This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original talk page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Averroist.

To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Hello, Averroist. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Thanks for your contribution to the Punjab Police (Pakistan). The article needs a lot of work but you seem to be getting it there. I hope togive you a hand in the next few days. --Allie Cabab (talk) 23:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the complements, I like your new heading "Famous Officers", it is more suitable than mine headins, but i think that one line has been repeated for 2 time "There have been many brave police officers in the history of the Punjab Police. The most famous of them were Qazi Safdar Hussain Senior Superintendent of Police, Raja Imtiaz Ahmed Superintendent of Police, and Muhammad Aslam Jora inspector Police." It is better that you delete it yourself, but keep the picture in right side, I think it will be better. Thanks. Averroist (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Averroist, I like the picture of Sir Syed, Mohsin-ul-Mulk, and Syed Mahmood that you have contributed. Would you be interested in adding it to the article on Syed Mahmood, just as you have done for the other two? Thanks! Aguenther (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

	Dear Sir, I have added the picture of Justice Syed Mahmood with pleasure. Thanks for your likeness of pictures of Sir Syed Ahmed Khan and Nawab Mohsin ul Mulk, only a man of letters or real scholar can like these pictures. Thanks. Averroist (talk) 22:16, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Averroist! Please could you provide me with the date of publication of Wadi Soon Sakesar: The Soon Valley, the details of the publishers of the book, and specific page number references relating to Qazi Mazhar Qayyum and Khan Sahib Zafar Hussain; Wikipedia editors are very particular about these details being provided in full.

Thanks

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 05:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your asking and regular contribution for this article. The information about the book is as follows: Al- Faisal Nashran, Lahore

A joint venture of Lok Virsa, Islamabad and AL-Faisal Nashran, Lahore copy right Lok Virsa, Islamabad 2002. I have already added this information in the article. I am now in France, and the book is available in Pakistan. With reference to specific page number of pages, I'll provide you in few months after visiting Pakistan.

Thanks. Averroist (talk) 13:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Averroist! I look forward to hearing from you as regards the pertinent page numbers, vis-a-vis Wadi Soon Sakesar: The Soon Valley.

Best wishes

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hassan bin Ubaid Ullah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 21:13, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Averroist! I hope you're well. I just wanted to thank you for awarding me with the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. I really appreciate it.

Best wishes

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 00:26, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Averroist! I hope all is well at your end. I just wanted to thank you for getting in touch with Black Kite, and trying your best to make him aware of the situation, vis-a-vis the 'Awan (Pakistan)' article. It's my understanding that the limits placed on editing the article, will be lifted by the 22nd of this month. I really don't think that Alamsherkhan is going to desist from vandalising the article, so all I can do is make an effort to protect the article to the best of my ability, but I would really appreciate it if you could also assist me in doing so (even if it something as simple as reverting the article to back to my edits, should Alamsherkhan continue to alter fully referenced content that he has no justification to remove). Furthermore, it may well be necessary for both of us to present a united front against Alamsherkhan, should another dispute arise with the senior editors.

I am hoping to get hold of another book soon, the author of which is satisfied by the Awan claim to Arab origins - I will add his opinions to the article, thus expanding the range of views contained within it.

Best regards

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	I have always been a firm believer in giving credit where credit is due. I have watched your work and extensive edits on Wikipedia with wonder and amazement. Keep up the good work! I will help you to save the prestige of our noble tribe and the standard of Wikipedia. Regards. Averroist (talk) 07:50, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, brother. I appreciate your kind words, the contributions you have made to the article - thus improving it - and the level of support you’ve offered.

Best wishes

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 01:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Averroist . I think that Rawalpindi express is not going to respect others opinion and he will make sure to arrange the page in the form that there is no room left for other claims . As he already got warning for deletion so he have requested you to assist him “reverting the article back to his edits”. that is why most the editors wanted to join for consensus on the issue I don’t have objection on the number of references. But I am against his repetitions. For me Kalgan more resembles with Kalkan or kalakhan instead of Kalan Shah. Gowrarra , resembles with Arorra. gow-rrara do means cow herder in Pashtu while he insist to place him as Gohar Shah in th article. For him Khokhar Awan and Chohan Awan got the names of mother tribes but I am of opinion Mr.Khokhar and Mr. Chohan married Qutab shah Daughters and the got attached with Awan tribe as Qutab Shah’s adopted Sons. What is wrong if he married his daughters to local muslims? When we all accept that he married his Sons to local girls .then it is also possible that he married his daughters to local Muslims. First of all i don't support derive theory. Persian/ Pashtu and Arabic are too old languages and are not in lack of proper words from expressions. More over in case of Arabic, "Insar" and "Nasir" are very common to express helper instead to derive it from Aon. Any how If the Title of Awan is derived from ( Ahwan (Sanskrit), Haiwan (Persian, Urdu), and Own (English), then this must be supported by dictionary page numbers. In the past he tried to keep his hold on the article and I guess in the future he will try the same. I need your support to save the rights of all the editors no matter they are seasoned one or new comers. Regards Alamsherkhan (talk) 14:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alamsherkhan, there is little use in appealing to Averroist (amongst others), since he also not only realises the extent to which you have vandalised the article, he has also informed Black Kite about this (and as you know, it was Black Kite who took the step of protecting the article); to quote him:

“Thanks for protectecting the article from editing, but I want to bring into your notice one thing. The article according to the last edit made by Rawalpindi Express contains 41 references, but Alam Sher Khan deleted first five references in his last edit, and you have protected the article with only 36 references. It is the policy of Wikipedia that, ‘Good articles start with a brief lead section introducing the topic.’ Please compare this brief lead section of both versions. You must also see the history of contributions of both users. Rawalpindi Express is giving justification in edit summary of every edit, while Alamsherkhan is deleting, removing referenced material,referenced citations and referenced quotes from this article without any edit summary, and thus he is engaging in non-constructive vandalism. And you have protected the article on his last edit. Rawalpindi Express has long contributing history with positive edits against vandalism, but Alamsherkhan is a new user with a history of engaging in non-constructive vandalism. It is therefore requested that the the article should be restored to the last edit made by Rawalpindi Express, so that till the disputes have been resolved, the standard, principles and guidelines of Wikipedia must be maintained. Regards Averroist (talk) 17:05, 8 August 2011 (UTC)”

It is also Averroist who awarded me with the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar, for my “endless work for protecting Wikipedia article on Awan.”

Moving on, if you are going to make allegations about me, then at least ensure that there is a kernel of truth to what you say. To say that I don’t respect the opinions of others, is complete and utter nonsense. If this was the case, then why didn’t I remove the citation recently added by Intothefire (whom you’ve also appealed to), which mentions the views of Professor Hasan Dhani? As I have emphasised before, despite me being an Awan, I have no cast-iron opinions regarding the origin of the Awan tribe, and that is why I have incorporated the viewpoints of authors who consider the traditional claim made by the bulk of the tribe to Arab origins to be reasonable, as well as the opinions of commentators who reject this contention. Moreover, Intothefire’s inclusion is valid, because his addition was fully referenced – this is a basic point that you still fail to grasp. In fact, apart from Averroist highlighting that you continue to ignore this crucial point, even Intothefire has pointed this out to you (and I quote him directly from a message he left on your user page), “Since this is an encyclopedia , its best that that all information provided is backed up by valid and reliable secondary sources .” Above all, when I myself contacted you, I categorically stated, “...if you are in possession of source material you’d like to add to the article, providing that it is relevant to the subject matter, and fully referenced, then please do contribute to the article, thereby making it more comprehensive.” (And I welcome said additions from anyone else.)

As Intothefire has underlined (and as did I when I got in touch with you), this is an encyclopedia, not a forum for your personal opinions. You assert that I have attempted to keep a "hold" on this article – this is patently untrue. You have only started making contributions to Wikipedia; had you been doing at an earlier point, you would have been aware of the fact that the article in question had not only become a complete mess (which you have taken it back to, due to grammatical errors on your part, and alterations you have made to the structure of the article that have disrupted its flow, as well as rendering it unreadable at times), it was also full of personal points of view, such as those you are attempting to add to the article. As such, a number of senior editors, tagged the entire article and decided that additions to the article that were unreferenced, would have to be removed. Due to this, I spent a number of months accumulating a wide range of source material – whatever was contained within the article that I was able to substantiate, I retained, and whatever I was unable to substantiate (with the aid of valid source material), was removed (as per the request of the senior editors). In fact, to this day, I continue to endeavour that all additions made to the article are fully referenced, I continue to make additions to the article in an effort to improve it (such as the addition of the photo gallery, and the views of contemporary scholars), and when necessary, I continue to refine and clean up the article – so this isn’t a question of me trying to keep a “hold” on the article as you claim, it’s a question of me putting months of hard work into ensuring this is an article of the highest quality possible, that also conforms to certain standards set by Wikipedia (and it is not only Averroist who acknowledges this. Recently, Intothefire also said of my contributions, “Thankyou for the great effort and attention you put into the article . Your contributions are commendable.”), only to have you arbitrarily remove valid and fully referenced additions that do not conform to your personal point of view, and add viewpoints that are unsubstantiated.

Contrary to what you claim, whatever my own personal opinions may be, I have not added them to the article (respecting the fact that doing so is unacceptable as this is an encyclopaedia, and not my own personal thesis) – just recently, Intothefire raised concerns about additions to the article that he considered to constitute personal viewpoints, and having reached a consensus with him (as he made perfectly reasonable points), these additions were removed (thus once again negating your claims about me not being prepared to accept the opinions of others). I should also stress that not all of the material included within the article was added by me either (once again underlining just how false your claims about me are), and all such material has been retained on the basis that it can be substantiated by reliable references. As for you claiming that you object to the “repetitions” I have made within the article, once again, not only are your expressing a personal point of view (which, given the nature of your edits, I don’t wholly accept, but look upon as being a judgement coloured by your biases), it’s a claim that is invalid because the quotes and citations you have removed (valid and fully referenced, and thus your actions are unjustified), lend weight to the additions made to the article as they substantiate and reinforce these pertinent additions. You state, “For me Kalgan more resembles with Kalkan or kalakhan instead of Kalan Shah. Gowrarra , resembles with Arorra. gow-rrara do means cow herder in Pashtu while he insist to place him as Gohar Shah in th article. For him Khokhar Awan and Chohan Awan got the names of mother tribes but I am of opinion Mr.Khokhar and Mr. Chohan married Qutab shah Daughters and the got attached with Awan tribe as Qutab Shah’s adopted Sons.” Firstly, is it arrogance that blinds you to just how ironic the claims you make about me are, in the light of such a statement? In case it needs to be pointed out to you yet again, these are your own personal opinions, and thus, unless you can back them up with referenced source material, it is not reasonable to expect them to be included within the article. Secondly, I am not insistent on naming the individuals in the fashion you so object to, due to my personal viewpoints, but because those are direct quotes and citations, and therefore those who authored the works that reference has been made to, refer to these individuals as such – therefore, if you are not already aware of this, please let me draw your attention to the fact that you cannot alter a direct quote or citation. As for what you have to say about Rose needing to cite page numbers from a dictionary in order to support his views, that’s just ridiculous; the work authored by Rose, is widely-respected and widely-acknowledged, and has been cited by other experts in this field (and as it is, you not have cited a single page number from any valid or recognised source – does this not smack of hypocrisy on your part?). And in case it escaped your attention, I actually did cite a dictionary reference relating to the etymology of ‘Awan’ (complete with a page number).

Lastly, at least have the decency not to spread blatant lies about me; you told Averroist that I “got warning for deletion” – that you can be so disingenuous, beggars belief; I never received any such warning, the reality is, Palltrast warned me about engaging in an edit war with you – it’s the same warning you also received from him, and in the interests of jogging your memory, let me reproduce said warning that was left on your user page, as well as mine:

“You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Awan (Pakistan) . Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: 1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. 2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Palltrast (talk) 06:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)”

Your hypocrisy and attempts to twist the truth, are breathtaking, Alamsherkhan.

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 16:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What year did you take this photo? He looks to be in his 20s, so you must have taken in the 1960s. Is that correct, otherwise who is the real photographer, when was it taken and under what licence has it been released? ww2censor (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The picture has been scanned from the national ID card of the Cricketer, who on my request himself gave me for scan. he also gave me permission to publish it. The old scanned picture has been retouched with Adobe Photo Shop by me. Please tell me if any modification is necessary in description or authorship, I'll change it accordingly. The licence is (PD-Pakistan), as the Cricketer is Pakistani. Regards Averroist (talk) 15:44, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Averroist! I hope you’re well, brother. I'm getting in touch with you, because unfortunately, I need your help in containing one particular individual who is now persistently vandalising the article above (formerly titled ‘Awan [Pakistan]’), in the same fashion that led to some intense debate, not too long ago (i.e. the issue of the Awan tribe claiming to be of Arabian origin). He/she last altered the article (using the IP address, 182.177.190.75) by once again removing fully referenced material (without justification), as well as by making corrupt alterations to additions that have been cited though the use of reliable source material. I would appreciate any assistance you could provide in preventing this individual from continuing to ruin the article. I am actually thinking of semi-protecting the article. Rawalpindi Express (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	I appreciate your work and extensive edits on this article. I'll be with you Averroist (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I appreciate it! Rawalpindi Express (talk) 23:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Awan (tribe), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pathan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Averroist, I hope you're well.

I am just getting in touch to let you know that I removed reference to the work by the author above (along with any relevant citations), as the work he authored has previously raised concerns, due it being a reproduction of Wikipedia articles, and thus considered to be unreliable. I commend you for the efforts you are making to expand the content of the article though.

Regards

Rawalpindi Express (talk) 03:01, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Thanks for your careful eye, information, edits and comments. Take care, Averroist (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Pakistani Barnstar of National Merit
		For your image contribution and the recent creation of Pakistan National Movement. lTopGunl (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: The Pakistani Barnstar of National Merit

Hi TopGun! Thank you for awarding me the Barnstar. I really appreciate the fact that you acknowledge my efforts. Best wishes Averroist (talk) 15:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, keep up the good work. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted your changes to this article as the references were not formatted correctly. Please use the cite book template in the editbar menu to add citations. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:00, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is easy to criticize, it is harder to improve the article. I would welcome you to imrove yourself this article. Regards Averroist (talk) 10:31, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the barnstar! It is much appreciated :) Regards, Mar4d (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

...and another thanks. Cheers! --lTopGunl (talk) 16:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

″A distracting, confusing, or otherwise unsuitable signature may adversely affect other users″. Your signature seems to at least have the following issues:

1. It's too big and causes visual distraction.
2. Doesn't contain a link to your talk.

Would you mind altering it a little bit to address the issues (e.g. making it a bit smaller)? See WP:SIGN for info. Mr T^{(Talk?) (New thread?)} 13:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
	Wiki Loves Monuments comes to Pakistan! Hi Averroist! WLM is the largest international photographic competition in the world and we are looking forward to expanding it to Pakistan this year. We have been planning to make this national competition really take off; but to do so, we need your help! Sign up at Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Pakistan and our mailing list if you are interested in being part of the organising team or can help spread the word. We look forward to hearing from you! Official website of WLM Pakistan

You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:25, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan
	Hi Averroist! We are currently in the process of establishing a User Group for Pakistani Wikimedians with the following objectives; act as a hub for Pakistani editors working across the Wikimedia projects, act as a voice and representative for the Pakistani Wikimedian community, organize meet-ups, establish a Wikimedia Pakistan Chapter, acquire funding for various on-wiki and off-wiki activities including photo competitions, workshops and other public outreach events, and collaborate with the wider Wikimedia community. As an approved User Group, we will be recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation and officially supported by the Wikimedia movement. If you reside in Pakistan or actively work on Pakistan-related topics and can help in functional activities of the Pakistani User Group, please join the official planning group mailing list. For more details about the proposed user group, please visit the official page at http://pk.wikimedia.org. Together we can promote free knowledge in Pakistan!

You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:15, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pervaizsajjad.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chrahmat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MirKhalil.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:13, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KhanSahibMedal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ColAltaf2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ColAltaf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Miqbal3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:23, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Miqbal2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Miqbal1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chaudhryrehmat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rehmat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toluislam2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alli Abbas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ZAFAR4.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Majinnah8.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pakistan Declaration.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Averroist!

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan[reply]

Hi Averroist!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Siryedazam1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waqarulmulk2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Muammadalijinnah1.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Averroist. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Sirmuhammadshafi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MAPOFRAHMATPLAN.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]