This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians. Astrology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Neopaganism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Netherlands This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance). Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is important to note this. Please see link for more information. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfurlin (talk • contribs) 14:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ffranc (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say in first place she's an esoteric teacher. The singing on Cd's of friends came more by accident. (Reudwin Lans)

This seems like a vanity piece written by the subject herself. I have half a mind to nominate it for deletion, though I will give editors a chance to try to redeem it. Jinxmchue 18:55, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is how it looks for sure. Whether written by her or someone else it is clearly simply based upon her own self-published material ... most probably just her website. I will propose deletion if someone is unwilling to redeem the site.PelleSmith 23:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

80.41.1.2, you just made the edit removing two out of three 'official' sites for Freya. You said: *"There is only one official website. I have removed the imposters" These websites removed being http://www.freya-aswynn.co.uk and http://aswynn.phpwebhosting.com . I checked out the registrant of them, and they are by the registered and owner [2] by the chap (Oswald the Runemaker (Bob [ Robert] Oswald)) his forum in Milton Keynes who ownes the Armanen runes website [3] - He is the same guy that lives at a particular address in Milton Keynes [4] whom is a friend of Karl Hans Welz looking at his sites. I know because on the Armanen site he gave his full address. I don't know him or anything about him, just go this info straight from the internet as you can see. Are these "imposter" sites? Why? I ask because user 80.41.81.122 on the 23:09, November 23, 2006 removed them previously stating: *"Updated the URL of Freya's official homepage. It was moved to this new server and new domain name on November 20th 2006. update by Bob Oswald registrant of the new domain name" Bob ownes all three sites so why are two imposters? FK0071a 00:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is their an update on this? Robert C Prenic 18:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to submit this entry to WP:AFD unless it improves drastically. Anyone lurking about who has verifiable information, now is the time to source this article. - WeniWidiWiki 04:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only verifiable information I can find is one news article, about an event that isn't even mentioned in the current iteration of this article. She has a book in its fourth printing and her work seems to be well-respected by a significant group of people; I'd be in favor of keeping it if we could find some independent sources, but you can't write an article without information. - AdelaMae ^{(t - c - wpn)} 08:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any improvement or any impetus to improve it. This page conveys a minuscule amount of information about a figure who's notability isn't even explained. WP:AFD seems appropriate at tis point.PelleSmith 01:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well, was this ever AfD'd? WP:BIO does not seem to be met based on the references we currently have. --dab (𒁳) 14:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have some material concerning the history/spat with Bernard King, and the issue of the mysterious child porn that was put on Aswynn's computer? Since this as been documented by the UK media already, will there be any objections to include neutral material concerning this history? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.30.0 (talk) 13:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Freya Aswynn/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

I was googeling my name to see what's being said. and I am very surprised and please that I even appear in wikipedia.

Last edited at 19:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 15:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

I translated this article for the German Wikipedia, and I noticed that here Aswynn's birthday is given as Nov. 19th. In her own book Northern Mysteries and Magick she herself cites Nov. 9th as her birthday (p. XXV of the introduction). Does anyone know which source Nov. 19th comes from and which date is correct? de:Sonnenscheinbs (talk) 15:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Both The Encyclopedia of Modern Witchcraft and Neo-Paganism and her website only say "November 1949". I've changed to that in the article now. Apparently I'm the one who added 19, after initially leaving it out, but I can't remember why. I might have seen it in the article on Italian Wikipedia and assumed it was correct. Nice work with the German article. Ffranc (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits seem to introduce a lot of material that appears to be original research. For instance, a recent edit [5] provides an image titled "Freya Aswynns hate speech on veterans - Aug 2023", and contains a screen shot of Aswynn's words, which is a primary source. There are no secondary sources provided to indicate that an external, reliable source has characterized the subject's words in this way, or drawn any conclusions that would support the additions, or even suggested that they are notable elements to include. I suggest we stop back and forth editing until discussion can provide consensus on what is properly sourced, and what should be added or removed from the article. _signed, Willondon (talk) 18:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]