Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,806 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Ubie (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 10 days ago by UmIgu (talk: D · +) · Last edited 7 days ago by UmIgu

Submission declined on 2 November 2024 by JSFarman (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by JSFarman 43 days ago. Last edited by UmIgu 7 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 8 October 2024 by Drmies (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Drmies 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 8 October 2024 by Drmies (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Drmies 2 months ago.

• Comment: The Ubie corporate website is not an independent source. None of the references used here go towards notability. JSFarman (talk) 05:10, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Removing press releases is only one of the necessary steps. Can you please actually work on this before resubmitting? This is taking up volunteer time. Drmies (talk) 19:55, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Looks like promotional writing, with PR sources. Drmies (talk) 19:47, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Ubie Inc.

Company type	Corporation
Industry	Healthcare service
Founded	2017; 7 years ago (2017)
Founders	Yoshimichi Abe Kota Kubo
Headquarters	Tokyo, Japan
Area served	United States, Japan
Net income	¥3.843 billion (2023)
Total assets	¥1.908 billion (2023)
Number of employees	280 (2023)
Website	ubiehealth.com

Ubie Inc. is a health technology company founded in 2017, specializing in artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for healthcare. The company is known for its AI-powered symptom checker, which aims to enhance patient care and improve diagnostic accuracy.^[1][2][3]

Ubie was co-founded by physician Yoshinori Abe and machine learning engineer Kota Kubo. The company emerged from research focused on leveraging AI to analyze symptoms and diseases. Since its inception, Ubie has aimed to make healthcare more accessible through innovative technology.^[4][5]

Ubie's flagship product, the AI Symptom Checker, is recognized for its accuracy and effectiveness. This technology has been integrated into various healthcare settings, including partnerships with major hospitals.^[6][7][8][9] The AI technology in Ubie's symptom checker employs advanced algorithms to analyze patient-reported symptoms and provide potential diagnoses, validated through clinical studies.^{[10][11][12][13][14]}

Ubie has established several strategic partnerships to enhance its offerings. In collaboration with the American Kidney Fund, Ubie aims to improve early diagnosis and education regarding kidney diseases.^[15][16] This partnership focuses on utilizing AI to expedite the diagnostic process and enhance patient outcomes. Additionally, Ubie has partnered with PatientsLikeMe to improve patient journeys through AI technology.^[17] Furthermore, Ubie has worked with the Cushing's Syndrome Research Foundation to develop AI tools for diagnosing rare diseases, showcasing its commitment to addressing complex health challenges.^{[18][19][20][21][22]}

In August 2022, Ubie raised $26.2 million to scale its AI-powered symptom checker, furthering its mission to enhance healthcare accessibility.^[23] The company has also received investment from Google to advance its digital health initiatives, particularly in generative AI.^[24][25] Ubie has gained recognition in international markets, particularly in New York, where it has found a supportive business environment for startups.^[26] Ubie's initiatives have been acknowledged for their potential impact on patient outcomes, including self-monitoring and data sharing to enhance healthcare delivery. The company aims to empower patients through its technology, contributing to better health management.^{[27][28][29][30]}

In 2024, Ubie was recognized as one of the "World's Best Digital Health Companies" by Newsweek, highlighting its innovative contributions to healthcare technology. This recognition underscores Ubie's role in advancing digital health solutions and its commitment to improving patient care.^[31]