Epstein Files Full PDF

Wikipedia ads	file info – #196

Wikipedia ads	file info – #290

Wikipedia ads	file info – #35

This user is aware of the designation of the following as contentious topics: living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles the Balkans or Eastern Europe the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people COVID-19, broadly construed the Arab–Israeli conflict post-1978 Iranian politics He should not be given alerts for those areas.

EasternShah is busy and is going to be on Wikipedia in off-and-on doses, and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 30 days are automatically archived 5 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 2.

I am open to collaborators, I will be attempting to get these articles to featured list status (though some do not meet the length requirement) and the topic as a whole to featured topic. You are encouraged to work on these articles yourself and nominate them. I will review those and you can leave me a talk page message to solicit a review.

edit | discuss

List of World Heritage Sites in Arab States

20 articles

Algeria (mostly ready)

Bahrain (ready, ask Tone to nom)

Egypt

Iraq (not ready)

Jordan (nom'd)

Kuwait (not ready)

Lebanon (not ready)

Libya (nom'd)

Mauritania (not ready)

Morocco

Oman

Palestine

Qatar (minor work)

Saudi Arabia (ai-gen'd, needs rephrasing, expansion)

Sudan

Syria (not ready)

Tunisia

United Arab Emirates (needs work)

Yemen

Glad to have you back and editing again. Zalaraz (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. User:Easternsahara 00:26, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back Starlet (What Now?) (My changes) 21:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

woot! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

+1, nice to see you back! 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 16:14, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded, I look forward to seeing your work continue. -- Reconrabbit 11:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I am topic banned from the PIC. Can I edit Nadeen Ayoub (her career, accomplishments, early life) as long as I steer clear of content that is directly related to the PIC? I will not edit parts of the article that are about her getting harased by pro-Israel people, feud with an Israeli beauty queen, and analysis about the Gaza war. Also, can i edit the following articles:

1. List of ambassadors of Palestine to China
2. List of ambassadors of China to Palestine
3. List of Palestine international footballers born outside Palestine
4. Palestine Book Award?

thanks Sahib-e-Qiran 23:50, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, but a topic ban means you cannot edit articles in that area, broadly construed. This applies to entire articles. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 01:47, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TBAN: weather-related parts of other pages, even if the pages as a whole have little or nothing to do with weather: the section entitled "Climate" in the article California, for example, is covered by the topic ban, but the rest of the article is not; This is why I am asking for an admin. I fixed my signature. No reply needed Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 01:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As noted, this is not correct, someone can edit an article where only a portion is about the prohibited topic; I use Ms. Rachel as an example, a children's entertainer/educator who made comments about the Gaza War; banned/non-EC users could edit about her work but not her Gaza comments or her displaying art related to Gaza. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot thanks for clearing that up. It appears that I was wrong in this case. thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 22:05, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechie, for the reasons I mentioned here, which are based on written policy, I'm not sure you are wrong, though I do agree that the position on this talk page is that topic bans are interpreted narrowly instead of broadly. Coining (talk) 22:50, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please fix your signature. As a general rule of thumb, it should be obvious what your username is from the display of your signature, and "Sahib-e-Qiran" doesn't particularly tell me that your username is "EasternShah". thetechie@enwiki:~$ she/they | talk 01:48, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• Recognition of Palestine(and Israel, really) is a integral part of the conflict as recognizing Palestine confers the ability to exchange ambassadors; even now that more countries recognize them than not, I would steer clear of it to avoid any potential issue.

Yes, you should be fine to edit about Ayoub as you describe. 331dot (talk) 10:08, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can i also edit the football and book award ones? Thanks for your response Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 15:04, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: sorry for the second ping but I don't think you commented on List of Palestine international footballers born outside Palestine and Palestine Book Award, is it acceptable for me to edit these as well? I understand that I should not edit the ambassador lists. Sahib-e-Qiran, He Who is Otherwise Known as ‪EasternShah‬ 21:25, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Those should be okay. 331dot (talk) 21:55, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Whats up with the name change lol? I was wondering who this was. Welcome back haha ← Metallurgist (talk) 02:42, 18 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. The article about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre has previously had extensive discussions to arrive at the existing name. If you think the name should be changed please review those discussions before proposing a page move. Please do not boldly move a controversial article to different name as such a move is, by definition, going to be a potentially controversial move. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 01:17, 21 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

okay, ill create a formal move request. i think that the move request that got it moved to its current title just stated that it was the common name, but did not analyse the quality of the sources that called it a massacre. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 00:36, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I am T-banned from the A-I, and Talk:Organisation of Islamic Cooperation has a notice about the entire article being related to the A-I. However, I do not think that it is completely related to the A-I. Can I edit the article as long as I don't edit about the A-I, and can the banner have the |section=yes parameter added if so. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 06:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

My advice would be to make an edit request so that you avoid debating as to if you can technically make the edit or not. 331dot (talk) 09:11, 25 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

are 2026 Israeli–United States strikes on Iran and related articles a part of WP:A-I? Iran is not an arab country and its not certain why exactly the strikes occurred. Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 22:02, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

BTW i think I made some edits on ali kameini and stuff, and participated in some discussion. I will revert and strike out that if it is determined that those edits were breaches of my tban Sahib-e-Qiran, EasternShah 23:41, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) The article is currently protected as an AE action, with one of the CTOPs it relates to being the Arab–Israeli conflict. So, I would say yes. Also, 2026 Minab school airstrike and its AFD are protected as being under the topic area. I have struck the comment and !vote you made at the AFD. Chess enjoyer (talk) 00:25, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• The restrictions apply because Iran has supplied groups opposed to Israel(Hamas and Hezbollah). 331dot (talk) 11:55, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:General disclaimer on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 22:31, 28 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am notifying you that I have reported you for directed abuse towards users. Edward Tivrusky IV (talk) 23:14, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy link: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard § Abusive User. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:20, 1 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
118		Uru people (talk)	Add sources
152		Geographical indication (talk)	Add sources
116		Early Islamic philosophy (talk)	Add sources
3,836		Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani (talk)	Add sources
114		Pseudocereal (talk)	Add sources
140		Geographical indications and traditional specialities in the European Union (talk)	Add sources
71		Christianity and other religions (talk)	Cleanup
60		Tawassul (talk)	Cleanup
5,936		History of Iran (talk)	Cleanup
67,367		Supreme Leader of Iran (talk)	Expand
6,890		NATO (talk)	Expand
198		Food loss and waste (talk)	Expand
568		Jalebi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
839		Abortion law in the United States by state (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
119		Islamic fundamentalism in Iran (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4,317		Democrats 66 (talk)	Merge
103		Proof of the Truthful (talk)	Merge
124,332		2026 Iranian Supreme Leader election (talk)	Merge
229		Spread of Christianity (talk)	Wikify
189		Nafl prayer (talk)	Wikify
389		Islamic honorifics (talk)	Wikify
172		Ramadan in Iran (talk)	Orphan
5		Kumbakonam Betel Leaf (talk)	Orphan
4		Ashraf Muhammad Yusuf Uthman Abd al-Salam (talk)	Orphan
20		Nick Roberts (politician) (talk)	Stub
21		Popular Front (Philippines) (talk)	Stub
17,158		Javad Khamenei (talk)	Stub
66		Abdul-Nabi Mousavi Fard (talk)	Stub
158		Mohammad Ali Ale-Hashem (talk)	Stub
9		History of Islamic Philosophy (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]