Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,837 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Nawa Sugiyama (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 9 days ago by Junhan0001 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 9 days ago by Theroadislong

Submission declined on 6 December 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by SafariScribe 10 days ago. Last edited by Theroadislong 9 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

• Comment: Please correct the referencing, see WP:REFB for advice. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:51, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Nawa Sugiyama is an anthropological archaeologist, who specialized in studying ritual landscapes, zooarchaeology, human-animal interactions and isotope dating.^[1] She mainly focuses on Mesoamerica city Teotihuacan.

Ph.D. Anthropology, Harvard University (2014) Dissertation: Animals and Sacred Mountains: How Ritualized Performances Materialized State-Ideologies at Teotihuacan, Mexico.^[2] mainly focus on large carnivores been sacrificed and deposited as offerings in large-scale dedicatory rituals and human-animal interactions characterized by dominance and control of the most powerful beast on the landscape.

M.A., Anthropology, Harvard University (2010)

B.A., Anthropology, Arizona State University (2005)^[3]

Nawa Sugiyama's research primarily focuses on the construction of ritualized landscapes, human-animal interactions, and the deposition of large carnivores as offerings. Regarding her fieldwork on the ritual landscape of Teotihuacan, her research included detailed studies of the architectural features and subterranean structures within the Pyramid of the Sun. Her findings provide evidence that the tunnels beneath the Pyramid were artificially constructed, containing burials and offerings for ritual purposes. This fieldwork also reveals the three stages of construction of the Sun Pyramid and presents new results from ceramic and radiocarbon dating, indicating that the Pyramid and its subterranean tunnels were built between A.D. 170–310 and A.D. 140–240^[4].

Sugiyama’s research on human-animal interactions and the deposition of large carnivores as offerings underscores the unique role that animals played in Teotihuacan rituals. Her study of animal burials beneath the Pyramid of the Moon reveals large-scale offerings of dangerous carnivores that were native to the local environment. The placement of these animals reflects Indigenous place-thought and ritual significance.^[5]

Her work also explored the life histories of these animals in relation to Teotihuacan, including the management and captivity of ritual apex predators for sacrifice, and their role in rituals associated with monumentalism and the state. Additionally, her research examined ancient Indigenous place-thought and its influence on these practices.^[6]

Sugiyama's research further extends to the dating of archaeological sites using bone isotope zooarchaeology. In her studies, ATR-FTIR analysis revealed minimal inter-species differences in isotopic composition, suggesting the feasibility of using remains from less valuable mammals alongside human remains for rapid preliminary screening to assess site preservation^[7][8]