This talk page is for discussion of Wikipedia policies and procedures related to userboxes. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Userboxes page.
|
Non-free images may not be used in userboxes. |
{{yy}} templates do not render properly when indented (using : ) or bulleted (using * ). Do not use either when replying to messages using {{yy}} templates. |
Text has been copied to or from this page; see the list below. The source pages now serve to provide attribution for the content in the destination pages and must not be deleted as long as the copies exist. For attribution and to access older versions of the copied text, please see the history links below.
|
Template:Userbox sample compact
{{Userbox sample compact}} used on wp:userboxes#Userbox sampling templates was deleted. Is there an alternative or should that section be deleted? Thank you Adakiko (talk) 23:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- added an
{{update}}
- akesi akise 19:08, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Standardized documentation
On a quick search, I'm not seeing any {{Userbox documentation}} template providing a standardized documentation for user boxes. This seems like something that should exist and be used. Sdkb talk 18:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- I can make that. Would you like me to start it? thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 21:27, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdkb thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 21:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TheTechie, sure, feel free to! Rolling it out widely may be the more significant challenge. Sdkb talk 21:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Sdkb I now have a skeleton of a documentation. You (or anyone else watching this page) is free to improve it, and give feedback on the template talk page. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- (at the template link above) thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 01:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, I'd start by using {{Documentation}} in it... Sdkb talk 04:12, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- @TheTechie, sure, feel free to! Rolling it out widely may be the more significant challenge. Sdkb talk 21:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- FYI, there are also shared documentation templates {{Userbox/categories}} and {{Userbox/citydoc}}. —andrybak (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Creating large userboxes
I want my userpage to be only userboxes scaled up in a 2 column grid that takes up the entire width of the article. Currently I use a CSS hack using the scale property to achieve this. Unfortunately, it fails to take into account smaller resolutions entirely. Any Wikitext-smiths have a solution to my (frivolous) problem? -1ctinus📝🗨 01:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- User:1ctinus, to avoid the blurriness, you're going to have to re-implement all the userboxes with Template:Userbox-w.
Scaled + CSS hacks, blurred
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Userbox-w, not blurred
| ||
---|---|---|
|
- —andrybak (talk) 21:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the template recommendation. Is there a way to run a find/replace for tables? the String replace invoke methods failed for me. -1ctinus📝🗨 23:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- I finally figured out the solution, and it's really dumb. To make the replace work, I had to turn it into an HTML table, and to replace, I added these extremely hacky lines:
{{#invoke:String|replace|{{#invoke:String|replace|{{#invoke:String|replace|(stuff)|width:238px|width:476px}}|45px|90px}}|font-size:8pt|font-size:16pt}}
- If this isn't a hack I don't know what is, but it's working really well (except for small images) -1ctinus📝🗨 00:21, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Centralize Userboxes
I had an idea, why not centralize all userboxes using "Userbox:" or "UB:"(Just like Wikipedia: or User:) and put the entire Userbox database to organize it a little. I made a simple Userbox: website for this idea And will make this my #1 priority (if you like it) Userbox:Hoster
Cheers, Arotparaarms (talk) 02:02, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- seems like a ` if it ain't broke don't fix it ` to me
- akizet talk 20:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Update wording of "Cautions about image use"
The wording of the WP:UBX#Caution about image use subsection probably should be tweaked because fair use on Wikipedia is better referred to as non-free content because Wikipedia's non-free content use policy is actually more restrictive than fair use by design, and it's because of the this policy (WP:NFCC#9) that non-free images aren't allowed to be used in userboxes. You could actually argue that such a use would be allowed under "fair use", but that's not really what's relevant here. Using "non-free content" and "fair use content" interchangeably often leads to problems whenever such files are discussed because many mistakenly assume they're one and the same; so, it's better not to do so on policy/guideline pages whenever possible. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)