This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bavaria This page is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria Germany This page is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany

Archives

1

I tagged War of the Bavarian Succession and Hermann Detzner with the project template. These are both FA articles. I also added them to one of the charts as examples of high and low priority, plus a couple of others that are top. Just trying to help out, not being officious. ;). The chart that shows the categorization of articles seems to be coded to Munich, not to the Bavaria project. Auntieruth55 (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Munich can do the Munich articles. But you might want to have a Nuremberg Task Force. Kingjeff (talk) 15:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 1583 Siege of Godesberg has been nominated for Featured Article. This was a Bavarian victory that resulted in confirmation of the Wittelsbach ascendancy in the Electorate of Cologne for the next two centuries (plus a little). A sister article Cologne War has already passed FAC. The present nominee could use additional reviewers. auntieruth (talk) 17:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know Bavaria-related articles are still being created, but is this project still active? I hope it is. Calistemon (talk) 12:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A good few of the registered members are floating around editing but I think the project is dead as such. I came to check myself after seeing that the portal had not been maintained for ages. Any questions --> WT:GER more chance of an answer Agathoclea (talk) 13:41, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, one major article within this project's scope is still missing: Munich Metropolitan Region. It could be created using information from the German article. Do you think you can do something about it? Thank you and prost, Horst-schlaemma (talk) 14:26, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion may be of interest to members of this project. Beyond My Ken (talk) 01:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear portal members,

The article of the Feodor-Lynen-Gymnasium Planegg in Germany has been created recently by a students group of this school. May the project please check the hole article in order to correct some language mistakes that are maybe still in article? That would be fine!

Have a nice day!

Best regards and thank you in advance,
FEOteacher2019 (talk) 04:46, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC may be of interest to the members of this project. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Battle of Blenheim for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. (t · c) buidhe 02:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This discussion may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Empress Elisabeth of Austria#Requested move 1 May 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 04:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a merge request at Talk:Munich Massacre that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Any input would be very welcome! Felix QW (talk) 17:17, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Beatrice of Bavaria#Requested move 1 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Reading Beans 08:02, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]