This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Florida State University This page is within the scope of WikiProject Florida State University, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Florida State University on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Florida State UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Florida State UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Florida State UniversityFlorida State University

• I took the liberty of categorizing all of the FSU articles. I also added the alumni as well. I did not add the athletes, or the faculty yet. I will do this soon. Jccort (talk) 20:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I do not expect you guys to add information to all of these articles, I just wanted to be known that these articles are under our jurisdiction, and to make it easier to monitor their updates. Thanks Jccort (talk) 20:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Only 3 total FSU Presidents have articles written about them. I think it is important that in the future we work on this project. Presidents of Florida State University

Thanks, Jccort (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone unwilling to compromise--UkrNole 485 (talk) 00:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

some people like that guy has no life but to edit Wiki 24/7. it is sad--Nolephin (talk) 12:37, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Florida State University alumni - This article contains numerous notable FSU Alumni who do not have articles created yet. I am worried that User:Tim Ross may do a mass purge before we can debate exactly who should remain in the article and who should be deleted. I propose that we vote in a Democratic fashion who should be deleted, and who should be kept. Jccort (talk) 17:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI... Wikipedia is not a democracy we can't have a vote... you can call for concensus. See Wikipedia:Consensus. You can direct people to contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Florida State University alumni and attempt to alter the article as concensus dictates. We now have a message here to bring it to everyone's attention so that should serve well. If you want to call for an informal straw poll on Talk:List of Florida State University alumni in order toget concensus then that may be acceptable (although somewhat discouraged).--Dr who1975 (talk) 19:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone interested in this topic would be advised to read this discussion, where it was discussed in Dec 07, and this one which I initiated in Apr 08, not realizing that User:Jccort had deleted the earlier discussion (which I have now replaced). Both are at Talk:List of Florida State University alumni. You might also wish to read my communication of this date with User:Jccort, here which seems to have caused the message above, and his response on my talk page.

User: Jccort seems to fear an immediate "mass purge" from me, although my interest, as I have stated again and again, is to get the list improved, either through the creation of articles for the alumni deserving of them or by references to their notable accomplishments and alumni status being provided. I have no special knowledge of alumni who deserve to be listed and those who don't, merely a desire for proper referencing and fact checking. This is not, I think, really a matter for "a vote in a Democratic fashion", but rather a matter of following Wikipedia's limited number of rules. Tim Ross (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we're all assuming good faith... let's continue this discussion at Talk:List of Florida State University alumni.--Dr who1975 (talk) 19:13, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've recently been examining some of the lists involving people associated with FSU. There are at least four of them: List of Florida State University alumni, List of Florida State University athletic alumni, List of Florida State University faculty, and List of Florida State University people. As one might expect, the overlap is great and much of the information is repetitive. Maintenance is difficult and the arrangement is probably not especially helpful for most users. I picked a few large or well-known schools in the country to see how others had handled the situation. University of Miami has 2 (alumni & faculty). So does University of Florida (people & faculty and administrators) and Notre Dame (alumni & athletes). University of Alabama, University of Georgia, UCLA, and Harvard manage to get by with just one (people). A single list encompassing all FSU "people" (which we already have), would, I think, be the most useful to encyclopedia users and, perhaps, to editors as well. And, it probably wouldn't be overwhelmingly difficult to merge the three other articles into "people". What do you think? Tim Ross (talk) 10:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, 320 articles are assigned to this project, of which 270, or 84.4%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 14 July 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place a template on your project page.

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is a request for comment about whether or not WP:BOOSTER documents a standard consensus and good practice that all editors and school/college/university articles should follow as an official policy or guideline. Madcoverboy (talk) 19:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All WikiProjects are invited to have their "milestone-reached" announcements automatically placed onto Wikipedia's announcements page. Milestones could include the number of FAs, GAs or articles covered by the project. No work need be done by the project themselves; they just need to provide some details when they sign up. A bot will do all of the hard work. Click here for more information or to sign your project up.

I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:09, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

I have done a GA Reassessment of the Florida State University article as part of the GA Sweeps project. My review is here. It is my opinion that the article does not meet the current GA Criteria. There are several dead links, areas of the article that need to be referenced, and a general tone to the article that does not appear neutral. I have placed the article on hold for a week and I am notifying all interested projects and editors. Please contact me on my talk page should you have questions. H1nkles (talk) 21:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I recently completed the initial phase of a major re-write of the Albert A. Murphree article. For those of you FSU alumni who do not immediately recognize Jennie Murphree's husband, Albert was the 3rd president of proto-FSU when it went through a dizzying succession of name changes and became an all-women's school in 1905. Murphree became the 2nd president of the University of Florida in 1908, the only time the two schools have ever swapped a leader.

Given that most of the available internet resources emphasize his time as president of the University of Florida (1909-1927), the article as it presently stands is admittedly light on a discussion of Murphree's accomplishments as president of West Florida Seminary/Florida State College/Florida Female College/Florida State College for Women as it evolved during the protean years of Murphree's presidency (1897-1909). I would be grateful if someone who is knowledgeable about available FSU references covering these years would make a recommendation of available and reliable references for this era of FSU history. At a bare minimum, the article should include another paragraph discussing Murphree's accomplishments in Tallahassee. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 21:19, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:18, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects provides a list, updated daily, of unreferenced living people articles (BLPs) related to your project. There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles, so it is important that these articles are referenced.

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at >>>Wikipedia:WikiProject Florida State University/Unreferenced BLPs<<<

If you do not want this wikiproject to participate, please add your project name to this list.

Thank you.

Update: Wikipedia:WikiProject Florida State University/Unreferenced BLPs has been created. This list, which is updated by User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects daily, will allow your wikiproject to quickly identify unreferenced living person articles.

There maybe no or few articles on this new Unreferenced BLPs page. To increase the overall number of articles in your project with another bot, you can sign up for User:Xenobot_Mk_V#Instructions.

If you have any questions or concerns, visit User talk:DASHBot/Wikiprojects. Okip 00:59, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can we get some additional eyes on History of Florida State University? I've identified some problems with sourcing and original synthesis that need to be addressed, but overall it's quite a good article and could probably pass for WP:GA with some work.--Cúchullain ^t/c 15:16, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone update the pages for FSU and the Florida State University College of Visual Arts, Theatre And Dance? The college recently underwent a name change to "College of Fine Arts" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbv08 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Florida State University articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has been suggested that this project is Inactive and it might be beneficial to add it to the supported projects list of WikiProject United States. After reviewing the project page and talk page it appears that no edits have been made to either since late 2010 and the project is marked as inactive. Due to the existing Inactive tag I am going to add it to the supported projects list. If anyone has comments or questions please let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 00:28, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since it has been 8 days since this discussion began, it appears this project is inactive and it appears that there are no problems with this proposal I am going to go ahead and add this project to the supported projects list. --Kumioko (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I never thought to come into the talk. I have semi-recently become involved with this project and have been working to improve some of the articles in it. I would not consider it inactive and hope that it would remain in its current form. Thanks. Hopefully my work comes to something. Ayzmo (talk) 20:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Florida learned ones ! I asked (twice) this question in WP english Reference Desk, and "Wehwalt" told me that maybe you had the answer...

When I translated into WP fr the WP en articles David Stuart (Michigan politician) & political general , I wondered about the possible interferences between 2 of them : Stuart & John A. McClernand ... So I asked  : " It seems that before and during the Vicksburg Campaign D. Stuart has been faithfull to Sherman and Grant rather to John A. McClernand. He resigned from the Union Army in April, 1863.

Are there any proofs that D. Stuart's nomination as brig.gen. was refused by the US Senate because McClernand's friends vetoed against it ?"

Thanks ++++ beforehand for your answers (maybe a book : "Meyers, Christopher C. « The Meanest Man in the West: John A. McClernand and the Civil War Era. » Ph. D. Diss., The Florida State University, 1996. can help; it is perfectly unavailable here...).

And BTW,since I'm writing to Florida, could you please in someway carry my thanks to the Florida people in general for their kindness - and specially to the Miami Airport administration : 2 years ago, while waiting there for a plane after a very good stay, I discovered thanks to their wall posters an early photographer : Claude C. Matlack, which allowed me to learn about him (and write an article in WP french...). Cheers, Arapaima (talk) 10:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that I am trying to reinvigorate the ACC Wikiproject. Please feel free to stop by for a look. CrazyPaco (talk) 07:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This project may be affected by a proposed consolidation of inactive and semi-active WikiProjects covering universities. The proposed consolidation is being discussed on the talk page of WikiProject Universities. We are seeking feedback from the projects that may be impacted before we decide on a course of action. Please drop by to participate in the discussion. Thanks! –Mabeenot (talk) 06:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at the College Basketball Wikiproject for forming a consensus on the creation of a basic navigation template for college basketball teams. CrazyPaco (talk) 09:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The opening sentence makes it sound like the university and the Seninoles are equal in importance. Repeated in next paragraph. That's how I read it, and it bothers me. Is this typical of FSU? Treating its athletic teams as worthy of separate mention next to the university's name? deisenbe (talk) 14:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all! I'm looking for an experienced editor to help me lead an edit-a-thon on Nov. 3rd, at the Center of Global Engagement. Article subjects will be related to the Bridges across Cultures contest, so all target articles will be in Arabic, Persian, Turkish, Spanish and Portuguese. I'll present an introductory talk on what Wikipedia is and how to edit, but I'll need someone to help me check and give support to students while they're editing. Please contact me either here or at Dodd Hall, room 322. Thanks, Domusaurea (talk) 23:44, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   10:57, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I now live in the Tallahassee area and began looking at Wiki FSU articles to learn more about the University. It seems like nobody has been updating the subject in the last few years. I read a Tallahassee Democrat article that talked about the University Center, but found nothing on Wikipedia, so I decided to change that. Anybody else still interested? Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 01:51, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what I've done so far:

New articles: Dale W. Lick, Dodd Hall, Florida State University Board of Trustees, FSU Legacy Walk, Gordon W. Blackwell, John E. Champion, Legacy Hall, President's House (Florida State University), Student Union (Florida State University), University Center (Florida State University), Landmarks and Monuments of Florida State University, List of Florida State University honorary degree recipients, List of Florida State University Torch Award recipients, Ruby Diamond

Rewritten articles: Florida State University student housing, Bernard F. Sliger, J. Stanley Marshall, T. K. Wetherell, Virginia Bass Wetherell

Update Edits: List of presidents of Florida State University
Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 19:49, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currently working on List of Buildings at Florida State University. Mgrē@sŏn (Talk) 01:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm proposing to merge this and other inactive higher education-related wikiprojects to WikiProject Higher education. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Higher education#Merge of inactive higher education wikiprojects. – Joe (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (associated with FSU) needs help with editing and verifying the WikiPage for our new Director, Kathleen Amm. We appreciate any and all help in getting this published by Wikimedia. Thank you so much! MagnetWiki (talk) 15:23, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]