Hello, Holy Goo, and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are a course instructor leading a class project.

New to Wikipedia or want to learn about best practices for Wikipedia assignments?

Go through our online training for educators

The training includes instructions for setting up a structured course page, with tools for tracking student work and encouraging peer review. Please also see this helpful advice for instructors.

If you run into problems or want some feedback on your Wikipedia assignment plans, try posting to the education noticeboard.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay after your assignment is finished! Holy Goo (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making them. Read Wikipedia:Disambiguation and have an understanding of how disambiguation works before moving any more. —Xezbeth (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xezbeth: But my moves where I added (surname) after the word were okay, right? Holy Goo (talk) 15:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, there is no other topic besides the surname for the term "Goodier", making the surname de facto primary topic so there is no need for a disambiguator. —Xezbeth (talk) 15:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holy Goo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

I can't see if anybody welcomed you ;) - Thank you for taking care of Mozart, - you don't have to read all discussions mentioned in the revert (don't know if you saw that), because the last one is a summary, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For medical articles we work to write the WP:leads, if not the entire article, as simply as possible without introducing errors. English Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia used extensively by many who speak English as a second language. We therefore try to use common words as well as short sentences. See here for more details. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doc James "Chemical composition" is not a complex or excessively technical term at all. Having "what they are made of" linking to "chemical composition" is too much dumbing down. Holy Goo (talk) 18:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was fine how it was IMO. The leads of our articles should be written in relatively easy to understand English so that they are easily accessible to those who speak English as a second language. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There should be a WP term for the sort of editor who so "owns" a page that they revert your resizing of an overlarge logo. He's hopeless.--Quisqualis (talk) 08:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Were having a vote, take a look.--ZiaLater (talk) 20:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I put sources for the infobox showing that the protests increased. I think the "internal condemnation" means the few government officials that disagreed with the move. Not trying to edit war just wanted to let you know!--ZiaLater (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ZiaLater: Now that you mentioned the protests, it's ok. Holy Goo (talk) 18:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Goo Goo! I wanted to let you know that I am planning to split up the 2014–17 Venezuelan protests into separate articles, the 2014 Venezuelan protests, 2015 Venezuelan protests, 2016 Venezuelan protests and 2017 Venezuelan protests. The protest movement has been very fluid since the start in 2014, it began with waves just generally dissatisfied in 2014, food protests in 2015, recall and election protests in 2016 and now protests against what they call a dictatorship in 2017. Protests have been happening daily for years now and the original article cannot hold all that information anymore. So that is why I am making separate articles. Timeline articles will still exist to give details of day-to-day protests.

So eventually, the Mother of All Protests will be part of the "2017 Venezuelan protests" article, which will be part of the 2014–17 Venezuelan protests article. It'll all be linked up in the lede and the infobox so readers can follow to trail to find information. Does this sound like a good idea? I might do it in a few days or weeks since it will be quite the undertaking, but I think it'll be worth it since the original article is so dense right now. Spreading it out will make its encyclopedic quality so much higher.--ZiaLater (talk) 19:03, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ZiaLater: If the articles 2014–17 Venezuelan protests and Mother of All Protests will continue to exist, I think it's OK to create articles that are more specific, and then add "main article" hatnotes linking to the new pages. The article 2014-17 Venezuelan protests does in fact lack precision, but I didn't know if I could do anything about it. Good luck. Holy Goo (talk) 19:28, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the 2014-17 Venezuelan protests article did lack that precision. A lot of it is focused on the 2014 protests and small mentions of protests in the other years. However, 2017 seems to be ramping up into a big one too...--ZiaLater (talk) 19:33, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ZiaLater: But the article must be kept, because the protests are all related to the Maduro government. Add brief descriptions of the protests in separate sections and add the "main article" hatnotes linking to the new pages. Go ahead. However, I think it's still a bit early to create the article 2017 Venezuelan protests, as it will basically be a duplication of the Mother of All Protests. Holy Goo (talk) 19:37, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to delete anything. There will actually be more, just with some of the information spread to other articles. For the 2017 protest article, I think we might have enough there as well, but in the next few days/weeks it will take me to do this, things might change. Last night was pretty bad.--ZiaLater (talk) 19:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ZiaLater: Just out of curiosity, are you Venezuelan, or currently living in Venezuela? Holy Goo (talk) 19:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't comment on that one. But I am a woman, so there's that. I don't know why some people seem to get that confused.--ZiaLater (talk) 19:51, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ZiaLater: It's ok if you don't want to answer the question, but I didn't use any word that implied gender. Holy Goo (talk) 19:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it wasn't you. It's just the only info I'm willing to share with others :)--ZiaLater (talk) 20:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look.--ZiaLater (talk) 01:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I want to address your comments at the Wikimedia Commons and in this edit summary.

I nominated the image for deletion because of a sincere belief that it lacked appropriate licensing information. I took no pleasure in this and would have preferred an outcome in which the missing evidence was found and the image was kept. My objective is to help maintain the repository's legality (without which it wouldn't be sustainable), not to eliminate access to media.

Regarding the comment that I had "nothing better to do", you might not have noticed that I uploaded the replacement image's current version. I took the time to seek out a higher-resolution copy and enhance it in Adobe Photoshop – a process involving fairly intricate work across multiple layers. I did so because I wanted to ensure that our documentation of the event contained the best images possible.

I sincerely hope that you recognize my intent (even if you disagree with my actions) and that our future interactions occur in the context of collegial collaboration. —David Levy 04:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@David Levy: I do recognize your intent. I am very sorry for being rude. Honestly, I was angrier at the fact that Commons had stricter rules than I thought. I am sorry for assuming you had bad intentions. Thanks a lot, and I hope we continue to contribute to articles seeking to report all the chaos and injustice that is going on in Venezuela under Maduro. I am Brazilian, with relatives living in Venezuela, and I'm helping to spread the information by translating to portuguese many articles about current events in Venezuela. I am sorry. Peace. Holy Goo (talk) 05:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I finally created the 2014 Venezuelan protests article. Take a look at it and make changes if you'd like. If you think some thing should be removed from the 2014–17 Venezuelan protests and placed in the 2014 Venezuelan protests article, go ahead and try that too, the 2014–17 article needs some slimming down.--ZiaLater (talk) 09:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ZiaLater: Nice. Yes, much of the content needs to be removed, since both articles are very similar. Also, there should be a link to the 2014 protests article somewhere, as a hatnote of a section. Holy Goo (talk) 11:04, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd prefer trying to transfer some of the notable things. I'll begin adding some info for 2015-2017 eventually.--ZiaLater (talk) 11:55, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you stop deleting covfefe from Template:Donald Trump? It is an actual sub page of Donald Trump's use of social media. You can delete it IF the page is deleted. – Nixinova (talk • edits) 21:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nixinova: It is just dumb, can't you see that? Just forget covefefe, man. And don't add images that are copyvios or I'll tag them for speedy deletion again. Holy Goo (talk) 21:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand wanting to forget covfefe, but all of meaning and interpretation? Are you sure you want to go that far? I'm fine with it if you insist. Mainly didn't want to see one without the other. InedibleHulk (talk) 02:50, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@InedibleHulk: Covfefe is just a typo in a social media. It is not filosophical in any way at all. But don't worry because the article will be deleted or will be merged. Holy Goo (talk) 04:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The word itself is just a typo, the rest of the bullshit is almost entirely meaning and interpretation. But yeah, no worries. I argued to delete the whole thing, too. InedibleHulk (talk) 17:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the section header you created. With regard to the title you chose and some of what you wrote there, please focus on content when you work on article talk pages. Please see WP:TPG as well as WP:NPA. This is also just common sense; successful editing relies on persuading others that your proposals are well-aligned with WP policies and guidelines, and since focusing on contributors is not aligned with the policies and guidelines you shoot yourself in the foot. Jytdog (talk) 18:16, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your change because this text has been created over time through lengthy discussions. Also, please avoid making accusations in edit summaries. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate - 03:28, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Note that this is a routine note which can be sent and renewed every 12 months to all editors who edit on topics where arbitrary sanctions are in place. Please see WP:ACDS#Awareness and alerts for more details. Thank you, —PaleoNeonate - 03:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holy Goo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

Nerd1a4i (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Novo30.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holy Goo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Holy Goo! You created a thread called How can I make a thumbnail have the width of the page? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Holy Goo,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Isingness and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Manterrupting should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manterrupting .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Isingness}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Isingness (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bageense! You created a thread called Article in many languages but not in my language. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 2600:1700:6870:4ED0:FC77:725A:B58B:C6E3 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manterrupting. Since you had some involvement with the Manterrupting redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk _YO! 11:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In my edit of Bolsonaro I removed the category Brazilian fascists but I left Racism in Brazil. However, I now see my recorded changes have NOTHING to do with this. I didn't add all that stuff. Could it be that my edit coincided with somebody else's? CodeInconnu (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bageense! You created a thread called How to create list with two columns? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Neue Deutsche Härte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erbach (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article is called Gustavo Franco feel free to take a look at it. Thank you bobdog54 (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ele Não movement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Madonna

Fourth-wave feminism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Madonna

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DPL bot,  Done --Bageense^(disc.) 15:20, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Bageense! You created a thread called I need a redirect be deleted at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my availability will be sporadic and unpredictable for the next four weeks. I'll be around some of the time, but may not always respond in a timely manner. If you need me urgently, please email me through the website. Hopefully you can carry on with the Draft, while I'm in slow mode. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot, Sure. I've also been struggling to find some time, and when I'm finally free and willing to translate, the "internet cafe", as you said, decides not to open. I will try to translate at least one section per day (from tomorrow on). And to think that I still have the article about the economic crisis to translate... everything will take longer than expected. Translating is a challenging task. --Bageense^(disc.) 22:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot, Once again, I forgot that "tomorrow" was Sunday. Well, I've translated a section now.

You haven't replied to me... are you interested in helping me translate the economic crisis article? Or just review my translation? I need an answer because I don't think I can do that alone... I'm not sure. I'd probably give up on the idea. But it's ok if you're not interested, this is all voluntary work. --Bageense^(disc.) 16:06, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but not for several weeks. Mathglot (talk) 22:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Franco Volpi (philosopher), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ixocactus (talk) 21:28, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franco Volpi (philosopher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franco Volpi (philosopher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ixocactus (talk) 08:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Math Lady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Math Lady, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:28, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oi. Eu gostei do artigo https://pt.teknopedia.teknokrat.ac.id/wiki/Lista_de_crises_econ%C3%B4micas_no_Brasil e comecei a traduzir aqui em https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/User:Proto-hipster/sandbox e depois notei que vc é o autor. Talvez teria interesse em me ajudar com a tradução (porque meu inglês não é muito bom). Eu agradeceria muito se você pudesse revisar o que já traduzi e quando estiver pronto pode publicar se prefir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proto-hipster (talk • contribs) 22:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-hipster, Ah, pra variar, eu comecei uma tradução e não terminei. Obrigado, sua ajuda vai me incentivar a concluir o trabalho. --Bageense^(disc.) 00:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bageense. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Math Lady, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Living presidents of the United States, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Living presidents of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brazil's fall (The Economist).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:28, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

É um mapa de isoglossas do estado de Minas Gerais, segundo pesquisa da UFJF de 1977. O mapa forma três zonas dialetais, conforme a descrição. Pode ver uma versão alternativa aqui: https://pseudolinguista.blogspot.com/2014/03/mapa-dos-sotaques-em-minas-gerais.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gondolabúrguer (talk • contribs) 19:27, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sérgio Moro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

his name has no diacritic

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RodRabelo7 (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Consegue encontrar o vídeo do Navarro em que ele fala sobre a origem do termo? Provavelmente ainda tá salvo em algum chat perdido no seu celular. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7: Outra hora vejo isso, estou ocupado trabalhando nas imagens que carrreguei no Commons pro artigo dos topônimos. --Bageense^(disc.) 21:19, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Trabalhando de graça? RodRabelo7 (talk) 22:42, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sim, trouxa que sou. Mas vou carregar também as imagens no meu blogue, em uma postagem que ainda estou por fazer. Agora que estou mais qualificado, não vou mais ficar fazendo tudo anonimamente não. --Bageense^(disc.) 11:49, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RodRabelo7: Não sei se tu quer deixar tua opinião sobre como está saindo a seção "tipos de topônimos" que estou criando (com os esquemas e tal): https://pt.teknopedia.teknokrat.ac.id/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio:Bageense/Testes/Tt-gnB --Bageense^(disc.) 16:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Diminua as imagens, pelo amor de Deus. E talvez exista alguma forma de fazer isso com wikitext, se você estiver a fim de treinar rudimentos de uma linguagem de programação inútil. Olhando por alto o artigo, só aviso que tá errado usar aspas e meter itálico ao mesmo tempo, tenho quase certeza quanto a isso. Ah, e lembre-se de que o Detetive Paquiderme anda a espreitar-me as edições caçando migalhas de evidências de que eu seja sock sabe-se lá dessa vez de quem; então, tente não se expor muito, nunca se sabe… Já achou o vídeo de Pindorama? Preciso dele. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eu não costumo apagar nossas conversas, mas devo ter apagado essa. Procurei de várias formas e não achei nada. Bem feito, quem manda dar uma de diva e trocar os chats. Há poucos dias eu tive um trabalhão para achar o artigo do Ayron Rodrigues sobre a história do tupi. Então a culpa é sua. --Bageense^(disc.) 12:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tupi language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Isolating, SOV and SVO.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]