Dakota → List of first ladies of North Dakota
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Oklahoma → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Oklahoma
  • First ladies of Pennsylvania → List of first ladies of Pennsylvania
  • List of first spouses of South Carolina → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of South Carolina
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Texas → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Texas
  • First ladies of Wisconsin → List of first ladies of Wisconsin
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Alabama → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Alabama
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Arizona → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Arizona
  • First ladies of Idaho → List of first ladies of Idaho
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Kentucky → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Kentucky
  • First Lady of American Samoa → List of first ladies of American Samoa
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Guam → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Guam
  • First ladies and gentlemen of Puerto Rico → List of first ladies and first gentlemen of Puerto Rico

• (Discuss) – Zale Corporation → ZalesZales – WP:COMMONNAME. A search for "Zales" by itself without any other keywords turns up exclusively content on the jeweler. Most of the inbound links are from "Zales" or "Zales Jewelers" and not "Zale Corporation", and I couldn't find any other works with "Zales" including the S with which this might be confused. Most of the corporate-level content for the parent company is located at Signet Jewelers, including mentions of all spinoff brands such as Banter/Piercing Pagoda, so I don't think any confusion will ensue. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Political warfare in British colonial India → ? – WP:OR and WP:NPOV, the sources don't seem to use this term and it does not fit the content of the article. Joko2468 (talk) 19:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Qurabiya → KurabiyeKurabiye – Move to the best candidate for common name, by virtue of uniform transliteration from Turkish, versus the scattered Arabic-derived versions, and the all but non-existent usage of prior title, see Ngrams. The Turkish-derived name is also the only one with its own Wiktionary page. Iskandar323 (talk) 13:23, 20 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 19:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Wikipedia:Please, put Pandora back in the box → Wikipedia:Please, close Pandora's box – or a similar title, at least this is a bit of a silly reason to do this, and it's thus technically weak as a result... but the title is incorrect. per pandora, and per depictions of her, she herself was never among the contents of the "box" (actually a pithos) in the first place, so it's not possible to put her back in it arguments could be made for also changing the "box" part, but even i'm not that much of a pedant consarn _{(talck) (contirbuton s)} 19:04, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Template:Cryptography navbox → Template:Cryptography – The standard in Category:Cryptography templates is not to use "navbox" in its name. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 22:33, 20 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:35, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – D.O. (entertainer) → Doh Kyung-sooDoh Kyung-soo – I propose moving/renaming this article to Doh Kyung-soo as it has become the primary identifier for the subject in his current professional capacity as a soloist and actor (WP:KOREANNAME, WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:NATURAL). The subject is now credited as Doh Kyung-soo across all his filmography, his recent solo music albums (Blossom (Doh Kyung-soo EP) and Bliss) under Company Soosoo, how Blitzway introduced him, and his Instagram account. The following Korean English-language articles are also excellent evidence: The Chosun Ilbo, Korea JoongAng Daily, and The Korea Times. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ ^{→𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎←} 03:49, 20 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Whispering Woods (novel) → Whispering WoodsWhispering Woods – The redirect now in place at Whispering Woods is just for a minor fictional location mentioned in a plot summary at Paper Mario: The Origami King#Plot, the primary meaning of this term seems much likely to be a novel (the article here) than a fictional location that doesn't seem even that important to the story of the game. Sidenote: the only link to is from a mention at History of Maryland Transit Administration, so there's another, real-world geographical meaning for this, presumably, but its unclear if its particularly notable (so I am not proposing a disambig at this time). _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:16, 20 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Base Set (Pokémon) → Base SetBase Set – I initially created it like this because there was apparently a "Base Set" for Magic: The Gathering, but upon further investigation, it seems like the term is just an alternative of Core Sets. From looking at things, there's no TCG set in Magic, Pokemon, or otherwise that is just called Base Set (the closes thing is other sets called, for instance, "Pokemon Diamond and Pearl Base Set"). Currently, Base Set is a redirect to "Set", but there's no entries on the disambiguation, which leads me to believe that the reader would be better served with this move. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Dragon Hopper → D-HopperD-Hopper – This is a cancelled game that is now finally officially releasing in 2026. However, Nintendo changed the name of the game for this release. Since "Dragon Hopper" now is just the old name that was never used for a released game, with "D-Hopper" being used for an official release, I believe there is no good reason to keep it named Dragon Hopper. WP:COMMONNAME might be a common counter-argument, but sources have already begun to call it D-Hopper,^[1] since that is now the name of an upcoming title. TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 17:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Shirley Heights, Antigua and Barbuda → Shirley HeightsShirley Heights – Unnecessary disambiguation. Also is the primary topic– it being a major component of a UNESCO World Heritage site. CROIX^talk 16:56, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Sinhalisation → SinhalizationSinhalization – The current spelling "Sinhalisation" has rarely appeared in real usage. Across academic reports, mainstream media, and online sources, the term is consistently rendered as "Sinhalization" with -ization rather than -isation. Wikipedia should follow the dominant usage. As an example, see the following report from PEARL, as well as articles published by South Asian Voices and Countercurrents that use American spelling: * State Sponsored Sinhalization of the North-East The Anti-Development Machine (PDF) (Report). People for Equality and Relief in Lanka (PEARL). 20 January 2026. * Kapur, Roshni (2020-08-26). "Tamil diaspora and the LTTE movement in Sri Lanka". South Asian Voices. Archived from the original on 30 November 2023. Retrieved 2026-01-27. * Kumarathasan, Rasingam (2022-06-07). "State Sponsored Sinhalese Colonization Of Tamils' Traditional Homeland". Countercurrents. Archived from the original on 8 June 2022. Retrieved 2026-01-27. Here are some more examples: * "Sinhalization of Buddhism in Sri Lanka" (PDF). Journal of Peace Studies. 21 (2). June 2014. Retrieved 2026-01-27. * Devana, Senanayake (19 August 2024). "The Lingering Economic Consequences of Sri Lanka's Civil War". thediplomat.com. Retrieved 2026-01-27. * Jude Lal, Fernando (2025-03-13). "War and armed resistance in Sri Lanka: On the Tamil Eelam right to self-determination and peace in the Indian Ocean | Links". links.org.au. Retrieved 2026-01-27. * "The Sri Lankan Civil War and Its History, Revisited in 2020". Harvard International Review. 2020-08-31. Retrieved 2026-01-27. * P.K.BALACHANDRAN (2019-07-20). "Sinhalization of Tamil Areas by Building Buddhist Shrines over Hindu Temples". www.thecitizen.in. Retrieved 2026-01-27. * "Trincomalee Under Siege: Land Grabs Target the Tamil Homeland in Sri Lanka [EN/TA/SI] - Sri Lanka | ReliefWeb". reliefweb.int. 2024-10-31. Retrieved 2026-01-27. RajaRajaC ^Talk 16:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Wikipedia:Do not use subpages → Wikipedia:Historical archive/Wikipedia:Do not use subpages – Its in the To-do list in Wikipedia talk:Historical archive. ~2026-36939-5 (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Narcoculture in Mexico → narcoculture – @Myceteae, Thepharoah17, Tavix, Rosguill, StephenMacky1, Doug Weller, Glasspalace, Tonkarooson, and Agnieszka653:, It would be provincial not to change the title because the article does not focus on Mexican territory. ~2026-58941-6 (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Communism in France → Socialism in FranceSocialism in France –  :@Myceteae, Thepharoah17, Tavix, Glasspalace, Tonkarooson, Agnieszka653, Rosguill, StephenMacky1, and Doug Weller:, it’s like this on other articles too, like “ [2] it’s like this on other articles too like “Progressivism in the United States”, “Liberalism in the United States”, “Modern liberalism in the United States”, etc. it’s also shorter which is a guideline ~2026-58941-6 (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Communism in Colombia → Socialism in Colombia – @Glasspalace, Rosguill, StephenMacky1, Doug Weller, Tonkarooson, Agnieszka653, Myceteae, Thepharoah17, and Tavix:, I like the conciseness of the second title ~2026-58941-6 (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Matt Goodwin → Matt Goodwin (disambiguation)Matt Goodwin (disambiguation) – "Author" as the disambiguator doesn't quite cover everything he does- and also this article looks like a clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC with the only other people of the same name being two minor sportspeople. Chessrat ^{(talk, contributions)} 14:32, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Matt Goodwin (author) → Matt Goodwin

• (Discuss) – Princess Maria Antonietta of Bourbon-Two Sicilies → Princess Maria Antonietta of the Two SiciliesPrincess Maria Antonietta of the Two Sicilies – I see that a lot of Princesses of the House of Bourbon-Two Sicilies who were born or lived when the Kingdom of Two Sicilies still existed had their article named with formula (Princess) Name of the Two Sicilies, like Maria Christina of the Two Sicilies, Princess Luisa Carlotta of the Two Sicilies, Princess Maria Carolina of the Two Sicilies (born 1856). I also see the same phenomenon for the Princesses of Parma, those who were born when the Duchy of Parma were still exist were called Princess Name of Parma, like Princess Isabella of Parma, Maria Luisa of Parma, those who were born when the Duchy was no longer exist were called of Bourbon-Parma, like Zita of Bourbon-Parma. SO I want to change the article's name of those princesses. Oohlala8195 (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Marie-Caroline of Bourbon-Two Sicilies, Duchess of Berry → Maria Carolina of the Two Sicilies, Duchess of BerryMaria Carolina of the Two Sicilies, Duchess of Berry

• (Discuss) – Neural organoid → Cerebral organoidCerebral organoid – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. TMinch (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Andamanese → Andamanese peoplesAndamanese peoples – @Cuchullain: This refers to multiple ethnic groups, and it disambiguates between the Andamanese ethnic groups and Andamanese languages. Other similar language and ethnicity articles typically use this naming convention, and as such it should be moved back. Arctic Circle System (talk) 10:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ranglong Language → Ranglong languageRanglong language – Sentence case per MOS:AT. Arctic Circle System (talk) 09:53, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – SNCF Class X 73500 → A TER – As of the recent merger of SNCF Class X 73900 and DBAG Class 641 into this article, it is no longer solely about Class 73500s, but about several trains categorised as A TER. GearsDatapack (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Trukhmen → Trukhmen dialectTrukhmen dialect – Disambiguate from Trukhmens or Trukhmen people. Moving to Stavropol Turkmen dialect may also be desirable, though I am not sure how common this name is. It's not entirely unheard of, however. Arctic Circle System (talk) 08:40, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Girl in Red → girl in redgirl in red – (And also add {{Lowercase title}} to the article.) Pseudonym consistently stylized in lowercase. Rose Abrams (T C L) 08:36, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Lingam → LingaLinga – While liṅgaṃ is certainly a valid spelling, I don't believe it is the most common one, especially in scholarly sources. At least in the history-related sources I've read, the usual spelling is liṅga, without the anusvāra, although sources specifically dealing with Hinduism would probably be more authoritative here. The Monier-Williams dictionary, which is currently cited in the etymology section, has the entry under liṅga, and the entry doesn't mention the spelling "liṅgaṃ" at all. Liṅgaṃ appears a grand total of once in the entire dictionary, as part of a specialized definition, whereas liṅga is used many times in other definitions. (It's a pretty old source, though, and potentially outdated, so if something more recent indicates that liṅgaṃ is indeed the standard Sanskrit spelling, then I will defer to that.) A previous move discussion in 2017 got bogged down by a discussion of whether a cited Google ngram chart was accurate. At the risk of potentially going down that same path, I would like to propose my own data point: a JSTOR search for "linga" gets some 6,800 results, whereas searching for "lingam" gets only about 3,000. I haven't personally certified every single one of them to weed out irrelevant results (there are plenty on both sides), but I think it does point toward liṅga being the more common spelling. I'm having a hard time checking the sources currently used in our article -- a lot of them are cited using Google Books, and I'm having weird technical difficulties there where it won't return search results or go to linked page numbers -- but basically all of the listings in the External Links section use the spelling "liṅga", and several of the cited sources using "liṅgaṃ" are fairly recent news items that could basically be a circular reference in terms of the name -- our article has been at "lingam" for a while, and people might be seeing that and assuming that's the usual name. *Sources using liṅgaṃ: **Doniger's article "God's Body, or, the Lingam Made Flesh" (currently cited by our article) **Dasgupta's entry in Cultural Encyclopedia of the Penis (also currently cited by our article) **Gabriella Eichinger Ferro-Luzzi's article "The Female Liṅgam", which apparently got several response articles that also show up among the JSTOR results **"A Kāshmīrī Lingam of the 10th Century", H. Goetz, 1965 **Most of the other sources I saw on JSTOR using this spelling seemed to me to be less relevant; for example, "Presenting Cultural Artifacts in the Art Museum: A University-Museum Collaboration" is mainly about other topics; other articles have only passing mentions, etc. *Sources using liṅga: **Kramrisch's chapter in the book The Presence of Śiva is titled "Liṅga". (currently cited by our article) **Rao, Elements of Hindu Iconography, 1993 **Discourses on Śiva, Meister, 1984 (currently cited by our article) **Chakravarti, The Concept of Rudra-Śiva Through the Ages (currently cited by our article) **Singh, A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century (currently cited by our article) **Wolf, "The Linga as Center: A Study in Religious Phenomenology", 1978 **Zarina Kolah, "Shiva: The Linga Aspect in Indian Art and Literature", 2001 **"Beginnings of Liṅga Cult in India", Atul K. Sur, 1932 **"The Origin of Liṅga Worship", book chapter by Richard H. White, 2002 **Nina Mirnig, "Early Strata of Śaivism in the Kathmandu Valley", 2016 **The Form and Formlessness of Śiva: The Linga in Indian Art, Mythology, and Pilgrimage, Fleming, 2009 **Das Gupta, "A Note on the Linga with Sakti Images in Bengal Art", 2011 So most of the scholarly sources I could verify from our article use the spelling liṅga. A couple use liṅgaṃ -- again, both spellings are valid -- but there's a clear preference for liṅga, especially in sources that deal directly with this subject (as opposed to, say, "Presenting Cultural Artifacts in the Art Museum" or Cultural Encyclopedia of the Penis). 3 kids in a trenchcoat (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Triple J Hottest 100, 2025 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2025Triple J Hottest 100 of 2025 – As per WP:Article titles#Comma-separated disambiguation, commas are seldom acceptable as a disambiguation in titles for articles covering topics like these. The way these titles are currently structured is not WP:NATURAL, seeing as they use a comma before the year, which is not normally pronounced, this makes the text sounds very robotic and computer-like. Searching up "triple j hottest 100" online, most of the results say "Hottest 100 of (year)". I have also proposed changing the name of the 1989 and 1990 countdowns to "Hot 100" as they were known at the time. The fact that we can find more sources saying "of (year)" means these titles comply well with WP:COMMONNAME. The ABC officially named the 2025 edition the "Hottest 100 of 2025". An alternate option is to move the year to the front of the title but I don't think there's any reason the year needs to precede the rest of the title. Qwerty123M (talk) 03:16, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1989 → Triple J Hot 100 of 1989
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1990 → Triple J Hot 100 of 1990
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1991 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1991
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1993 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1993
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1994 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1994
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1995 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1995
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1996 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1996
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1997 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1997
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1998 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1998
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 1999 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 1999
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2000 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2000
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2001 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2001
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2002 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2002
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2003 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2003
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2004 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2004
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2005 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2005
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2006 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2006
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2007 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2007
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2008 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2008
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2009 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2009
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2010 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2010
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2011 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2011
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2012 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2012
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2013 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2013
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2014 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2014
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2015 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2015
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2016 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2016
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2017 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2017
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2018 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2018
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2019 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2019
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2020 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2020
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2021 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2021
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2022 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2022
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2023 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2023
  • Triple J Hottest 100, 2024 → Triple J Hottest 100 of 2024

• (Discuss) – Auburn Automobile → Auburn Automobile CompanyAuburn Automobile Company – This article on the whole is clearly about the company itself. We should use the full name, just like "Ford Motor Company". This name appears in literature from at least 1906-1936, but I expect it covers the entire 37 years of the company's existence. The article's lede should also be cleaned up to concentrate more on overall topic (and not on post-bankruptcy, etc.). Mark Froelich (talk) 02:25, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine → Temerty Faculty of MedicineTemerty Faculty of Medicine – The Temerty Faculty of Medicine has been the official and colloquial name of the faculty since 2020. It has branded itself as Temerty Medicine in most official marketing, social media, etc. This change is no longer new, and most sources only refer to the faculty by its new name at this point, so Wikipedia should do so as well per WP:NAMECHANGES, as it has become the common name. Examples: * Its official website * Toronto Star * Ontario Hospital Association * The Varsity * Sinai Health * The Medium * Sunnybrook Research Institute * CBC * Government of Ontario
  RapidDweller (talk) 01:27, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Rajashree (actress) → Rajshri NairRajshri Nair – Name per Kerala Kaumudi [3] interview and all interviews [4], all social media [5] [6]. This avoids unnecessary confusion with Rajasree. There are no significant coverage source on the article with the current name. DareshMohan (talk) 01:00, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Messel Formation → Messel PitMessel Pit – I see no reason why the page is currently titled "Messel Formation" when there are other terms within the literature that are far more commonly used to refer to the site, namely "Messel Pit" or "Messel Pit Fossil Site". Other sites, such as "Konservat-Lagerstätte Menat" & "Cerin Lagerstätte" had a similar change to Use Commonly Recognized Names (See: WP:UCRN). The movement of the page would be in line with both how the literature refers to the site, & how the site is commonly referred to within the public zeitgeist. Additionally, I don't believe there's any other names that could be confused with the new name. Montanoceratops (talk) 23:20, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Globo On → TV Globo On – Current name as of 2026. VenezuelanSpongeBobFan2004 (talk) 23:10, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – JSN → JSN (disambiguation)JSN (disambiguation) – JSN should redirect to Jaxon Smith-Njigba per WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. WikiNav has him at 100% outgoing pageviews for JSN, and Google News has him everywhere. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – National Office for the Fight Against Pornography and Illegal Publications → Chinese Anti-Pornography and Anti-Illegal Publications Office – On the one hand, translation is an art, and I respect the art. On the other, there's no way that a Chinese government agency dedicated to the eradication of porn just so happens to translate to the quite cheeky acronym "NOFAP" (for the unaware, see NoFap). I'm not sure what a perfect translation is, but the one that GoogleTranslate gives me seems much more plausible. GTranslate gives "National Anti-Pornography and Anti-Illegal Publications Office", in which I've swapped "Chinese" for "National". I'm open to other plausible wordings. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:11, 19 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 22:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Radio 4 News FM → BBC Radio 4 News FMBBC Radio 4 News FM – Consistent naming of BBC Radio stations, including BBC Radio 5 (former), with which this station coexisted. UltrasonicMadness (talk) 21:07, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Song Sung Blue (film) → Song Sung Blue (2025 film) – Further disambiguate against same title documentary Song Sung Blue (2008 film). Use year for further disambiguation per WP:NCF. BOVINEBOY2008 21:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Gaius Furius Sabinius Aquila Timesitheus → TimesitheusTimesitheus – According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (people)#single name, a single name can be sufficient to identify a person from antiquity. There doesn't seem to be any other noticeable people with the name Timesitheus, as can be seen by the fact that the page Timesitheus already a redirect to this article. ... Linaxt (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 20:19, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – State Sponsors of Terrorism → US Designated State Sponsors of Terror – Multiple requests to rename the article, and the article is specific to the US government designation. As it does not include all perspectives, as pointed out in the current warning, it should be renamed. ReiPeixe (talk) 19:27, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Steal (TV series) → Steal (2026 TV series)Steal (2026 TV series) – I actually did the opposite move myself, and then after looking at the Steal (disambiguation) page a little closer, I noticed that Steal (game show) is also present. Opening this move discussion for input from others because WP:NCTV could be interpreted as the status quo being fine if (game show) is for non-series television. I have no strong opinion on the final location. Of note is that both are British, so using country of origin is not helpful in this case. -2pou (talk) 18:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Galactic Empire (Star Wars) → Empire (Star Wars)Empire (Star Wars) – This Wikipedia, not Wookieepedia. We should stick to simpler, familiar names that are more easily recognizable by non-fans. — Anonymous 18:12, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Mayen → Mayen, Rhineland-PalatinateMayen, Rhineland-Palatinate – Based on pageview data, most of the people listed on the dab page are more notable than the town in Germany currently occupying the base title Duckmather (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mayen (disambiguation) → Mayen

• (Discuss) – Shivalinga (2016 film) → Shivalinga (film)Shivalinga (film) – No other film by this exact name, all of the reviews of the 2017 film a.k.a. the remake say Sivalinga. [7] [8] [9]. #) The CBFC certificate mentions the remake as Sivalinga [10]. #) All of the video songs [11] and trailer/teaser of the remake spell the film as Sivalinga. While Shivalinga could refer to both films, there is enough sources supporting Sivalinga as the title of the remake. DareshMohan (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. cyberdog958^Talk 01:12, 19 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. HundredVisionsAndRevisions (talk) 17:44, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Like-minded 10 Parties → United Bangladesh AllianceUnited Bangladesh Alliance – official name and to avoid move clash A$ianeditorz (talk) 10:27, 19 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. HundredVisionsAndRevisions (talk) 17:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – War on poverty → War on PovertyWar on Poverty – The common name for this page has been consistently uppercased since the mid-1970s, per the n-grams. Major references, such as the War on Poverty entry in Encyclopedia Britannica, uppercase. The percentage extent of the uppercasing in the n-grams meets the standard for uppercasing on Wikipedia. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Speedrunz (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – 2026 Chilean wildfires → 2026 Chile wildfires2026 Chile wildfires – Make consistent with 2024 Chile wildfires and 2023 Chile wildfires. Speedrunz (talk) 15:47, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Lindbergh Beacon (Los Angeles) → Lindbergh Beacon – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as the only other article currently listed at the disambiguation page "Lindbergh Beacon" is a single-source paragraph in another article, which can be accomodated by simply adding this hatnote to this article: {{about|the aircraft beacon in Los Angeles|the one in Chicago|Palmolive Building#Lindbergh Beacon}}. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 14:56, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Lindbergh Beacon → Lindbergh Beacon (disambiguation)Lindbergh Beacon (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Malakai Black → Aleister BlackAleister Black – Black returned to WWE under this name in April 2025.[12] He departed AEW almost one year ago,[13] so in the next few years the name Malakai Black is not going to be used to refer to this wrestler. As an example, during his AEW tenure POST Wrestling referred to Black with the Malakai name,[14] but since he has been back at WWE, they are now using Aleister Black.[15] I think Aleister Black is now his WP:COMMONNAME and he has been with WWE for long enough to warrant an update to this article.Tainmere (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Taixu → Shi TaixuShi Taixu – In the religious historical tradition of Chinese Han Buddhism, the surname of monks is "Shi". Huangdan2060 (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Xuyun → ? – –Shi Xuyun. In the religious historical tradition of Chinese Han Buddhism, the surname of monks is "Shi" Huangdan2060 (talk) 13:46, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Xuecheng (monk) → ? – Shi Xuecheng. In the religious historical tradition of Chinese Han Buddhism, the surname of monks is "Shi". Please see the English news reports, which also follow the Chinese convention of referring to him as Shi Xuecheng: China Buddhist leader Xuecheng quits amid sexual misconduct allegations "Shi Xuecheng, who is the abbot of Longquan Temple near Beijing and also a member of the ruling Communist Party's top political advisory body, denies denied the allegations."; Chinese monk Shi Xuecheng 'demanded sexual favours from nuns' "The abbot of Longquan Monastery in northwest Beijing, Shi Xuecheng, is accused of harassing numerous nuns in a 95-page document compiled by two fellow monks."; Top Buddhist Monk Resigns Amid #MeToo Accusations "The Buddhist Association of China has accepted the resignation of Shi Xuecheng as chairman, the group said in a statement on its website on Wednesday. It did not elaborate on the reason for the resignation, but added that a deputy chairman, Shi Yanjue, will temporarily head the association.". Huangdan2060 (talk) 13:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Spike and Suzy → ? – Spike and Suzy is the worst possible name for this series. All other names offer at least one advantage, Willy and Wanda two: * Willy and Wanda - original name, largest number of albums * Bob and Bobette - largest time span * Spike and Suzy - nothing * Luke and Lucy - most recent While Willy and Wanda would be the best choice if we know that no extra albums will appear in English, it is quite customary also to use the current name. Bob and Bobette also has an edge. Perhaps the (in English disgraceful) film can be counted to Luke and Lucy's advantage. gidonb (talk) 11:41, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – JAC Hunter → JAC T9 Ute – It is marketed as the T9 outside of China, and the T9 Ute in Australia. Either one would be fine, the Ute part is dropped in a fair few outlets, and just means pickup in Australian English. Not stuart60 (talk) 10:31, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Great Wall Shanhai Cannon → GWM Cannon AlphaGWM Cannon Alpha – It is the Cannon Alpha in Australia and New Zealand and should be moved as per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CARNAMES. Not stuart60 (talk) 10:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Great Wall Pao → Great Wall Ute – It is marketed in Australia as the Great Wall Ute (formerly) / GWM Ute (currently) in Australia and New Zealand, should be moved to either as per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CARNAMES. It is called the GWM P-Series in South Africa though. Not stuart60 (talk) 10:24, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Alişan (given name) → Alişan (name) – There are also surnames in addition to first names. ~2026-55671-0 (talk) 05:54, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Gwenno Saunders → GwennoGwenno – Artist is primarily known by the mononym she releases her music under. Her last name only appears in two sources on this page, while most refer to her as just Gwenno. Target also redirects here currently. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Utopia (Gwenno Saunders album) → Utopia (Gwenno album)Utopia (Gwenno album) – Artist has consistently released under a mononym, and the disambiguator should reflect that. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 05:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Inside the Fire → deleted to make room – Inside the Fire (album) was BLARed last June for concerns of notability, leaving the song as the only item on the dab page with an article, and thus making it PTOPIC by default. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 04:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inside the Fire (song) → Inside the Fire

• (Discuss) – Veleno (guitar) → Veleno Guitars – Prior to my edits on January 26, 2026, this article said that "The Veleno guitar is a highly regarded series of aluminium guitars built by metal craftsman John Veleno." and "Veleno guitars are known for their unique sound quality.". However, there exist multiple models of these "Veleno Guitars", such as the Original, the Traveler, the Ankh, as well as two basses. As there is not enough notability to give each of these models their own page (the original being the most notable), I decided to make this page about the Veleno Guitars company themselves, with a strong focus on John Veleno's history with the guitars he made. Veleno is a company now, not just specifically a series of guitars, as shown on their old website which appears to have been managed by John back when he was still alive, as shown here in this section, a large bit of which is typed in the first-person perspective, as well as their new website. Because of this, I propose that this article be renamed to Veleno Guitars as it is a guitar company now. Romeo v. Juliet (talk) 04:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Waiting Room (disambiguation) → Waiting RoomWaiting Room – All entries (except one) listed upon the fairly extensive Waiting Room (disambiguation) page use uppercase "R". The one exception is the putative WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, Waiting room. However, various other uppercase dab pages, such as Cigarette Girl, Escape Velocity, Police Academy, Significant Other or Union Station, do not use lowercase forms Cigarette girl, Escape velocity, Police academy, Significant other or Union station as primary topics. Users who type the uppercase form while intending to research the lowercase, will still find it on the dab page. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:18, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Minnesota Star Tribune → The Minnesota Star TribuneThe Minnesota Star Tribune – Per MOS:THETITLE: https://www.startribune.com/ \ https://www.startribunecompany.com/ . — DocWatson42 (talk) 02:53, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Makhadzi → Makhadzi (singer) – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the singer is named after the title/role, which has greater educational value and long-term significance Kowal2701 (talk) 01:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Makhadzi (title) → Makhadzi

• (Discuss) – Rebecca Patricia Armstrong → Becky ArmstrongBecky Armstrong – Major magazines and newspapers from different countries all refer to her as simply "Becky Armstrong," not using her full name "Rebecca Patricia Armstrong".
  Examples: * https://www.teenvogue.com/story/summer-suits-trend - "Thai Actress Becky Armstrong Kicked Off Summer Suits Season With a Trendy Twist at Cannes Film Festival 2025 — See Photos" from Teen Vogue (US) - article makes no mention of her full name at all * https://www.harpersbazaar.com.sg/fashion/news-trends/chanel-cruise-2026-singapore-show-celebrities - Harper's Bazaar Singapore, also does not mention her full name * https://www.voguehk.com/en/article/celebrity/becky-armstrong-best-fashion-looks/ - Vogue Hong Kong, also does not mention her full name * https://entertainment.inquirer.net/648060/becky-armstrong-is-the-new-nanno-in-girl-from-nowhere-the-reset - Philippine Daily Inquirer Plus many more examples.
  She is also credited as just "Becky Armstrong" in official material, e.g. * Her official page and promo posts for her birthday concert in November use "Becky Armstrong": https://www.instagram.com/p/DRo-PDgj1kK/ * Girl from Nowhere: The Reset poster simply calls her "Becky Armstrong": https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNjQ4ZjM0MjItODdkYS00MWFlLWE0YmItOTViZWE1ODI4YmZmXkEyXkFqcGc@._V1_FMjpg_UX1000_.jpg
  Her IMDb page also uses Becky Armstrong: https://www.imdb.com/name/nm12282746/
  I believe that "Becky Armstrong" should be the main page title, not a redirect, for these reasons. She is credited as Becky Armstrong. That is her professional name. Bloomagiliw (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Jewel → Jewel (disambiguation)Jewel (disambiguation) – DAB already indicates primary topic (gemstone). fgnievinski (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Hyuk (singer) → Hyuk (VIXX singer) – Dab from Hyuk (1Verse singer) * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:48, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Chris Smith (defensive back) → Chris Smith (defensive back, born 1987)Chris Smith (defensive back, born 1987) – The current title is ambiguous. Chris Smith II, Chris Smith (safety, born 1985), and Chris Smith (American football coach) have all primarily played as a defensive back Joeykai (talk) 16:33, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 21:42, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Kevin Johnson (basketball) → Kevin Johnson (basketball player)Kevin Johnson (basketball player) – There is an article about Kevin Johnson (basketball coach). The purpose of this request is to distinguish between the basketball player and the basketball coach. Assadzadeh (talk) 07:11, 25 January 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). 162 etc. (talk) 18:25, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Islamic State – Pakistan Province → Islamic State – Pakistan branch – It creates confusion and not actually they are provinces. Reliable media portals also don't use term "province" A$ianeditorz (talk) 16:54, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 18:00, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Tacoma → Tacoma (disambiguation)Tacoma (disambiguation) – Tacoma, Washington is a major city of about a quarter million people. It's also the name of a model of truck, which of course is named after the city. For 5.5 years, the base name Tacoma has redirected to Tacoma, Washington, the result of a WP:BOLD move by yours truly, confirmed shortly thereafter by an RfD discussion. A recent RfD discussion changed that, and now Tacoma is a disambiguation page. However, this should never have been an RfD because it was essentially a debate about moving a page. Partially because this wasn't listed as a requested move, WP:PRIMARYTOPIC's second criteria, long-term educational significance, never got brought in. It is impossible to argue that a truck has anywhere near as much long-lasting educational significance as this major port city of the Pacific Northwest. The city is the clear primary topic, and the disambiguation page should be moved back to Tacoma (disambiguation) to open the way for a redirect straight to Tacoma, Washington. Red Slash 17:58, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – The staff ate it later → The staff ate it deliciously later – 2019年5月10日に日本語版で記事が作成された後に、2020年1月16日に英語版の記事が作成されていますが、その際に、日本語の「美味しく」と表現している部分の翻訳が抜けてしまっています。初版の出典を確認してみましたが、全て日本語の出典（AOLの出典が英語のように見えますが確認すると日本語の記事です。）を参照しています。 The Japanese version of this article was created on May 10, 2019, and the English version was created on January 16, 2020. However, during the creation of the English version, the translation for the Japanese expression “delicious” was omitted. Upon checking the sources for the first version, all sources referenced were Japanese (though the AOL source appears to be in English, it is actually a Japanese article). Tail furry (talk) 16:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Sankt Pölten → St. PöltenSt. Pölten – In public sources, "Sankt" is mostly abbreviated as "St.". This move request aims for consistency across municipalities in Lower Austria. Joe vom Titan (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aspangberg-Sankt Peter → Aspangberg-St. PeterAspangberg-St. Peter
  • Grafenbach-Sankt Valentin → Grafenbach-St. Valentin
  • Sankt Aegyd am Neuwalde → St. Aegyd am NeuwaldeSt. Aegyd am Neuwalde
  • Sankt Andrä-Wördern → St. Andrä-WördernSt. Andrä-Wördern
  • Sankt Anton an der Jeßnitz → St. Anton an der Jeßnitz
  • Sankt Bernhard-Frauenhofen → St. Bernhard-FrauenhofenSt. Bernhard-Frauenhofen
  • Sankt Corona am Wechsel → St. Corona am Wechsel
  • Sankt Egyden am Steinfeld → St. Egyden am Steinfeld
  • Sankt Georgen am Reith → St. Georgen am ReithSt. Georgen am Reith
  • Sankt Georgen am Ybbsfelde → St. Georgen am Ybbsfelde
  • Sankt Georgen an der Leys → St. Georgen an der Leys
  • Sankt Leonhard am Forst → St. Leonhard am Forst
  • Sankt Leonhard am Hornerwald → St. Leonhard am HornerwaldSt. Leonhard am Hornerwald
  • Sankt Margarethen an der Sierning → St. Margarethen an der Sierning
  • Sankt Martin, Lower Austria → St. Martin, Lower Austria
  • Sankt Martin-Karlsbach → St. Martin-Karlsbach
  • Sankt Oswald, Lower Austria → St. Oswald, Lower Austria
  • Sankt Pantaleon-Erla → St. Pantaleon-ErlaSt. Pantaleon-Erla
  • Sankt Peter in der Au → St. Peter in der AuSt. Peter in der Au
  • St. Valentin → St. Valentin
  • Sankt Veit an der Gölsen → St. Veit an der Gölsen

• (Discuss) – Thitu Island → Pag-asa IslandPag-asa Island – Pag-asa Island is the officially used English name in a range of formal publications and is widely reflected in contemporary English-language reliable sources. The current title Thitu Island is less frequently used in recent English usage. For consistency with similar features in the Spratly Islands, Wikipedia titles Taiping Island under its commonly used English name rather than Itu Aba Island. Using Pag-asa Island follows the same approach and aligns with WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONSISTENCY. The title Pag-asa Island already exists as a redirect to Thitu Island, indicating established usage and making the move technically straightforward, while alternative names can continue to be noted in the lead. ~2026-37885-3 (talk) 10:08, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 16:31, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich → Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München – Per WP:COMMONNAME, multiple independent English-language sources (THE, QS, ARWU) overwhelmingly use “Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München”, “LMU Munich”, or “University of Munich”, while I have not found comparable usage of any form of “Ludwig Maximilian University”, also not in the current article [16], [17], [18]. Moreover, LMU's content style guide [19] does also advise against “Ludwig Maximilian University (of Munich)” or variations thereof. Any Google searches on “Ludwig Maximilian University” or “Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich” provide sources that, upon closer inspection, indicate that they either cannot agree on a common name as they give a plethora of different spellings, or they actually refer to any of the three names referred by the reliable sources given above. Alternatively, the names “LMU Munich” or “University of Munich” could be considered, as they are also more frequent in reliable independent English-language sources than the current name. Proof finder (talk) 13:43, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 15:59, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – New Orleans Boy Scout Troop 137 → Sexual abuse scandal in New Orleans Boy Scout Troop 137 – This whole article is about the sexual abuse scandal, not about the troop itself. Also, there are no articles about Boy Scouts / Scouting America troops (otherwise there would be thousands of articles). Another possible title is Boy Scout New Orleans Troop 137 sexual abuse scandal. IdanST (talk) 13:19, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Amir Sultan Tarar → Colonel ImamColonel Imam – WP:COMMONNAME. He is much better known by his nom de guerre "Colonel Imam" rather than by his real name. The Urdu Wikipedia's article is already titled Colonel Imam. Here are few examples: * Google Scholar: "Colonel Imam" 134 results - "Amir Sultan Tarar" 18 results * Ngrams: result. "Amir Sultan Tarar" doesn't even appear in Ngrams. * JSTOR: 17 results for Colonel Imam while no results for Amir Sultan Tarar. Even nearly all sources in the article itself use "Colonel Imam". Malak Randhawa (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Japanese raccoon dog → Tanuki – This counts as a WP:PCM. The article has a complicated history; a merge of Japanese raccoon dog with Tanuki was first suggested in 2006 and rejected; the merge was suggested again five years later in 2011 where it succeeded (see Archive 1) under the name Japanese raccoon dog. A proposal to change the name to Tanuki was made in 2019 (see Requested move 19 December 2019 in Archive 2) and rejected. A long discussion has recently opened about the name and user Barcodc suggested another requested move, coincidentally just over five years after the last requested move. As consensus would appear to be weak, I think opening a request is warranted. Iesbian (talk) 10:20, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tanuki → Tanuki (disambiguation)Tanuki (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Racing game → Racing video gameRacing video game – This article is about racing VIDEO games, a video game genre, as is pretty obvious from the article, as well as the main category here (Category:Racing video games), related list of racing video games, and so on. The concept of a "racing game" is, however, broader, as seen in the parent Category:Racing games, which also covers tabletop games (basically, board games), which this article does not. This should be renamed accordingly, to clarify the scope, which also includes a common confusion between the concept of a racing game and race game. In fact, it may be a good idea to put a disambig in race game, directing folsk to either racing video game or race game, as the terms are often confused (I've just spend half an hour moving 2/3 entries from Category:Racing board games to Category:Race games, as people often use the terms racing and race without realizing they are not the same (FYI: racing=theme, race=mechanic; the latter is generally applicable to board, not video, games). Interested editors may also want to visit a semi-related Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2026_January_10#Category:Racing_board_games where I proposed to clarify the naming of the board game category. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:54, 10 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 13:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 09:45, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Trolley Square shooting → 2007 Trolley Square shooting2007 Trolley Square shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable mass shootings at Trolley Square does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. A year provides simple and effective context to when the incident took place. Raskuly (talk) 07:41, 11 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 09:23, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 09:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – 2025–2026 domestic military deployments in the United States → Domestic military deployments by the second Trump administration – Greater clarity following the precision criterion of the articles titles policy given the content of the article, the Operation Metro Surge article, and the July 2025 Central Texas floods article. While Memphis subsection and Tennessee secondary subsection of the article make clear that the National Guard deployment to Memphis was ordered by the Governor of Tennessee, it was done in coordination with the second Trump administration since Trump issued a presidential memorandum directing the Secretary of Defense to request that the Governor do so. Also, the Minneapolis subsection of the article only includes content about Trump's threats to invoke the Insurrection Act in Minnesota and the Defense Department's standby orders to the U.S. Army's 11th Airborne Division and Military Police Corps. Conversely, the Military mobilization section of the Operation Metro Surge article and the Search and rescue subsection of the July 2025 Central Texas floods article both discuss National Guard deployments that have not been conducted in coordination with the second Trump administration, but are nonetheless still domestic military deployments in the United States that have occurred in 2025 and 2026. The Minnesota National Guard mobilization covered in the Operation Metro Surge article only today became a deployment, and I don't think the article has ever mentioned the National Guard deployments in response to the July 2025 Central Texas floods because its focus has always been on the second Trump administration's National Guard deployments. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 03:11, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Shalimar Express → Shalimar Express (India) – The Pakistan train gets significantly more page views than the Indian train and starter service earlier, so the primary topic should be switched. Alternatively, don't move the Pakistan train article and create a disambiguation page at the base name. Mdewman6 (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shalimar Express (Pakistan) → Shalimar Express

• (Discuss) – Suicide Tuesday (DJ Hyper album) → Suicide TuesdaySuicide Tuesday – Suicide Tuesday is currently a redirect to MDMA#After-effects. The 'After effects' section no longer exists and there is no mention whatsoever of Suicide Tuesday anywhere at MDMA. There was previously a poorly sourced article at Suicide Tuesday; this was BLAR'd in 2011[20] and the inclusion of any content related to "Suicide Tuesday" was ultimately removed from MDMA. The DJ Hyper album is the only "Suicide Tuesday" currently described on en-wiki and should live at the base name. Retarget Suicide tuesday to Suicide Tuesday if moved. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 05:37, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – World Indoor Rowing Championships → World Rowing Indoor Championships – To be clear, I actually think this would be an uncontroversial move. But since my initial move got reverted, I'll now submit it here. The official name of the event is "World Rowing Indoor Championships". While 'indoor rowing' is a common phrase, these are indoor championships organized by World Rowing, and follow the naming for similar World Rowing events. Some sources: * https://worldrowing.com/events/indoor-events/world-indoor-championships/ (From World Rowing, the ones who organize the event. Obviously they would know its proper name.) * https://www.concept2.com/blog/2024-world-rowing-indoor-championships (Their sponsor. Not a source I would use for the article, but in this case it seemed appropriate.) * https://www.britishrowing.org/2025/02/british-athletes-shine-at-the-2025-world-rowing-indoor-championships/ * https://rowingcanada.org/event/2025-world-rowing-indoor-championships/ * https://www.asoif.com/news/world-rowing-concludes-thrilling-2025-virtual-rowing-indoor-championships-and-sets-sights MichielN (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 02:05, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Cyclones Vardah and ARB 02 → Cyclone VardahCyclone Vardah – Suggested by Hurricanehink at Talk:Hurricane Ida and Nor'Ida. The name is unnecessarily long and ARB 02 was a minor depression; doesn’t need to be in the title. ~2026-37187-9 (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. HurricaneZeta^C 01:09, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – WAIA (Kentucky) → WAIA (AM) – Radio stations with the same root callsign are dis-ambiguated by type, not state. Georgia guy (talk) 21:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Tadmur District → Palmyra DistrictPalmyra District – Main article is Palmyra (modern), not Tadmur (native name, arabic) –yeagvr · ✉ 20:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ayn al-Arab Subdistrict → Kobani Subdistrict – Main article is Kobani –yeagvr · ✉ 20:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ayn al-Arab District → Kobani DistrictKobani District – Main article is Kobani –yeagvr · ✉ 20:35, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Sources of the Rhine → Source of the RhineSource of the Rhine – Wikipedia prefers WP:SINGULAR titles, and the article says that there is a single source (at or near Lake Toma) that is generally recognized as the source of the Rhine. The opening paragraph of the article uses the word "source" in its singular form. Qualifying that, there is apparently a Swiss federal office that more precisely identifies some other location a bit farther north, but that doesn't sound like a very significant difference. Many rivers have multiple sources, of course, but this has one that is generally recognized, and the Swiss government seems to also be who put a plaque there to commemorate it. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 20:34, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ma'arrat Nu'man District → Maarat al-Numan DistrictMaarat al-Numan District – Main article is Maarat al-Numan –yeagvr · ✉ 20:29, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ma'arrat Nu'man Subdistrict → Maarat al-Numan SubdistrictMaarat al-Numan Subdistrict – Main article is Maarat al-Numan –yeagvr · ✉ 20:29, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Dredge (disambiguation) → DredgeDredge – Trying this again because the previous discussion was solely opposed by non-policy based WP:VOTEs. Please cite policy of some sort if you are going to oppose this time. My argument remains the same; there are several potential primary topics for "Dredge", including fishing and marine biology dredges, as well as the Dredge video game, and none of them are obviously primary. The dredging article is broader and doesn't necessarily go into detail on the dredges themselves. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:31, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Ed Oliver (American football) → Ed Oliver – He receives significantly more page views than the other people of the same name, and is also likely most notable. Michaelwallace22 (talk) 21:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ed Oliver → Ed Oliver (disambiguation)Ed Oliver (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Julia Chuñil → Death of Julia Chuñil – Move to Death of Julia Chuñil per Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Subjects_notable_only_for_one_event. She was practically unheard of nationally or even regionally prior to her murder. Prxtxnitx (talk) 21:02, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – MKS (Switzerland) → MKS PAMP – The company changed its name in 2021 after a merger. Proposing as an RM to help facilitate the above COI edit request. I am neutral. Sammi Brie (she/her · t · c) 18:22, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Under You (Foo Fighters song) → Under You – WP:DABSONG: Only "song" subject by this name that has an article. (Delete disambiguation page Under You per WP:ONEOTHER with the "other" being a "song" subject without an article, add hatnote after move.) Steel1943 (talk) 18:07, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Under You → Under You (disambiguation)Under You (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Geely Xingyuan → Geely EX2Geely EX2 – Nameplate used by Geely in all markets outside China, akin to other car articles that use the global nameplate, see WP:CARNAMES and WP:COMMONNAME. Inpops (talk) 15:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Evergreen High School shooting → 2025 Evergreen High School shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable shootings at this school does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. A year provides simple and effective context to when the incident took place. Raskuly (talk) 14:22, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Candidozyma auris → Candida aurisCandida auris – This would reverse the undiscussed uncontested technical move requested by User:Redthreadhx and would align with common usage as well as the content of the article itself. Note that the title should be displayed in italics, as Candida auris. The reclassification and change in the genus name was proposed in 2024.[21][22] The proposal is controversial and has not been widely adopted in the medical and scientific literature. Google Scholar shows 3,480 hits for "Candida auris" published since 2025 and just 388 hits for "Candidozyma auris". Similarly, Wiley shows 113 hits for "Candida auris"[23] and 12 for "Candidozyma auris"[24] published in the last 12 months and Springer–Nature shows 233 hits for "Candida auris"[25] and 40 for "Candidozyma auris"[26] in the past 12 months. While the UK government has apparently adopted Candidozyma auris,[27][28] Candida auris is still used by the US CDC,[29] the Canadian government,[30] the WHO,[31][32] federal and local health authorities in Australia,[33][34][35][36][37][38] APIC,[39] and other institutions. This article uses Candida auris throughout and never explains the discrepancy. Coverage of the proposed revision is probably warranted but the longstanding title and common medical and scientific name should be restored. —Myceteae‍🍄‍🟫 (talk) 10:51, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 13:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Rojava conflict → Rojava RevolutionRojava Revolution – This article's title changed a lot during its early years, but all of the moves that took place were unilateral, without discussion, and several were reverted. The current title was established in November 2015 by FunkMonk (talk · contribs), who moved it away from "Rojava Revolution" to the title "Rojava conflict", which they described as a "less biased title" (diff). This was reverted in March 2016 by Cedewey (talk · contribs), who described the "Revolution" title as a "more accurate descriptor of events" (diff), but FunkMonk quickly reverted the move, saying "it is POV and there is no consensus to move" (diff). Cedewey then opened a talk page discussion, but it resulted in no consensus. It has been at the title "Rojava conflict" ever since. It's now been nearly 10 years since this discussion ended with no consensus, and I thought it worth opening another one. The core argument against "Rojava Revolution" is that it presents a potentially biased point of view, and that "Rojava conflict" constitutes a more neutral title. This implies that the term "revolution" is, in itself, a non-neutral term; the argument against it would then apply to articles about the Russian Revolution, French Revolution and other similar events. But this argument also falls short of common name policy, as "Rojava Revolution" has 999 results on an English language search of Google Scholar, while "Rojava conflict" only has 25 results; furthermore, all but one of the results for "Rojava conflict" came from after this article was moved in 2015, implying that much of the scholarly use of this term is actually citogenesis. One could make the argument that "Rojava Revolution" is not a non-neutral descriptor, but even if it were a biased term, I think it clearly falls under our "non-neutral but common name" policy. There's also an issue of description, as the word "conflict" implies an article focused on military affairs, while this article discusses the social aspects much more. As "Rojava Revolution" clearly appears to be the common and most descriptive name for this subject, and as I'm unconvinced by the neutrality argument, I'm proposing this article be moved back to the title of "Rojava Revolution". Grnrchst (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Temryuk Idar → Temryuk Idarov – Per WP:COMMONNAME. * Temryuk Idar / Темрюк Идар: 0 results * Temryuk Idarov / Темрюк Идаров: 64 results (3 English, 61 Russian) * Temryuk Idarovich / Темрюк Идарович: 29 results (4 English, 25 Russian) AE182 (talk) 10:39, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Li Xi (politician) → Li Xi – Seems to be by far the most prominent Li Xi. The Account 2 (talk) 10:08, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Li Xi → Li Xi (disambiguation)Li Xi (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Yehud Medinata → Yehud (Persian province)Yehud (Persian province) – Per the multiple discussions above, this is a) grammatically incorrect, using a plural form "madinata" for a singular province b) not the most common name, because it is using a foreign term for "province" c) out of line with the naming of its predecessor province under Assyrian rule, which is Yehud (Babylonian province) Tiamut (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC) Tiamut (talk) 09:19, 16 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 08:25, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Pat White (American football) → Pat White (gridiron football)Pat White (gridiron football) – There was a prior RM on this above but WP:NCGRIDIRON seems clear: "If the person played multiple codes of football professionally, use (gridiron football)." He played both American football and Canadian football. Gridiron football is linked in the first sentence of Pat White's lead. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:03, 16 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 08:23, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Oldest people → List of oldest peopleList of oldest people – I feel like "List of" at the start is better. Jq talk 💬 contributions 03:17, 10 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:07, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 08:21, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Svenska Folkskolans Vänner → Svenska folkskolans vännerSvenska folkskolans vänner – Per Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(capitalization); the correct original spelling in this Swedish-language lemma is without capitalization. --Rießler (talk) 08:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Demotic (Egyptian) → Demotic scriptDemotic script – It seems the article was split, so this part should be renamed to make it clear that it is about the script specifically. The proposed new title is currently a redirect to this page. W. P. Uzer (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting.  ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:55, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Job → ? – I don't think there's a primary topic here. The current pageviews don't suggest that Work (human activity) is primary by usage, and even back when Job was a stand-alone article on jobs, it was still only coming in fourth in pageviews. I suppose one could argue WP:PT2, but Job (biblical figure) and Book of Job have enough long-term significance of their own that I don't think we're in substantially greater territory. Disambiguating will also give us more informative WikiNav data to help figure out what people who type in "Job" are actually looking for. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:02, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Job (disambiguation) → Job

• (Discuss) – Vainglory (disambiguation) → VaingloryVainglory – "Vainglory" is so uncommonly used as a synonym for vanity that it's arguable there is no obvious primary topic for this term. Ngrams lists vainglory as having a fraction of the uses vanity does, and it's likely that people searching for it on Wikipedia either have no idea what it means (in which case a DAB page with a Wiktionary box would be more helpful than sending them to "vanity") or are looking for one of the works of media with that name. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Facundo Astudillo Castro → Disappearance of Facundo Astudillo Castro – Castro by himself was not a notable person, rather the circumstances of his disappearance is what was notable. Since the notability of the article is centered around that, it would make sense for the article to be titled as such. Adding "Disappearance of" to the article title would be WP:CONSISTENT, WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:NPOV. Raskuly (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Princess Irene, Duchess of Aosta → Irene of Greece and Denmark – As she was a queen (although briefly) she should be formatted like other queens, with her name followed by of, and then her country of origin. Like Olga Constantinovna of Russia or Helen of Greece and Denmark or Sophia of Prussia or Elisabeth of Romania or Frederica of Hanover or Alexandra of Denmark . AurelianGlyph (talk) 06:44, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:22, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Zukowski → ŻukowskiŻukowski – Proper native spelling of the surname --Altenmann >talk 06:15, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Alt Vinalopó / Alto Vinalopó → Alto VinalopóAlto Vinalopó – Using a slash in a mainspace article is rather unconventional, and alternate names are usually saved for the explanation within the lead. However, I'm not opposed to the article being renamed to "Alt Vinalopó", if you see it necessary - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 04:55, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:45, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Okay! (song) → Okay!Okay! – The song seems to be the only thing that is referred to as "Okay!" The reasoning for the move is described through WP:SMALLDETAILS, indicating pages can be distinguished through punctuation. However, there is always a possibility that I could miss something, which is why I am creating a discussion instead of just moving it myself. Mathguy2718 (talk) 05:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Yahweh → Yahweh (historical) – The unqualified title "Yahweh" is highly controversial as it is simultaneously the common name for the living God of contemporary Abrahamic faiths and the subject of historical-critical scholarship. Moving the historical article allows readers to easily choose between the scholarly topic and the religious topic via disambiguation. Félix An (talk) 07:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 09:18, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:11, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yahweh (disambiguation) → Yahweh

• (Discuss) – Pipipi → PīpipiPīpipi – As said by @MothmanNZ, there is a macron missing in the title ([[40]], [[41]]) I dont think this move request is necessarily controversial, but there is some inconsistency within the article between the English "brown creeper" and Māori "pīpipi". Perhaps discussion on which name is best for the Wikipedia article is needed. Jonaslamarche (talk) 07:36, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Muslim conquest of the Iberian Peninsula → Muslim conquest of SpainMuslim conquest of Spain – This never should have been moved away from Spain. It's now a lengthy mouthful instead of concise and doesn't follow the predominant language. See Ngrams. Also, it doesn't accurately reflect the name of the geography as it was named at the time when it was conquered. It was Visigothic Spain or Hispania, but everyone knows the Roman term Hispania is what becomes 'Spain', so it gets simplified in literature as the latter. This becomes particularly clear when you look at what actually comes after 'Visigothic' in the literature, and it's not even close: Ngram #2. Finally, 'Iberian Peninsula' only appears on page where it's been inserted, only 12 times and not in the sources. 'Spain' appears nearly twice as much despite being temporarily displaced from the title, etc., and its prominent in sources. Arab conquest of Spain ... Moorish Spain ... Islamic Spain ... Muslim Spain are littered across the source titles. So if it's called Spain before the conquest, and Spain after the conquest, I think we know what it is called for the purposes of the conflict. And yes, Portugal exists, but it didn't at this point in history. See Ngrams or lack therein, for 'Visigothic Portugal'. The clear common name for the relevant territory at this point is 'Spain'. Iskandar323 (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:08, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Republic of the Congo (Léopoldville) → First Congolese RepublicFirst Congolese Republic – Following on from this discussion, this title appears to make the most sense. Periodisation of Congolese postcolonial history is usually split into post-independence (1960-1965) and Mobutu's rule (1965-1997). The country gained independence as the "Republic of the Congo" in 1960, was renamed "Democratic Republic of Congo" in 1964 (1 year before Mobutu's coup), and then "Zaire" in 1971. The scope of Zaire could be extended back to 1965 (with its first sentence saying (Democratic Republic of Congo until 1971) or similar). Proposed title does get some hits on Scholar and Books, and the Encyclopedia of African History uses this periodisation, as does Didier Gongola (but w the terms "First Republic" and "Second Republic") in his book Kowal2701 (talk) 11:21, 7 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. CNC (talk) 23:17, 14 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:08, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Sweida → SuwaydaSuwayda – WP:COMMONNAME since if you search up "Suwayda" on Google, you would see more of said "Suwayda" then "Sweida". GuesanLoyalist (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC) GuesanLoyalist (talk) 00:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 01:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:07, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Raviola di ricotta di Caltanissetta → Raviola di ricotta nissenaRaviola di ricotta nissena – WP: COMMONNAME: [42]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-99241 (talk) 19:47, 5 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 22:00, 12 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Pastoralia → Pastoralia (short story collection)Pastoralia (short story collection) – No primary topic. Srnec (talk) 00:11, 6 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Carolina2k22 • (talk) 03:13, 13 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 05:03, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pastoralia (disambiguation) → Pastoralia

• (Discuss) – Wikipedia:Database reports/Large fair-use images → Wikipedia:Database reports/Large non-free images – Consistency with other database reports. Not doing unilaterally since it is (or was) updated by a bot. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:59, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Hurricane Ida and Nor'Ida → Hurricane Ida (2009)Hurricane Ida (2009) – The new title feels highly unnatural, and we can include the nor’easter as a section within this article as a more traditional title. Plenty of storms like Hurricane Willa have also spawned indirect nor’Easter’s. ~2026-35518-9 (talk) 00:30, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:50, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Greek Super Cup 2025 → 2026 Greek Super Cup2026 Greek Super Cup – Admin restored the article to 2026 Greek Super Cup, but a user made a move to Greek Super Cup 2025, insisting in his views. This competition was played in January 2026. According to Wikipedia naming conventions and policies, articles about single events should normally be titled by the year in which the event occurred, not by the season per WP:TITLE and WP:COMMONNAME. In addition, other Super Cup articles follow the same rule (e.g. 2007 Greek Super Cup, 2026 Supercopa de España), which satisfies WP:CONSISTENCY, WP:PRECISION and WP:NAMINGCRITERIA. Furthermore, the previous move to "Greek Super Cup 2025" appears to have been done without a formal requested move discussion, which is contrary to WP:RMUM and the required process for contested or potentially controversial page moves. BEN917 (talk) 18:27, 9 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:14, 17 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 04:44, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother → Queen Elizabeth The Queen MotherQueen Elizabeth The Queen Mother – Per how her article had been "Queen Elizabeth The Queen Mother" since seemingly forever before the change 2 months ago. There was little to no established consensus among editors for the change in November, considering less than 10 people commented on it and the discussion was open for less than 10 days before being closed. Rexophile (talk) 04:10, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Frederick William, Elector of Brandenburg → Frederick William, the Great Elector – Current title is ambiguous. Kings Frederick William I, II and III of Prussia were all electors of Brandenburg as well. The nickname is unique and widely used. Srnec (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 03:05, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – List of Renée Good protests → Renée Good protestsRenée Good protests – As this article is shaping up to be more than just a list of protests, and more of a full-fledged article on the Renee Good protests - not only with how the protests section is structured and how different protests are recounted, but also with the addition of the wikibox and the Reactions section. As I stated in previous talk page edits, given that the protests were chiefly sparked by the killing of Renee Good, I believe it to be appropriate to name it as the Renee Good protests (in contrast to, say, the 2026 ICE shooting protests), especially given the already-existing article title. Imo this article has a similar format and structure to other articles covering mass protests whose titles do not start with "List of", for example October 2025 No Kings protests. Even if this remains a List-class article, it is more similar to the structure of a set index article, without a corresponding disambiguation page or other article with the same title. To put it briefly, this is shaping up to be the main article on the protests, so the title should be changed to reflect that. Hackquantumcpp (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – West Midlands Trains → West Midlands Trains (2017–2026)West Midlands Trains (2017–2026) – When the new government owned West Midlands Trains supersedes the Transport UK / Mitsui owned West Midlands Trains (2017-2026) on 1 February it will become the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Precedent when a privately operated UK train operator is nationalised with the trading name retained, has been for the outgoing operator article to be renamed to allow the incoming operator article to take the article title. Examples moved in the last year are similar RMs: *South Western Railway (2017-2025) that traded as South Western Railway, was renamed allowing the incoming operator article to be moved to South Western Railway after this discussion *c2c (1996-2025) that traded as c2c, was renamed allowing the incoming article to be moved to c2c after this discussion *Greater Anglia (2012-2025) traded traded as Greater Anglia, , was renamed allowing the incoming article to be moved to Greater Anglia after this discussion Lexsymbol (talk) 02:26, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • West Midlands Trains (2026) → West Midlands Trains

• (Discuss) – Sticks and Stones (Cher Lloyd album) → Sticks + Stones (album)Sticks + Stones (album) – Unexplained move [43], and the album's original name features "+". The "original" release of the album's name is Sticks + Stones, and Sticks and Stones or Sticks & Stones are for American / European releases. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 13:35, 23 January 2026 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Camilasdandelions (✉️) 23:31, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – International Hockey League → International Hockey League (disambiguation)International Hockey League (disambiguation) – Last discussed in 2011. This league, which was in existence for over 5 decades, is the primary topic both by long-term notability and by pageviews. 162 etc. (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 23:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • International Hockey League (1945–2001) → International Hockey League

• (Discuss) – Greatest Hits (PlayStation) → List of PlayStation Hits games – Article is a list, so it should be named appropriately, and as an added bonus, the new name falls under WP:NATURAL. I have not used "Greatest Hits" because the program's current name is "PlayStation Hits", so WP:NAMECHANGES applies in this instance. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 21:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Group of Five conferences → Group of Six conferencesGroup of Six conferences – I know there was a hesitancy to change the title, as people wanted to wait to see what the "new" Pac-12 was like. However, with the CFP's decision today to guarantee auto-bids to the conference champions of the Power 4 conferences, that is probably as close to an "official" source we will get that recognizes the Pac-12 is no longer a power conference, and is included in the "G6". Red0ctober22 (talk) 20:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Kingdom of Khana → Kingdom of Ḫana – The academic literature prefares "Ḫana". This spelling also fits the standard transliteration of the Akkadian consonant as "ḫ" and not "kh". It is also possible that the name should be simply Ḫana, since the term refers to a country and only after the fall of Mari there was a kingdom names after the country. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk 16:46, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Xavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffx → XavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffXXavlegbmaofffassssitimiwoamndutroabcwapwaeiippohfffX – Seems most of the sources use an uppercase X at the end. 🐠 _{formerly U.T.} 15:59, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Lists of Interstate Highways → Lists of interstate highways – Reason 1: WP:SENTENCECASE. Both “interstate” and “highways” are common adjectives and nouns respectively and should not be capitalized. The Interstate Highway System is exempted since it is the formal name of the highway network. In fact, Wikipedia already makes this distinction with other country’s highway lists versus formal institutions: and National Highways Development Project (since redirected, but the point still stands) – Reason 2: Outside sources. *The United States Army uses lowercase when referring to them generically: “Many Army posts, especially where division-level units are garrisoned, are near interstate highways.” *As does the Eisenhower Library: "It was not until June 29, 1956, when President Eisenhower signed the Federal Aid Highway Act, that interstate highways began to meet the challenge of the growing number of automobiles on the nation’s highways." *And the History Channel (for what it's worth): "The law authorized the construction of a 41,000-mile network of interstate highways that would span the nation." – Reason 3: WP:CONSISTENT with existing state highway lists. If this proposal earns consensus, I'll then nominate United States Numbered Highway System lists so that every list of highways in U.S. states will have uniformity. For instance, Kansas would have these lists: *List of state highways in Kansas (already lowercase) Note: When referring to individual interstate highways, the I or interstate before the number would still be capitalized. For example, “The longest interstate highway is Interstate 90, followed by I-80.” Woko Sapien (talk) 19:05, 31 December 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. TarnishedPath^talk 01:21, 8 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 03:44, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting.  — Amakuru (talk) 15:31, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • List of auxiliary Interstate Highways → List of auxiliary interstate highwaysList of auxiliary interstate highways
  • List of future Interstate Highways → List of future interstate highwaysList of future interstate highways
  • List of gaps in Interstate Highways → List of gaps in interstate highways
  • List of suffixed Interstate Highways → List of suffixed interstate highways
  • List of Interstate Highways in Alabama → List of interstate highways in Alabama
  • List of Interstate Highways in Alaska → List of interstate highways in Alaska
  • List of Interstate Highways in Arizona → List of interstate highways in Arizona
  • List of Interstate Highways in Arkansas → List of interstate highways in Arkansas
  • List of Interstate Highways in California → List of interstate highways in California
  • List of Interstate Highways in Colorado → List of interstate highways in ColoradoList of interstate highways in Colorado
  • List of Interstate Highways in Connecticut → List of interstate highways in Connecticut
  • List of Interstate Highways in Florida → List of interstate highways in Florida
  • List of Interstate Highways in Georgia → List of interstate highways in Georgia
  • List of Interstate Highways in Idaho → List of interstate highways in Idaho
  • List of Interstate Highways in Illinois → List of interstate highways in Illinois
  • List of Interstate Highways in Indiana → List of interstate highways in Indiana
  • List of Interstate Highways in Iowa → List of interstate highways in Iowa
  • List of Interstate Highways in Kansas → List of interstate highways in Kansas
  • List of Interstate Highways in Kentucky → List of interstate highways in Kentucky
  • List of Interstate Highways in Louisiana → List of interstate highways in Louisiana
  • List of Interstate Highways in Maine → List of interstate highways in Maine
  • List of Interstate Highways in Maryland → List of interstate highways in Maryland
  • List of Interstate Highways in Massachusetts → List of interstate highways in Massachusetts
  • List of Interstate Highways in Michigan → List of interstate highways in Michigan
  • List of Interstate Highways in Minnesota → List of interstate highways in Minnesota
  • List of Interstate Highways in Mississippi → List of interstate highways in Mississippi
  • List of Interstate Highways in Missouri → List of interstate highways in Missouri
  • List of Interstate Highways in Montana → List of interstate highways in Montana
  • List of Interstate Highways in Nebraska → List of interstate highways in Nebraska
  • List of Interstate Highways in Nevada → List of interstate highways in Nevada
  • List of Interstate Highways in New Hampshire → List of interstate highways in New Hampshire
  • List of Interstate Highways in New Jersey → List of interstate highways in New Jersey
  • List of Interstate Highways in New Mexico → List of interstate highways in New Mexico
  • List of Interstate Highways in New York → List of interstate highways in New York
  • List of Interstate Highways in North Carolina → List of interstate highways in North Carolina
  • List of Interstate Highways in North Dakota → List of interstate highways in North Dakota
  • List of Interstate Highways in Ohio → List of interstate highways in Ohio
  • List of Interstate Highways in Oklahoma → List of interstate highways in Oklahoma
  • List of Interstate Highways in Oregon → List of interstate highways in Oregon
  • List of Interstate Highways in Pennsylvania → List of interstate highways in Pennsylvania
  • List of Interstate Highways in South Carolina → List of interstate highways in South Carolina
  • List of Interstate Highways in South Dakota → List of interstate highways in South Dakota
  • List of Interstate Highways in Tennessee → List of interstate highways in Tennessee
  • List of Interstate Highways in Texas → List of interstate highways in Texas
  • List of Interstate Highways in Utah → List of interstate highways in Utah
  • List of Interstate Highways in Virginia → List of interstate highways in Virginia
  • List of Interstate Highways in Washington → List of interstate highways in Washington
  • List of Interstate Highways in Washington, D.C. → List of interstate highways in Washington, D.C.
  • List of Interstate Highways in West Virginia → List of interstate highways in West Virginia
  • List of Interstate Highways in Wisconsin → List of interstate highways in Wisconsin
  • List of Interstate Highways in Wyoming → List of interstate highways in Wyoming

• (Discuss) – Charlestown Bridge → William Felton "Bill" Russell BridgeWilliam Felton "Bill" Russell Bridge – The 2024-2025 bridge has officially been named William Felton "Bill" Russell Bridge. In 2019, a move request of the former bridge to North Washington Street Bridge did not reach consensus, so this may be controversial. Rocketwidget (talk) 14:33, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Veleno → Veleno (album)Veleno (album) – Joe Veleno is probably the closest to the primary topic for the word Veleno, according to Wikipedia's article traffic statistics the page for the hockey player gets almost 114.5 times more views than the article for the Mina album. However, since people looking for the word Veleno could be searching for topics other than the hockey player, I think it's safe to say that the word Veleno has no primary topic and that the word Veleno should be the title of this disambiguation page, as per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Romeo v. Juliet (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Veleno (disambiguation) → Veleno

• (Discuss) – Kung-Fu Heroes → Chinese Hero (video game)Chinese Hero (video game) – Common name of the game and that of the sources used in the article as a whole. Not necessary to use the name of the NES port without substantially more significant coverage under that name. Go D. Usopp (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Berri–UQAM station → Berri-UQAM stationBerri-UQAM station – Per the ARTM's regional map, the STM's Metro map, the REM map, and the EXO Vaudreuil/Hudson line schedule, these are the correct spellings for each following station. Upon close inspection, Berri-UQAM, Guy-Concordia, and YUL-Aéroport-Montréal-Trudeau each appear to use hyphen-minuses, the proper capitalizations for De l'Église and De la Savane each has a lowercase "l" since it is for definitive articles, and Pincourt–Terrasse-Vaudreuil appears to use an endash between "Pincourt" and "Terrasse-Vaudreuil". OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Vestrian24Bio 09:40, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Guy–Concordia station → Guy-Concordia stationGuy-Concordia station
  • De L'Église station → De l'Église station
  • De La Savane station → De la Savane station
  • YUL–Aéroport-Montréal–Trudeau station → YUL-Aéroport-Montréal-Trudeau stationYUL-Aéroport-Montréal-Trudeau station
  • Pincourt-Terrasse-Vaudreuil station → Pincourt–Terrasse-Vaudreuil station

• (Discuss) – RDA (Avatar) → Resources Development AdministrationResources Development Administration – Per WP:NATURAL. Kailash29792 (talk) 06:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – COVID-19 pandemic in the Solomon Islands → COVID-19 pandemic in Solomon IslandsCOVID-19 pandemic in Solomon Islands – Most other pages say "Solomon Islands" without the "the". I think this should be moved. Jq talk 💬 contributions 21:10, 8 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 21:11, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 06:20, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Dorfromantik (board game) → Dorfromantik: The Board GameDorfromantik: The Board Game – Per WP:NATDIS. Loytra^✨ 05:12, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Wintringham Specialist Aged Care → Wintringham Specialist Aged Care – Wintringham MrWintringham89 (talk) 02:07, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – U.S. history of tobacco minimum purchase age by state → History of tobacco minimum purchase age by U.S. jurisdiction – The articles also include U.S. territories and the District of Columbia, not just the states. Proposed format is similar to that of Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction. cookiemonster755 ^(talk) 17:09, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 23:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • U.S. history of alcohol minimum purchase age by state → History of alcohol minimum purchase age by U.S. jurisdiction

• (Discuss) – Andrew (footballer) → ? – The player is commonly referred to in reliable sources as Andrew Ventura, which is his full and most recognizable name. Misscogumelo (talk) 23:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Aiwo district → Aiwo – This feels like the primary topic for Aiwo. Yaren is just the district and not a DAB (Yaren is the primary topic not Yaren constituency, similar to Aiwo). Jq talk 💬 contributions 18:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 23:34, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aiwo → Aiwo (disambiguation)Aiwo (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Fargo-Moorhead Area Diversion Project → Fargo–Moorhead Area Diversion Project – These are topics associated with the Fargo–Moorhead area or similar pairings of two places, like Calexico–Mexicali, Champaign–Urbana, Dallas–Fort Worth, Detroit–Windsor, Minneapolis–Saint Paul, etc. See also the ongoing RM at Talk:Fargo-Moorhead Symphony Orchestra#Requested move on 22 January 2026. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 23:12, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fargo-Moorhead Bears → Fargo–Moorhead BearsFargo–Moorhead Bears
  • Fargo-Moorhead Beez → Fargo–Moorhead Beez
  • Fargo-Moorhead Fever → Fargo–Moorhead Fever
  • Fargo-Moorhead Graingrowers → Fargo–Moorhead Graingrowers
  • Fargo-Moorhead Jets → Fargo–Moorhead Jets
  • Fargo-Moorhead RedHawks → Fargo–Moorhead RedHawks
  • Fargo-Moorhead Twins → Fargo–Moorhead Twins
  • Fargo-Moorhead Toll Bridge → Fargo–Moorhead Toll Bridge
  • The Forum of Fargo-Moorhead → The Forum of Fargo–Moorhead
  • Champaign-Urbana Symphony Orchestra → Champaign–Urbana Symphony OrchestraChampaign–Urbana Symphony Orchestra
  • Detroit-Windsor Bridge → Detroit–Windsor Bridge
  • USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul → USS Minneapolis–Saint Paul
  • USS Minneapolis-Saint Paul (LCS-21) → USS Minneapolis–Saint Paul (LCS-21)
  • Seattle-Tacoma Box Company → Seattle–Tacoma Box Company
  • Seattle-Tacoma Shipbuilding Corporation → Seattle–Tacoma Shipbuilding Corporation

• (Discuss) – Political divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina → Federal entities of Bosnia and Herzegovina – To clearly differentiate the entities (as they are called in the constitution) from the municipalities and cantons (which are also divisions). FloblinTheGoblin (talk) 22:28, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Stielhandgranate → Stick grenadeStick grenade – With the current renovation and split of the article, i believe it is time to finally move this article to a universal name. Calling it "Stielhandgranate" gives off the wrong idea that the various German models are variants of one another, which is not really the case, and also that all other stick grenades which we cover are direct "copies", which absolutely is not the case. ᛒᛚᚮᚴᚴᚼᛆᛁ ᛭ 𝔅𝔩𝔬𝔠𝔨𝔥𝔞𝔧 20:11, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Wrong Again → Wrong Again (film) – Page views and inbound links between this and the Martina McBride song are about equal, suggesting neither is the primary topic. There are also other works titled "Wrong Again" that do not have a page but would be valid dab entries. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:01, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Zetaquirá → ZetaquiraZetaquira – Correcting misspelling. The official and common name does not use an accent on the final 'a'. OOMagno (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) . . (he/him) 17:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Highmark Stadium (New York) → Ralph Wilson StadiumRalph Wilson Stadium – With this stadium now permanently closed and destined for demolition, we must now determine the common name over the course of its history. Previous discussions have determined that the best title is not necessarily the name at the time of closure (SDCCU Stadium/San Diego Stadium is an example that comes to mind.) With the Highmark Stadium name being transferred to the new facility, "Ralph Wilson Stadium", a name used in a number of reliable sources, seems like a good WP:NATURAL title for this article. 162 etc. (talk) 04:43, 15 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. WikiMacaroons^Cinnamon? 16:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • New Highmark Stadium → Highmark Stadium
  • Highmark Stadium → Highmark Stadium (disambiguation)Highmark Stadium (disambiguation)

• (Discuss) – ShoreZone → ShoreZone coastal mapping – to better describe the article content. Waterbird1199 (talk) 15:34, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Protective Services Battalion → U.S. Army CID Executive Protection Field Office – The U.S. Army changed the name of the Protective Services Battalion to the Executive Protection Field Office following the Criminal Investigation Division's reorganization into a civilian agency. https://www.cid.army.mil/Our-Capabilities/#PSI DevinFrankJarosz (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – APF FC → APF Football ClubAPF Football Club – Articles should be with authentic Full Name, multiple articles with same Name created confusion NiseEdits (talk) 10:29, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Machhindra FC → Machhindra Football ClubMachhindra Football Club – Article should be with their official Name and Short Formated Name creating confusions NiseEdits (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Paolo Pedercini → MolleindustriaMolleindustria – His pseudonym is his WP:COMMONNAME as he is mostly only notable under that name. Rose Abrams (T C L) 10:03, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Shanghai Dragons (ice hockey) → Shanghai Dragons – Five months have passed since the previous discussion. We can now look at pageviews numbers, and they are quite clear; the hockey team is the clear primary topic. The dabpage can be deleted per WP:ONEOTHER. 162 etc. (talk) 05:30, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Shanghai Dragons → Shanghai Dragons (disambiguation)Shanghai Dragons (disambiguation) over redirect without leaving a redirect (implied), then WP:G14 delete if unnecessary

• (Discuss) – Shorea siamensis → Pentacme siamensisPentacme siamensis – Requested since 2017: see below and https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:321155-1 Roy Bateman (talk) 04:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Fargo-Moorhead Symphony Orchestra → Fargo–Moorhead Symphony Orchestra – MOS:NDASH ~2026-45851-3 (talk) 04:20, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Inside Out → Inside Out (disambiguation)Inside Out (disambiguation) – The film is pretty clearly the primary topic by usage. The film gets over 65% of pageviews of anything titled something even remotely like "Inside Out" (first ten here), and the pageviews are 7.8 times the pageviews of the franchise, which is the next highest article (please note that I have limited pageviews to the past year to avoid the 2024 surge in results caused by the release of the sequel). The film fulfills the bar required by WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, as it is "much more likely than any other single topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined" to be sought. The views out of the disambiguation page also reflect this; the film article gets over 60% of the views out of Inside Out, which is more than everything else combined, and over five times the amount of the sequel, which is again the second highest. Note: Please keep in mind that the primary topic is neither what first comes to your mind, nor is it the dictionary definition. Wikipedia does not have an article on the concept of turning an object so that its inner surface faces out, and such an article could not be viable, because it is not an encyclopedic topic. As a result, it is not a contender for the primary topic; only the articles actually listed at the disambiguation page are contenders. There are a number of articles where the primary topic is a specific subject even though it shares a title with a common word or phrase, including Often, Twice, and Tangled. Ladtrack (talk) 04:42, 13 January 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 02:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
  • Inside Out (2015 film) → Inside Out

• (Discuss) – Interstate 75 Kentucky shooting → 2024 Interstate 75 Kentucky shooting2024 Interstate 75 Kentucky shooting – Event appears to fail WP:NOYEAR requirements. A lack of other notable mass shootings on this highway does not imply that a year is not necessary, factors such as how identifiable the incident does, and this incident does not appear to reach that level of notoriety. A year provides simple and effective context to when the incident took place. Raskuly (talk) 01:51, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• (Discuss) – Declaration of the Independence of New Zealand → He WhakaputangaHe Whakaputanga – My primary reason behind this is per WP:COMMONNAME. It is quite clear that He Whakaputanga is the WP:COMMONNAME and has been for quite some time now. Additionally, He Whakaputanga complies with WP:USEENGLISH as it is the WP:COMMONNAME in English RSes as demonstrated: * Google Ngrams with He Whakaputanga and its variations, as well as Declaration of Independence of New Zealand/of the United Tribes of New Zealand and its variants shows He Whakaputanga as demonstrably higher than all others. * Google Trends (worldwide) shows that He Whakaputanga is the WP:COMMONNAME over the past five years worldwide. * Google Trends (New Zealand) shows this by a far more significant margin as well. In the previous move request, key examples were listed that demonstrate the WP:COMMONNAME across books, scholarly articles and news/media per Turnagra: * Scholarly articles: [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55] * Books: [56] [57], [58], [59], * Web and news: [60], [61], [62], [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70] As it has been over a year since the previous move request, there are further examples that can be listed to support that He Whakaputanga is the WP:COMMONNAME: * Prominent news/media: [71] [72] [73] [74] * Academic sources: [75] [76] [77] There are many other sources that use He Whakaputanga, these are just the first few results when I did a Google search and Google scholar search for the past year. Additionally, He Whakaputanga is more WP:PRECISE than "Declaration of the Independence of New Zealand", which is a precision issue, as it conflates He Whakaputanga, which is an independence declaration of the United Tribes of New Zealand with the separate modern-day state of New Zealand. Moreover, it is quite clear that He Whakaputanga is more WP:CONCISE (it being 2 words compared to the status quo of 6). Lastly, moving the article name to He Whakaputanga, reflecting the WP:COMMONNAME in English RSes, as well as it being the primary name for itself in official contexts ensures this article remains neutral per WP:NPOV, reflecting current consensus from academia and RSes, instead of outdated descriptive terms. While I think this RM should be on the basis of the evidence and policy arguments I provided alone, I also think that it is helpful to note my experience; I have been a law student for around 4 years now, and in all of the study on the topic, and legal sources that I have encountered, He Whakaputanga has been near-exclusively referred to as He Whakaputanga, sometimes with a transliteration in its first occurrence. Carolina2k22 • (talk) 23:45, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]