Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Paul Mescal have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Paul Mescal was changed by Fitzwilliams (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956812 on 2021-03-12T18:44:33+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Jamie Dornan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 13:55, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "he sang in his band and later in several films" does not make Dornan notable as a singer. The lead should contain only the professions and/or accomplishments for which he is notable. Singing isn't one of them. General Ization ^Talk 13:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fitzwilliams! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Paul Mescal. Wikipedia is not a collection of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links may include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fitzwilliams and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Paul Mescal, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! KyleJoan^talk 03:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you KyleJoan. I will take care of your suggestions further. Fitzwilliams (talk) 05:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	Yummy Golden Dumplings!!! Yum!!!
	Yummy!!! Slurply slurrrrply ahwhahwahwaha gobble gobble sluurrrrrrrrrrp YUMMY PeaceLoverStephenTrue1111 (talk) 23:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a texting social media, I guess. Fitzwilliams (talk) 05:28, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI, the user above has been blocked for disruptive editing and sockpuppetry, so they're not going to see your responses. You can ignore it. Canterbury Tail talk 14:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Fitzwilliams (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will ignore such things from now on. Fitzwilliams (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jamie Dornan have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jamie Dornan was changed by Fitzwilliams (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867722 on 2021-04-02T10:51:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:51, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I removed the reference again, they are hosting lyrics without permission from the copyright holders even their copyright notice indicates as such. I'm sure you can find a source that links him to that song that doesn't involve a lyric site. Generally speaking for lyrics we only accept an artist's own site, their record label or Metro Lyrics who pay the artists for the permissions and access. See WP:COPYLINK. I'm not trying to pick on you, just keep our strict copyright rules. All you're looking for is a reliable source that says he sung/wrote that song, that must exists somewhere even in a magazine I'm sure. Canterbury Tail talk 11:57, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try my best to look for the facts further. Thank you for your concern. Fitzwilliams (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ballymoney Drama Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ballymoney Drama Festival, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you don't mind, but I took the liberty of performing some copyediting on the Draft:Ballymoney Drama Festival article you put together. Just to tidy it up, fix a few sentences here and there and tweak a few minor items. Canterbury Tail talk 02:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your contribution. I hope you will be able to contribute more. And pray it becomes a wikipage soon. Because it is taking a lot of time. Fitzwilliams (talk) 09:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Jamie Dornan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bjelleklang - talk 20:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for this. I cannot express my heartiest gratification for your kind review. Fitzwilliams (talk) 03:38, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple secondary sources- publicity pieces and self published peices do not contribute to notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ballymoney Drama Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ballymoney Drama Festival, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kevin Maher (writer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All look good except the reliability; replace iMDB sources with more reliable citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Jamie Dornan performances and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Jamie Dornan performances, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 14:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Ballymoney Drama Festival, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fitzwilliams,

It's best to create and develop pages in Draft space or User space like your Sandbox. Templates have a specific use on Wikipedia and aren't a good location for experimentation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fitzwilliams. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ballymoney Drama Festival, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of Jamie Dornan performances, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Slywriter (talk) 02:57, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for this

I am willing to explain the theory as it were in the above title. Justanother2 (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the article has been created. Why would there be any debate about that? Plus there are hundreds such articles on Wikipedia. Fitzwilliams (talk) 02:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article is fine, even necessary. Not talking about the article but one of the edits you made. Justanother2 (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? Fitzwilliams (talk) 04:26, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We don't seem to agree on some things. Maybe it's your style being complex and all. Also you could give people time or even a few days to reply and you said something about being a newcomer. Realize there are many types of editors on here and in the same way you are not typical supposedly other people aren't like you.Justanother2 (talk) 13:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to cooperate with you and you are being offesive. Even I reached out for you in your talk page to solve what issues you have with that article. Now will you kindly reply on your own talk page where I have created a new discussion? Please? Fitzwilliams (talk) 17:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to discuss something I'll choose to talk on this pg. Which articles are you editing besides Dornan?Justanother2 (talk) 19:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Currently I am working on Anjuna Ellis' award article. Fitzwilliams (talk) 02:55, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also working on Colin Morgan Fitzwilliams (talk) 02:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Randomly picked Morgan from the two. I don't know what high quality journalism you read; if you want suggestions for literature I'll provide them. I made some changes to the article. One, redundancy is almost never a good idea. Two, there were two extra spaces on the entire page.Justanother2 (talk) 12:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let me inform you first, by 'working on Morgan's article' I meant I am adding unwritten awards there. Now let me give you suggestion, do remember to check the page history before accusing someone. I probably edited his article for the first time, one day ago. So the redundancy, unnecessary spaces aren't done by me. Also you were supposed to talk about issues on Dornan's performance article. What happened to your that concern? Fitzwilliams (talk) 13:00, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have more to say to you, bye.Justanother2 (talk) 13:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fitzwilliams. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ballymoney Drama Festival".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Fitzwilliams,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fitzwilliams:, I was creating this article for a List of awards and nominations received by Brendan Fraser, could you please help me to get summited? Votbek (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am really sorry for not being able to get here earlier. As of now I can see the article having been created. I hope you found help! congratulations on that! Fitzwilliams (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Votbek and you can reach me anytime later if you want. Fitzwilliams (talk) 13:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jamie Dornan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 13:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie, user:ChristieBot, Thanks for your interest. Please reach me if you have any query, suggestions, any time..

The article Jamie Dornan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Jamie Dornan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 14:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamie Dornan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Last of Us (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Alex_21 _TALK 11:24, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have created one there. Fitzwilliams (talk) 11:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Helen O'Hara (journalist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]