This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities Bangladesh High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list: edit history watch purge Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion) Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion) Improve Bengalis and related pages Take a look at the requested articles. Make a MRT line 3 article. Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 20 August 2022.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors Previous copyedits: /  This article was copy edited by ThisIsAce on 7 August 2007.

Terokhada is an important Upajela of Khula. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.134.8.90 (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Khulna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080625052740/http://www.bbs.gov.bd/dataindex/census/municip.pdf to http://www.bbs.gov.bd/dataindex/census/municip.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208044832/http://www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/National%20Reports/Union%20Statistics.pdf to http://www.bbs.gov.bd/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/National%20Reports/Union%20Statistics.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Discussion moved from User talk:Batternut#December 2017 Batternut (talk) 09:17, 7 December 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Hello, I'm Sunnyeceku. Regarding to your reversion to an article, Khulna, in spite of providing authentic reference, you have removed my edit from the article. The reference link was from the city corporation website, and you wanted to claim that they are not trustworthy. According to the last KCC election 2013, there were more than 800 thousands voters. How it can be possible that there is a population of 600k only? I born in Khulna, spent 26 years of my life in Khulna. Even I have provided an authentic link. You said that you trust only census, do you know that census held in every 10 years in Bangladesh? The article is about the city, in that case we can follow the data from the city corporation website. I hope you will reinstate my contribution. Thanks. you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sunnyeceku (talk) 22:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC+2)

@Sunnyeceku: Firstly the exact link you provided here always produces "Connection Failed" when I try it. I have found the "About Khulna" page [1], and it says, literally "Khulna city, an area of ---- sq km, and district, an area of ------ sq km have 1.4 million and --- million people respectively", which isn't quite the 1.5 million of your edit, and the three blanks don't really inspire much confidence in the one figure given. As the article is now it says "As of the 2011 census, the city has a population of 663,342", clearly showing that the figure is 6 years old. According to The Independent BD there were 440,566 voters at the KCC election on June 2013. It seems very unlikely that number of voters has legitimately doubled over the last four years, unless the city limits have just been expanded. Batternut (talk) 21:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Batternut: I am not very good at wikipedia editing. Probably I have placed the reference in a wrong manner. but whenever I am looking for KCC website[2], I found all of your mentioned blanks filled with number. The area is 46 km2, and population is 1.5 million right now. I don't know why you can't access the page. If you give your email id, probably I can give you screenshots, or the whole webpage in pdf format. And one more information, there are 3 new thanas have been created in Khulna City Corporation in recent years. Sunnyeceku (talk) 21:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. I don't think your editing is at fault, I think it is either the site behaving strangely perhaps for page requests from outside the country, or some strange routing problem between me (in the UK) and the site. Your similar link above produced the surrounding boilerplate for the page, but no content at all!

Anyway, I see the creation of the new thanas mentioned by the Dhaka Tribune. That news article (and similar that I have seen) is not explicit, they could be new areas within KCC, or in the metro area, rather than expansion of the KCC. Thana's are used in a policing context more than civic administration, though I see that responsibilities can overlap. Indeed as Khulna Metropolitan Police (KMP) was created to cover "Khulna Metropolitan Area" rather than just the city. Is it possible the KMP covers a wider area than the KCC? It adds to my feeling that the 1.4 or 1.5 million estimated population is within the metro area rather than the city. Batternut (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Batternut: well, I am also accessing the link from outside of Bangladesh (Finland). Whenever I am accessing via my institutional network, it shows the connection failed thing. But i can access that via my home network. I guess it is the problem of the link of not having secure connection. And as far I know, KMP covers only KCC area. Anyway, if you want to be strict on your decision, you should update the population of KCC to 751k (according to BBS website, cencus report of 2011, Khulna, Page 19)[3]. Or let me know how can I share a screenshot of that page. Sunnyeceku (talk) 14:19, 7 December 2017 (UTC+2)

Just now I have tried to access KCC website again, via my institutional network. It was successfull. I can access the site[4], about KCC menu and then click on Basic statistics sub-menu. Probably it is the problem of routing, as you said, in UK. You can try from different IP then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnyeceku (talk • contribs) 12:26, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Basic statistics sub-menu page works for me! It shows "Population: 15,00,689", but also "Area: 45.65 km2". The area figure is demonstrably wrong though - the (very useful) "District Statistics 2011" document you linked says the KCC area is 64.78km² (on page 17), and even the 2001 census said it was 59.57km² (on page 5). That makes the khulnacity.org stats look pretty dodgy. I'll put inI was going to put in the District Statistics 2011 figures 64.78km²/751k, even though the host is only an ip address, however that doc is dated June 2013, and the currently cited Union Statistics doc is dated March 2014, and they are both BBS 2011 census docs. Batternut (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Bangladesh Army Chief General SM Shafiuddin Ahmed OSP, ndu, psc, PhD.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:39, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]