This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Philosophy: Philosophers / Science / Contemporary Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophers Philosophy of science Contemporary philosophy New York (state): Columbia University Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Columbia University (assessed as Low-importance).

I'd just like to note for the record that I attended a screening of WTFDWK in New York in which the filmmakers were present. They took questions at the end of the movie. Albert was in the audience, and he was very angry at the way he had been portrayed. The filmmakers were quite unapologetic -- they said it was their film and their reality. They also asked Albert how he knew that the way they had edited his comments together was improper. When Albert tried to stick up for himself, most people in the audience booed and jeered him, silencing him.

Chris Hawke

"He received his B.S. in physics from Columbia College . . . ." Columbia College only awards B.A. degrees, even in the hard sciences. If Professor Albert went to the College, than he received a B.A.. If he received a B.S., he may have gone to the Engineering school or to Columbia's School of General Studies. I'm not sure how to resolve this discrepancy, so hopefully someone else will. 209.144.201.12 (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article claims:

In his review, Albert called the book "pale, small, silly, nerdy.”

However, in this review, not the book is called "pale, small, silly, nerdy" but the "accussation that religion is [...] dumb", which Albert attributes to Krauss (and maybe other "new atheists"). Probably someone should change this in the article.

2003:58:AD09:B701:FD0C:7F32:2B96:A3DE (talk) 10:15, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the wording to "Albert called the claims made in the book "pale, small, silly, nerdy.” ". I think this more accurately reflects the book review. PloniAlmoni (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Albert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821203231/http://www.whatthebleep.com/scientists/drh-scientists.shtml to http://www.whatthebleep.com/scientists/drh-scientists.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Although Albert is listed as a scientist taking part in the sequel to What the Bleep, called "Down the Rabbit Hole", this sequel is a "director's cut", composed of extra footage from the filming of the first movie." So far so good. This is completely coherent and understandable. However, this quotes is followed by this: "The 'Down the Rabbit Hole' version features Albert as the first subject in the interview portion of the film. In that interview he expresses his disagreement with the major thrust of the original "What the Bleep Do We Know!?" Now it's implying that he came back for a second interview, rather than just having his first interview, used in the first movie, reused. I'm deleting the last part until this is clarified. 2001:56A:7E55:1200:EC0C:3A36:D106:2A65 (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article gives undue space to the brief feud with Krauss. It should probably be expanded with more information about Albert's academic contributions. Chase Kanipe (talk) 15:56, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]