Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

It is approximately 8:34 AM where this user lives (South Korea). [refresh]

Please can I see the deleted article List of missing people from Nepal. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:47, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 13:53, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). Davidgoodheart (talk) 05:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Domonique Ramirez and Gordon Campbell (journalist). ✗plicit 14:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Bennett Taylor, Daisy Taylor, and Peter Taylor (composer). Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Daisy Taylor and Peter Taylor (composer). Bennett Taylor was just a redirect to Prey (2022 film)#Cast. ✗plicit 12:17, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I see the deleted article Gold (2015 film). Davidgoodheart (talk) 03:25, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 11:57, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I see the deleted articles Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Women's Extreme Wrestling and ACW American Joshi Championship. ✗plicit 01:31, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I see the deleted articles Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, and Gottlieb Fluhmann. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:24, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Cindy Rogers, Anarchy Championship Wrestling, Gottlieb Fluhmann. ✗plicit 12:07, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Warworld (Transformers) and Sky Lynx. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Warworld (Transformers) and Sky Lynx. ✗plicit 10:56, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Kimberly Anthony and Bludgeon (Transformers). Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:49, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Kimberly Anthony and Bludgeon (Transformers). ✗plicit 00:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Primus (Transformers), Transformers: Robots in Disguise (toy line), and Transformers: Universe. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:48, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Primus (Transformers), Transformers: Robots in Disguise (toy line), and Transformers: Universe. ✗plicit 01:16, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted article Clicktag. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:08, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 01:27, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the re-derected Wreck-Gar article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:34, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: This one was actually a bad deletion, so I have restored the page history. ✗plicit 00:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the re-directed articles Omega Supreme and Shockwave (Transformers). Davidgoodheart (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Shockwave (Transformers). Omega Supreme has no deleted revisions, so they are all accessible in the history tab. ✗plicit 00:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please can I see the deleted article Windcharger. Davidgoodheart (talk) 01:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 02:06, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the re-directed article Sludge (Transformers). Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:34, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Here it is. ✗plicit 00:55, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted and redirected articles the List of Transformers supporting characters, Ruckus, and Dinobots. Davidgoodheart (talk) 22:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: List of Transformers supporting characters and Ruckus (Transformers). The deleted page history of Dinobots was merged into Draft:Dinobots. ✗plicit 01:10, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted and re-directed articles Thunderwing, Vector Sigma, Pretenders (Transformers), and Matrix of Leadership. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:24, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Thunderwing, Vector Sigma, Pretenders (Transformers), and Matrix of Leadership. ✗plicit 00:37, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Rocky Johnson (mixed martial artist) and List of recurring Mario franchise enemies. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:20, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Rocky Johnson (mixed martial artist) and List of recurring Mario franchise enemies. ✗plicit 00:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Natalia Starr, Aerialbots, and Fangry. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Natarlia Starr. There are no deleted revisions for Aerialbots and the history of Fangry was userfied at User:Mathewignash/Fangry. ✗plicit 23:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please the re-directed articles Firecons and Shy Guy (Mario). Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Firecons. The entire page history of Shy Guy (Mario) was restored in 2021. ✗plicit 11:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please see the deleted articles Cindersaur, Flamefeather and Sparkstalker. Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Cindersaur. The other two were just created as redirects. ✗plicit 06:18, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can I please se the re-directed articles Alpha Trion, Combaticons, and Stunticons. Davidgoodheart (talk) 21:40, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidgoodheart: Alpha Trion and Combaticons contain no deleted history. Stunticons's deleted history is only a redirect created as a result of a page move. ✗plicit 23:34, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, before I try uploading another Jenny Wright photo, can I get your opinion? You had deleted File:Jenny Wright Lawnmower Man publicity photo.jpg, but what do you think of the possibility of this headshot being fair use? Thanks. Kolya Butternut (talk) 03:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Hi Kolya Butternut Since Jenny Wright is alive, pretty much no non-free image of her is going to be considered OK to use per Wikipedia's non-free content use policy (more specificaly WP:FREER and item 1 of WP:NFC#UUI. It's important to understand the Wikipedia policy is more restrictive than fair use by design, and one of the ways it is has to do with not really allowing non-free images of living people to be uploaded and used, except in some limited cases. For most articles about living people, only freely licensed or public domain images as explained in c:Commons:Licensing are going to be OK to upload and use, and I don't really see any way for the eBay image you linked to be treated any way other than as non-free without knowing more about the photo's provenance. If, for example, it was first published in the US before March 1, 1989, there's a possibility that it could be within the public domain under US copyright law if copyright formalities weren't properly taken care of, but anything first published on or after March 1, 1989, would still be under copyright protection for many years to come regardless of copyright formalities. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. This might apply under WP:NFC#UUI: retired individuals whose notability rests in large part on their earlier visual appearance, a new picture may not serve the same purpose as an image taken during their career, in which case the use would be acceptable. It was more than likely before 1989, but I do not know. Kolya Butternut (talk) 10:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you'll get too far trying to argue such a thing since Wright is mainly notable for being an actress, not for her physical appearance. You can if you want but I doubt it'll work because the same argument could pretty much be made for any living actor, athlete, musician, model, politician, TV personality, etc. who has a Wikipedia article about written about them. If, however, you can find sourced critical commentary in reliable sources (not just mentions but actual critical commentary) about Wright's physical appearance in that particular photo or at that particular time in her life, then maybe others might agree with you; for example, if she underwent plastic surgery or suffered some sort of disfigurement, an image might work in connection with reliably sourced content about such things in a section of the article, but trying to justify using it in the infobox by saying this is how she looked back in the 1980s probably won't be too convincing an argument. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, in this diff, I tried my hand at closing, but then stupidly forgot that I had in fact participated in the discussion, so undid that edit as well as other related ones. However, now the discussion doesn't show up on the main TfD page, so I'm afraid that it might be forgotten. Could you help me close it? You're more than welcome to use my exact rationale. Thanks a bunch, it's lio! | talk | work 16:38, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HKLionel:  Done. ✗plicit 11:21, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit, can you please restore Ashish Vijay? The ongoing XfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Vijay will obviously result in a delete, but I believe the author is trying to evade G4 in the future by getting it G7'ed now. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeraxmoira:  Done. ✗plicit 12:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at File:GA COHEN 1986.jpg? It's a screenshot from a YouTube video, but the source link provided seems to be a case of WP:COPYLINK. I'm not sure whether that means the screenshot itself is a copyright violation per WP:F9 or that only the link needs to be removed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:41, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi, since F9 doesn't apply to non-free files, one should just remove the link. ✗plicit 03:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying that's pretty much what they should do in their question at MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:57, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

According to Creating Template:Taxonomy/Onychorhynchidae, in April 2022 you deleted {{Taxonomy/Onychorhynchidae}} because it was no longer needed. Now it is needed, as the International Ornithological Congress has resurrected the family for seven species. (See wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds#IOC 15.1.) Can you recreate it, please? Thank you. Craigthebirder (talk) 01:32, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Craigthebirder:  Done, template restored. ✗plicit 03:50, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Craigthebirder (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Explicit. Would you mind taking a look at User talk:Wikiaddict8962#Disputed non-free use rationale for File:TClaudeNelson-Williams.jpeg? I thought progress was being made based on what was being discussed at FFD regarding other files uploaded by this user, but the file in question is a reupload of File:ClaudeNelson-Williams JP-E-Cole.jpeg that you deleted yesterday per F11. The reupload is licensed as non-free, but that creates a different set of issues to resolve. I can understand this user being frustrated, but the part of their post implying they will keep re-uploading deleted images until they're successfully added to the article seems to be a move into WP:IDHT territory. There other edits seem to be reasonable, but their user talk page has quite a number of image related notifications dating as far back as 2007; so, this doesn't seem to be the case of a new user being unfamiliar with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines regarding images. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:59, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spworld2 has asked for a deletion review of 2025 Thiruvananthapuram mass murder. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Cryptic 14:39, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As the European Union is a sui generis federative superstate, it makes sense to have a separate list of buildings within this superstate. Chick Pea Corea (talk) 22:26, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]