This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Central Asia: Kazakhstan Wikipedia:WikiProject Kazakhstan is part of WikiProject Central Asia, a project to improve all Central Asia-related articles. This includes but is not limited to Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Tajikistan, Tibet, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Xinjiang and Central Asian portions of Iran, Pakistan and Russia, region-specific topics, and anything else related to Central Asia. If you would like to help improve this and other Central Asia-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.Central AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Central AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Central AsiaCentral Asia This page is supported by WikiProject Kazakhstan.

This page was nominated for deletion on 2008 February 3. The result of the discussion was Speedy Close.

An RfC on moving the year from the end to the start of article titles (e.g. South African general election, 2019 to 2019 South African general election) has been reopened for further comment, including on whether a bot could be used move the articles if it closed in favour of the change: Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (government and legislation)#Proposed change to election/referendum naming format. Cheers, Number 57 15:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Could anyone provide feedback on this draft? Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Soviet_Union#Display_Russian_names_in_footnotes_of_locations_in_the_former_Soviet_Union? for a discussion on whether the Russian names should be put in footnotes in articles about former Soviet Union locations (which existed at the time of the Soviet Union) WhisperToMe (talk) 08:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From 1 October to 31 December, Women in Red is running a virtual contest on Asian women. In November, this will coincide with Wikipedia Asian Month. We look forward to strong participation from all those interested in improving coverage of women from Kazakhstan.--Ipigott (talk) 19:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm compiling a list of the first women MPs in each country, but have been unable to find the answer for Kazakhstan. I'm guessing they would have been an early member(s) of the Supreme Soviet of the Kazakh SSR, the Congress of Soviets or the Supreme Soviet of the USSR. If anyone can point me to a definitive source, it would be much appreciated. Cheers, Number 57 17:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m proposing renaming every article in the form of, for example, Akhtyrka Uyezd → Akhtyrka Uezd, to match the spelling of the renamed main article Uezd. Please discuss at talk:Uezd#Rename articles about uezds for consistency. —Michael Z. 22:16, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a recent edit to the article First Lady of Kazakhstan that looks like it may be vandalism. However, I don't have deep knowledge of the country, so it might just an unsourced yet correct edit. I wanted to raise it to this project where people might have knowledge. After the divorce of current President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, someone named Danny Nakamura is listed as the new First Lady. However, there is no source for this claim, no information in the biographical article about Tokayev about this supposed new First Lady, and no wikilink to an article about Ms. Nakamura. Does anyone know whether this is vandalism or accurate information? Thanks. JamesAM (talk) 18:07, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it looks like vandalism, and it was unsourced anyway. I have removed it.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:25, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

• John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:KAZAKHNAMES says “For Kazakh language, BGN/PCGN romanization of Kazakh is typically used.” But I notice that the articles on Tokayev and Nazarbayev, and some others, use the Latin Kazakh in the lead instead, in contradiction to the example given there. Is this now the convention in use?

It seems to make sense to use the Kazakh Latin (or should I say Qazaq Latin?).

Shall we update the guideline?  —Michael Z. 05:43, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not think there is consensus to use Kazakh Latin. In a year or two it would become official, and then romanization would not be needed. Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was wondering if some members of this WikiProject could take a look at List of wars involving Kazakhstan.There are some MOS:COLOR issues (at least in my opinion) that need to be addressed, but the main thing is that there's seems to be an edit war brewing based upon some recent edits that have been made by some SPAs and the edit summaries that were left for them. If someone knowledgeable about the subject matter could take a look and determine the last good stable version of the article, then perhaps the article could be protected and these SPA could instead be encouraged to use the article talk page to discuss things. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I protected the article for two weeks, and some of the edit summaries are not really encouraging. Ymblanter (talk) 11:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aykin Tolepbergen is an actor, the page needs additions. Xx236 (talk) 09:49, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zarina Diyas has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiProject Kazakhstan:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 13:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Input is needed to close a discussion on deleting and merging a number of categories at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 19#Category:Russian and Soviet emigrants to Albania. Thanks.  —Michael Z. 05:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I don't know that much about Kazakhstan nor have any connection to the country, but I have been reading Wikipedia and have been finding that several articles still contain "Nur-Sultan" in their titles or body text. Is there a guideline on where to use Nur-Sultan vs. Astana in articles? Specifically, if an event (e.g. election, sports match etc) occurred while the capital's name was Nur-Sultan, do we use Nur-Sultan for that article or do we change that to Astana? Similarly, if something was established while the city was named Nur-Sultan, do we use Nur-Sultan or Astana for that as well? Thanks. Prodraxis _(talk) 20:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think this is pretty much as other renamed cities: If an event took place when the name of the city wass Nursultan, it should be as a rule referred to as Nursultan. (Note also that though it was called Astana before and after Nursultan, it was still called Akmolinsk, Tselinograd, and Akmola before Astana). Ymblanter (talk) 16:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, I have been finding that across multiple wikis (including en.wp), the capital of Kazakhstan is still called Nur-Sultan, not Astana in inappropriate places against WP:MOS guidelines (see User:Prodraxis/Astana for more info). I have recently come across the article Nur-Sultan Zhas Ulan Republican School while looking for examples of such MOS errors to fix. Now, AFAIK a lot of establishments (e.g. Barys Astana) have changed their names from containing Nur-Sultan to containing Astana when the capital was renamed back to Astana, and I want to know if this is the case for the Nur-Sultan Zhas Ulan Republican School article as well. I tried to google some stuff in English, but I couldn't find anything regarding the school's name, and I don't understand any Russian or Kazakh either and I can't read Cyrillic. Can any Russian or Kazakh speakers help out with this? Thanks. Prodraxis _(talk) 14:42, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nvm, please disregard this message - a few days ago, I decided to move the page's title to Astana Zhas Ulan Republican School partly because other articles were named e.g. Almaty Zhas Ulan Republican School and the naming conventions seemed consistently to put the name of the city in front of "Zhas Ulan Republican School" with regards to these articles. Prodraxis _(talk) 15:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Starting this July, we will see a new contest on the scene - the Developing Countries WikiContest (WP:DCWC)! Think of it as a WikiCup but only for articles and media on developing countries.

Competitors may submit GAs, GTs, FAs, FTs, FLs, FPs, and DYK and ITN entries from/on developing countries to gain points and proceed to further rounds. Points are also awarded to those who review GAs, FAs and FLs.

Kazakhstan is listed as a developing country for the purposes of this contest, so articles related to it are eligible to be submitted to the contest. I encourage everyone here to sign up and compete with editors from around the world to create high-quality content!

Append your name to the DCWC signup page today!

Best wishes, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_{my edits}) 08:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would anyone be interested in joining a sub project of WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 19:33, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WikiProject Kazakhstan:

WikiProject Women in Green is holding a month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2024!

Running from October 1 to 31, 2024, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts.

We hope to see you there!

Grnrchst (talk) 11:41, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]