This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Regional and national music Wikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national music is within the scope of the WikiProject Regional and national music, an attempt at building a resource on the music of all the peoples and places of the world. Please visit the project's listing to see the article's assessment and to help us improve the article as we push to 1.0.Regional and national musicWikipedia:WikiProject Regional and national musicTemplate:WikiProject Regional and national musicRegional and national music

To edit the above box, go to Template:WikiProject World music.

Archives

Archive 1 - Archive 2

Is there any chance this project will become active again? - AKeen 18:33, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There's always a chance. I'm still interested and still work in this area, and User:Smmurphy recently expressed an interest in it. Tuf-Kat 03:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested, especially in the realm of South American music - AKeen 23:02, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ok, so two people is a quorum, right. TUF-KAT is a third, do we really need five, or can we call the project "open" and have some fun with it? Smmurphy

I'd also be interested in this project. I've been working on some of the Zimbabwean music-related pages, becacuse that's what I'm most interested in and know the most about, but I'd be happy to help with other articles as much as I can. Alex Weeks 15:18, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What sorts of project would everyone be interested. I don't think there's enough people for a CotW. I've made some goals that we could all work towards, if anyone's interested. Other suggestions? Tuf-Kat 17:32, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that a COTW would be untenable. But I do have some suggestions. A lot of the work done in the past has been poorly referenced. One easier project would be to update the reference formats in the FAs, and then in the "Music of *"s. Another, more pressing project is improving the article on world music. Could it be a FA someday? Also, that article should have no redlinks, we could make stubs and articles for those bands.Smmurphy 18:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We could also try to implement something similar to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemicals/Assessment. Updating references would be useful, though I suspect it may not work as well as we want (all of us here are into world music, we probably could pretty easily find refs for music of Cuba, music of Ireland, etc, but once we're done tripping over each other in those articles, we'll be stuck scrounging around for sources for music of Belarus and music of Djibouti -- not that that would be an altogether terrible thing, but it might not be the most productive use of our time). Tuf-Kat 05:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The default category for template:Worldmusic assessed is the same as the one used by template:WikiProject World music, redirecting the template would make editing the page slightly simpler (no need to change template). Circeus 04:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are two criteria basically used to determine if a project qualifies for deletion. These are no activity on the project page for 3 months and no listed members. Right now, this project has no listed members, as it has no list. This could potentially prompt someone else to list it for deletion. Please remedy this situation. Badbilltucker 23:36, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. The WikiProject Council is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages:

• User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory,
• User:Badbilltucker/Culture Directory 2,
• User:Badbilltucker/Philosophy and religion Directory,
• User:Badbilltucker/Sports Directory,
• User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory,
• User:Badbilltucker/Geographical Directory/United States, (note: This page will be retitled to more accurately reflect its contents)
• User:Badbilltucker/History and society directory, and
• User:Badbilltucker/Science directory

and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 21:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now put the new draft in the old directory pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you. B2T2 00:25, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning cross-post.

See Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team#Stablepedia. If you wish to comment, please comment there. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 23:44, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

End cross-post. Please do not comment more in this section.

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded on the project page a little more; I stole a few bits and pieces from Wikipedia:WikiProject Calvinism, which has gone from 0-20+ members in about 2 months. If there are no objections, I will also at some point:

• Make a News page like the one at WPCalvinism: Like Wikipedia:WikiProject Calvinism/News
• Make a Welcome template like the one at WPCalvinism: Like Wikipedia:WikiProject Calvinism/Outreach/Welcome

-- TimNelson 10:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim - I've added my name to the project page. Not sure how active I can be but I'll help out when I can. Today, I updated the project page further - fixed some formatting problems with the layout, and added some goals to the list.

I invite others to please review the goals and scope I added to make sure I didn't add anything you don't want there. If you feel I made it too wide, then maybe a separate project would be needed for some of the fusion and preservation concerns I listed. I think it can be good here, but if you don't want it, go ahead and remove or change it. Maybe it's too ambitious and a separate project would be better for that, though I notice that some of the people here like fusion forms like Celtic fusion and Electric folk, so maybe it's a good fit.

Either way, no worries... --Parzival418 _Hello 02:18, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I see the main goal of the project itself as being to help other groups organise, either as sub-projects or task forces. But between this project and the subprojects, we should be able to cover all these goals. I don't think it's too broad, as long as those musics relate to the region somehow. I guess I don't want people to confuse this project with Wikipedia:WikiProject Roots music (which I don't think you're doing). -- TimNelson 06:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. I think that one of the problems with the World music project is that the scope is so broad that people aren't interested. For exapmle, I'm interested in Electric Folk (ie. British folk rock; think Steeleye Span and the like), and a little interested in eg. Celtic folk, and a few other folk musics of the Western European world (Flamenco, Finnish folk, some American folk, etc), but the term "World music" is so broad that it covers lots of stuff that I don't want to work on, so I didn't sign up for a long time.

My thought as to how to resolve this problem is that we could form task forces; for example, I think a "Celtic folk music" task force would attract a fair number of people who wouldn't be attracted to a "World music" project by itself.

Thoughts?

-- TimNelson 10:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original comment: TimNelson 01:47, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There were a number of requests for expertise on this page that no-one appears to have responded to. As well as archiving them, I thought I'd summarise them here too:

• There were a number of requests for articles which don't yet exist; these are now listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject World music/to do/Requested_articles
• User:Smmurphy requested copyediting of his Native American music articles. His edits can be found at List of Native American musicians (see history). Requested Decemberish 2005.
• User:ProhibitOnions requested NPOV and relevancy revision of Music of Eastern Europe in April 2006, and said that possibly the article could be improved by being deleted and replaced with more specific articles, and the article Western music.
• User:Angr requested expansion of Mohamed Nuur Giriig in May 2006.
• User:Paul foord requested discussion of categorisation at Talk:Indigenous music in June 2006
• User:msh210 requested discussion of a new title for Shiny Shoe Music in September 2006 (Done, see below)

If you feel you've done any of these, mark your name next to them.

I have just finished a complete rewrite of the Music of Israel. For user msh210: it includes a section on Hassidic rock, which I think is what you mean by Shiny Shoe Music. Everyone is invited to review, correct, add salient info, and in general behave in the wiki spirit.

--Ravpapa 16:38, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this -- very timely as someone was about to delete the redirect from "Shiny Shoe Music". -- TimNelson 01:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all. I'm suggesting (see Wikipedia:WikiProject_World_music/Definitions) that this project be split into a "Geographically-based Music" project, and a "Roots music" project. Please discuss on the page that I linked.

-- TimNelson 00:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, this has been done. -- TimNelson 02:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article is currently under good article review. See the talk page for details. T Rex | talk 23:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Are "First Prize at the Kazakhstan National Piano Competition, and later the Gold Medal of the National Festival of the Arts" notable? Do they even exist? If so, please comment at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitri Novgorodsky. Canuckle 23:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This weeks WP:CHICOTW is My Kind of Town (Sinatra song). Does that count as Regional and national music? If so, come by help with the article and slap your tag on our talk page if you have one? —Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyTheTiger (talk • contribs) 00:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if there is anyone out there? If so, take a look at Music of Israel. It is rated as start class. I personally think it is worthy of FA, but then, I wrote it (with a lot of help from my friends). If there is anyone following this project, I would appreciate a reassessment.

Tnx, --Ravpapa 14:43, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a proposal to merge a new article, Karnataka/Carnatic music, into Music of Karnataka. There is no consensus at this point and input from people knowledgeable in the subject area and Wikipedia policy would be helpful. See the discussion at Talk:Music of Karnataka#Merge proposal. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 13:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article is going under FAR here because I believe it no longer meets the criteria. Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 03:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

• The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
• The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
• A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {^ταλκ_{κοντριβς} – WP Physics} 09:36, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

I have nominated Music of Minnesota for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (help the Invincibles Featured topic drive) 02:37, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:

1. supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
2. opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

List of cleanup articles for your project

If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here

Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "[[WP

Incubation|incubation pages"

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip

Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip

Ikip 05:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Regional and national music articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Music of Maryland for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 16:59, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Music of Africa, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:06, 29 February 2016 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team[reply]

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Please note that Jazz Age, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team[reply]