Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WPA Theatre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 98.248.161.240! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is reason2=corp ?

98.248.161.240 (talk) 10:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pectoral ornament, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:07, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Article wizard/Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Whitaker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 01:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Frost. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to Komodo Edit because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Frost 17:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Komodo Edit downloads are still available, this is where they are

98.248.161.240 (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Stanley Long, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Simeon Mortensen (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

what is ""vandalize Wikipedia again"" about that edit?

14:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC) 98.248.161.240 (talk) 14:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User Simeon Mortensen was vandalizing user pages and has been blocked. You can delete their edits to your talk page if you wish. Celjski Grad (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Spectrallights. This comment is in regards to edits I made at Rita, Sue and Bob Too after copy editing. I removed the section you added about Marketing because it was a literal description of the images on the poster. There appears to be nothing significant or specific about the marketing that warrants its own section; i.e., the mullets on the poster don't appear to have been responsible for the film's success. WP:PARAGRAPH has more information on how to structure sections and paragraphs. If you think I made a mistake or have a question, you can message me on my talk page. Spectrallights (talk) 07:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have made a topic on the "The Last Dinner Party" talk page about information you added to it on 3 July 2024. I would appreciate it if you could clarify the questions I outline in it, it is linked below

Talk:The Last Dinner Party#Potential incorrect information

Thanks. Ewan-65 (talk) 18:45, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Komodo Edit. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Wburrow (talk) 20:55, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

answer on the Talk: Komodo Edit page

98.248.161.240 (talk) 15:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 98.248.161.240, your posting of npov|date=August 2024 in the article Soap Box Derby is welcome but certainly requires some further explanation, if you please. Where in the article do you feel it needs editing to rectify this? I appreciate the help. turnpike (talk) 18:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The tone is extremely promotional with a lot of superlatives. It diverges from the structure and voice many other vehicle race organization articles. It is written to evoke an emotional reaction instead of merely conveying information. Is it self-promotional? 98.248.161.240 (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mark Penn have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —Bruce1ee^talk 12:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see Talk:Mark Penn

98.248.161.240 (talk) 12:36, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply at Talk:Mark Penn. —Bruce1ee^talk 12:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seen 98.248.161.240 (talk) 19:04, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WPA Theatre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 14:56, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]