| Part of a series on |
| Scholasticism |
|---|
In philosophy, the transcendentals (Latin: transcendentalia, from transcendere "to exceed") are the ultimate "properties of being" that exist beyond the material world, nowadays commonly considered to be truth, unity (oneness), beauty, and goodness.[citation needed] Formulation of transcendentals as a set arose from medieval scholasticism, namely Aquinas, though the underlying thought originated with Plato, Augustine, and Aristotle in the West.
From the time of Albertus Magnus in the High Middle Ages, the transcendentals have been the subject of metaphysics. Although there was disagreement about their number, there was consensus that, in addition to the basic concept of being itself (ens), unity (unum), truth (verum) and goodness (bonum) were part of the transcendental family.[1] Since then, thing, or reality (res), something (aliquid) and, more recently, beauty (pulchrum) have been added.[citation needed] Today, they are found in theology, particularly in Catholic thought, as unity, truth, goodness and beauty.[2]
History
Parmenides first inquired of the properties co-extensive with being.[3] Socrates, spoken through Plato, then followed (see Form of the Good).
Aristotle's substance theory (being a substance belongs to being qua being) has been interpreted as a theory of transcendentals.[4] Aristotle discusses only unity ("One") explicitly because it is the only transcendental intrinsically related to being, whereas truth and goodness relate to rational creatures.[5]
In the Middle Ages, Catholic philosophers elaborated the thought that there exist transcendentals (transcendentalia) and that they transcended each of the ten Aristotelian categories.[6] A doctrine of the transcendentality of the good was formulated by Albert the Great.[7] His pupil, Saint Thomas Aquinas, posited six transcendentals: ens, res, unum, aliquid, bonum, verum; or “being,” "thing", "one", "something", "good", and "true".[8] Saint Thomas derives the six explicitly as transcendentals,[9] though in some cases he follows the typical list of the transcendentals consisting of the One, the Good, and the True. The transcendentals are ontologically one and thus they are convertible: e.g., where there is truth, there is being and goodness also.
In Christian theology the transcendentals are treated in relation to theology proper, the doctrine of God. The transcendentals, according to Christian doctrine, can be described as the ultimate desires of man. Man ultimately strives for perfection, which takes form through the desire for perfect attainment of the transcendentals. The Catholic Church teaches that God is Truth, Goodness, and Beauty, as indicated in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.[10] Each transcends the limitations of place and time, and is rooted in being. The transcendentals are not contingent upon cultural diversity, religious doctrine, or personal ideologies, but are the objective properties of all that exists.[citation needed]
Modern “integral” or holistic philosophy within the Wilberian lineage, as well as Steve McIntosh, author of Evolution’s Purpose, seek to integrate Beauty, Truth, and Goodness as necessary requisites of all evolution in the Kosmos (body, mind, soul, spirit) within the individual at the microcosmic developmental level, as well as sociologically.
Beauty, Goodness and Truth
The three terms, Beauty, Goodness, Truth, form a subgroup within the family of transcendentals and their development can be considered separately.[11] In Plato's dialogues the individual concepts are mentioned frequently but nowhere in his works are beauty, goodness and truth put forward as a specific group. The more common formulations in the dialogues are justice, goodness and beauty, and justice, goodness and wisdom.[12] Aristotle similarly does not refer to the three concepts as a group, but in the Metaphysics he states that, "each thing relates to being and truth in the same way", and in the Ethics, that "good is said in as many ways as being". [13]
In the second century CE there was, in Alexandria, a group of early Christian Neoplatonists, who were beginning to link the ideas of Plotinus, in particular the idea of, the One, the Soul, and the Intellect, to, "the three persons of the Trinity (Lilla 1997)".[14] St. Augustine, a little later, developed an early notion of the transcendentals, namely, Being, Goodness and Truth,[15] and a connection began to be made between these and the three human faculties of Being, Willing and Knowing. [16] Pseudo-Dionysius in the sixth century compiled a list of divine names which attributed to God the concepts of the One, the Good, Light, Love, Beauty, Truth and many other terms.[17]
These notions were carried forward into the medieval period where Thomas Aquinas, took from his mentor, Albert the Great, the idea that the transcendentals were a set of three, namely, Unum, Bonum, Verum, the One, the Good and the True, referring to them as the Ens Realissimum, or the most real Being. [18] It has been suggested that Bonaventure, while agreeing that, the One, the Good and the True, could be seen as three aspects of Being,[19] proposed adding a fifth concept to the list of transcendentals, that of, Pulchrum or Beauty, but this has been disputed.[20]
In the fifteenth century, in Florence, the philosopher, Marsilio Ficino was instrumental in reviving an interest in Plato, and it is to Ficino that the first definitive formulation of Beauty, Goodness and Truth, has been attributed. The specific passage is to be found in the Commentaries (1496):
"So the action of the intelligence is directed to some end. For in so far as it understands, its end is the truth; in so far as it wills, its end is the good; in so far as it acts its end is the beautiful"[21]
The idea seems to have been taken up by the Humanist writers who followed Ficino, for example Baldassare Castiglione,[22] and we can assume that it was one of these, perhaps Gian Giorgio Trissino, the patron of the architect Palladio who was influential in the latter's referring, in his book, I Quattro Libri, (1570) to the "true, good and beautiful method of building", the first known use of the terms used consecutively.[23]
Although there are references to the threefold group in Italian thought (e.g. Muratori 1706) and German thought (König 1727) it was in France (Diderot from 1747 onwards) that the triad began to appear with any great significance.[24] In 1762 in a letter to Voltaire, Diderot referred to, " the true, the good and the beautiful [as] a kind of trinity", and Victor Cousin's book, Du vrai, du beau et du bien, Of the True, the Beautiful and the Good, appeared (in its final form) in 1853.[25]
Towards the end of the Eighteenth century, Immanuel Kant put the concepts to use in his three great works, Critique of Pure Reason (1781) Critique of Practical Reason (1781) and Critique of Judgment (1790) in which the subjects of truth, goodness and beauty were dealt with in turn.[26] Nowhere did he refer specifically to the set of three but he did say of another set taken from medieval logic, namely, "the One, the Good and the True", that although seemingly empty, may have had, "some rules of understanding... wrongly interpreted".[27]
Seventy years later, Charles Sanders Peirce, influenced by Kant, began to develop an idea of three larger categories under which the three concepts might fall. To these categories he gave the names, Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness, and used them to give an order to, among other things, "the three normative sciences: aesthetics, ethics and logic" - terms which may be compared with Beauty, Goodness and Truth. Although the order in which the terms appear has varied throughout history, Peirce's own conclusion was that, "Logic follows Ethics and both follow Aesthetics".[28]
The specific grouping together of Beauty, Goodness and Truth was not, it seems, of particular importance to Kant or Peirce and was not mentioned by them. Nietzsche, too, rejected consideration of the group saying that it was, "unworthy of a philosopher".[29] There was a shift, however, among philosophers around this time from seeing the group, not in terms of metaphysical concepts, but as three important human values. Franz Brentano was one of the first proponents of this way of thinking and his list of values (1889) included, among others, those of Beauty, Virtue and Knowledge[30]: G.E.Moore included similar values in his Principia Ethica of 1908 [31]; and A.N. Whitehead, another philosopher of the early twentieth century, referred in his book, Process and Reality (1929), to the, "vision of truth, beauty and goodness" which continues to lead us on.[32]
See also
References
- ^ Albertus Magnus named exactly these four values. See Aertsen, Jan A. (2001). "Die Frage nach dem Ersten und dem Grundlegenden. Albert der Große und die Lehre von den Transzendentalien" Albertus Magnus. Zum Gedenken nach 800 Jahren. Neue Zugänge, Aspekte und Perspektiven. ed. by Walter Senner and Henryk Anzulewicz. Berlin: Akademie1, pp. 91–112.
- ^ "Metaphysics". The Catholic Encyclopedia. Robert Appleton Company. 1912. Retrieved 25 January 2026.
- ^ DK fragment B 8
- ^ Aristotle, Metaphysics 1028b4; Allan Bäck, Aristotle's Theory of Abstraction, Springer, 2014, p. 210: "Since all that is, in any category is in virtue of having some relation to substance..., being a substance belongs to being qua being. Because of the centrality of substance for something to be, Aristotle says, "what is being is just the question what is substance." [Metaph. 1028b4] Given Aristotle’s account of focal meaning, it has turned out that x is a being only if x is a substance. Items in non-substantial categories are beings, secondarily, only given their being in substance. ... [Ι]n Metaphysics IV, Aristotle offers both transcendental and categorical items as proper subjects for first philosophy."
- ^ Aristotle, Metaphysics X.1–2; Benedict Ashley, The Way toward Wisdom: An Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Introduction to Metaphysics (University of Notre Dame Press, 2006), p. 175.
- ^ Scott MacDonald (ed.), Being and Goodness: The Concept of the Good in Metaphysics and Philosophical Theology, Cornell University Press, 1991, p. 56.
- ^ Medieval Theories of Transcendentals (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
- ^ Disputed Questions on Truth, Q. 1 A. 1.
- ^ De Veritate, Q. 1 A.1
- ^ Catechism of the Catholic Church references these three at Section 41.
- ^ Martin J.L. The Birth of the True, the Good and the Beautiful (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, Vol.35 (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2017)
- ^ Martin J.L.The True, the Good and the Beautiful: The Rise and Fall and Rise of an Architectonic for Action (Columbia University Press, New York, 2024) pp.160-161
- ^ Goris W. & Aertsen J. Medieval Theories of Transcendentals, 2013 (ed. Zalta E.N. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2019) Section 2
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.171
- ^ Goris W. & Aertsen J. 2019
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.121
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 pp.172-173
- ^ Pegis A.C. Introduction to St. Thomas Aquinas (Random House, New York, 1948) p.173; Martin J.L. 2024 p.184
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.185
- ^ Eco U.The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas, 1956, trans. Bredin H. (Radius, 1988) p.45: cf. Martin J.L. 2024 p.192
- ^ Ficino The Philebus Commentary (tr. Allen M. University of California Press, 1975) p.78: Nam quod intelligit, finis eius est veritas, quod vult finis est bonum, quod peragit finis est pulchrum, where the translator notes that the term peragit might also be translated as "disturbs".
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.217
- ^ Capon D.S. Architectural Theory, Volume One: The Vitruvian Fallacy, A History of the Categories in Architecture and Philosophy (John Wiley, Chichester, 1999) p.28
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 pp.248ff
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.536
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.375
- ^ Kant I. Critique of Pure Reason 1781, 1787 (tr. & ed. Weigelt M. Penguin Books, London, 2007) p.110
- ^ Martin J.L. 2024 p.1225, Table 3.3.7.; Peirce C.S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (eds. Hartshorne C. & Weiss P. (Harvard University Press, 1931) Vol I, p.311
- ^ Beardsley M.C. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present (University of Alabama Press, 1975) p.278; Martin J.L. pp.701-703
- ^ Zimmerman M.J. The Nature of Intrinsic Value (Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, 2001)p.189; Brentano F. The Origin of Our Knowledge of Right and Wrong 1889 (Routledge and Keegan Paul, London, 1969)
- ^ Zimmerman M.J. 2001; Moore G.E. Principia Ethica (Cambridge University Press, 1903) pp.122
- ^ Whitehead A.N. Process and Reality, 1929 (eds. Griffin D. & Sherburne D. The Free Press, New York, 1985) p.346
Bibliography
- Jan A. Aertsen, Medieval Philosophy and the Transcendentals: the Case of Thomas Aquinas, Leiden: Brill, 1996.
- Jan A. Aertsen, Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought. From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez, Leiden: Brill, 2012.
- John P. Doyle, On the Borders of Being and Knowing. Late Scholastic Theory of Supertranscendental Being, Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2012.
- Graziella Federici Vescovini (éd.), Le problème des Transcendantaux du XIVe au XVIIe siècle, Paris: Vrin, « Bibliothèque d’Histoire de la Philosophie », 2001.
- Bruno Pinchard (éd.), Fine folie ou la catastrophe humaniste, études sur les transcendantaux à la Renaissance, Paris, Champion, 1995.
- Piero di Vona, Spinoza e i trascendentali, Napoli: Morano, 1977.
External links
- Wouter, Goris; Aertsen, Jan. "Medieval Theories of Transcendentals". In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. ISSN 1095-5054. OCLC 429049174.
- Jan Aertsen on the History of Transcendentals. An Annotated Bibliography

