This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Neutrality
The first section seems to be written with an opinionated undertone.Moonboy54 (talk) 06:08, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- This no longer seems to be the case. Aurodea108 (talk) 06:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
Revamp
Hey, guys, would you mind if you just left this alone while I work in? Much obliged. THE KC (talk) 01:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC).
- Sorry, no can do. Don't have enough tmie now. THE KC (talk) 23:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC).
Discrepancy in argue date
Hi. LexisNexis seems to list the argue date for this case as October 15.
JAYNE BRAY, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. ALEXANDRIA WOMEN'S HEALTH CLINIC ET AL.
No. 90-985
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
506 U.S. 263; 113 S. Ct. 753; 122 L. Ed. 2d 34; 1993 U.S. LEXIS 833; 61 U.S.L.W. 4080; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Service 258; 93 Daily Journal DAR 583
October 15, 1991, Argued; October 6, 1992, Reargued January 13, 1993, Decided
Looking at the scanned page from Justia.com, it seems clear it's October 16. Unless LexisNexis knows something we don't. --MZMcBride (talk) 22:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States Government articles
- Low-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class Abortion articles
- Unknown-importance Abortion articles
- WikiProject Abortion articles
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Unknown-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Unknown-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles