Welcome!

Hello, Lovetravel86, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -MBK₀₀₄ 04:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your desire to create the missing years for the Timeline of spaceflight, but so far the two that you have created are vastly inadequate to what is considered even the standard we (those who are maintaining them) would like to present. Please see how a finished example should look (2008 in spaceflight) and the general guidelines (WP:TLS). Accordingly, I must ask you to not create any additional years unless they can be properly formatted. Thanks, -MBK₀₀₄ 06:41, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MBK004 I'm a first time editor of wikipedia and used what little information i had to start work on those pages so others can continue to add pictures and more detailed information which you and others have done, the pages look great!! take it easy user: Lovetravel8615 July 2009

We were going to get to them within the next two months or so because myself and one other editor are currently going through every TLS year and updating them to a new format. I tend to stick to the newer years while my colleague is working on the earlier years. Our work status is listed here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Timeline of spaceflight/Timeline Status. (You may want to look at the three that you did create, 1975 in spaceflight, 1977 in spaceflight, and 1978 in spaceflight, to see the progress so far). -MBK₀₀₄ 04:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you need any help, then feel free to ask one of us. --GW… 08:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MBK004 and GW for your support and yes hopefully i'll prove useful, i have a little more to add. When the timelines finished it should look great!! No worries user: lovetravel8617 July 2009

• Could you possibly have a look at the preview before you save pages. It might help to eliminate a few problems like this and this. I also noticed a couple of mistakes that you've made several times; you often put the launch date in the "d-date=" field as well as the "date" field ("d-date" is supposed to contain the date that the spacecraft decayed from orbit, and (re)entered the atmosphere), on several occasions you have removed the "|}" from the end of the list, which has caused display problems, and you sometimes put the name of the payload in the "rocket" field. I thought that if I pointed those out, it might help you to avoid making them in the future. This shows the difference between one of your edits (left), and the same launch once I had made a few improvements (right). Finally, these two pages might be useful for finding information (although the format does take some getting used to). Thanks. --GW… 20:22, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

G'day GW i know i made some mistakes while editing, of course for a first try i knew i would, thanks for fixing those mistakes! I have a little more to add, the pages are looking great!! so you and MBK004 are doing the same format for the space timelines, by the time your finished it should be a great resource!! thanks for your time user: lovetravel86 24 July 2009

I have nominated Army Air Force of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Army Air Force of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Zhang He (talk) 02:44, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your hard work on the air force articles from World Air Force information files. The thing is it's good to get such information in context amongst other data on the same subject, rather than in isolation. Would you thus please mind not creating new article stubs? Please place the new information in the 'Military of X' article, or, when there's a separate article on the air force, in the 'X air force' article. It's the best place for the military aviation history of any country - it goes in the history section of the 'X air force' article. Hope you're having a good holiday break, and Happy New Year from New Zealand, Buckshot06 (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sort-of upset they scrapped the air combat capability, but there are many other things that have more direct relevance than attack aircraft we can now focus on. The problem is intangible; how many other nations will take less notice of us if we don't have an ability to come to their support - especially Malaysia and Singapore through the Five Power Defence Arrangements. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article History of the Estonian Air Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs desperate copyedit. May be covered already.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. iBen^discuss/_contribsHow's my driving? 03:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lovetravel86.

I've just deleted the article you created under AV-8S Matador because the text was copied almost verbatim from the source that you cited, the World Aircraft Information Files File 148 Sheet 6. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and it is not sufficient simply to help yourself to somebody else's work, re-arrange a few words here and there, and then pass it off as your own.

It's true that we currently lack detailed coverage of this Harrier variant. If you want to document it better, you should probably aim to expand Hawker Siddeley Harrier first; we don't generally create articles for subtypes of aircraft unless the main article is already so large that we need to split it. Feel free to write about the AV-8S in your own words. Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 05:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After discovering the text copied in the AV-8S article, I reviwed a few more of your contributions and found other text copied verbatim or nearly verbatim from the World Aircraft Information Files. I have removed sections or paragraphs from:

• Military of Suriname
• Armed Forces of the Republic of Kazakhstan
• Niger Armed Forces
• Royal Cambodian Air Force
• Bulgarian Air Force
• Ghana Air Force
• Lesotho Defence Force (there were actually one or two sentences in the middle of this paragraph that were not infringing, but they no longer made any sense with the surrounding text removed, so I removed the whole section).

In a number of other cases, it was a close call. The text that you placed in the following articles is extremely close to that of the source that you used, but I think not quite close enough to warrant removal:

• Namibian Air Force
• Military of Sierra Leone
• Military of Guinea-Bissau
• Military of Burkina Faso

In yet another case, the text was again almost verbatim, but because it was so short (one sentence), I left this in place as well:

• Somali Air Corps

Finally, please be careful with content that you add to Wikipedia. I noticed a few cases where the material that you added was not what the source said. For example:

• Military of Mauritania -- you wrote that two Defenders were shot down, while your source said it was one Defender
• Ghana Air Force -- you wrote that the Skyvans' transport and coastal patrol role had been extended; your source said that the Skyvans' transport role had been extended to coastal patrol as well.
• Cameroon Air Force -- you wrote that Alouettes and Gazelles were amongst the French equipment originally operated by the air force; your source said that these helicopters were part of a subsequent order from France.
• In another instance, of which I unfortunately lost track, you said that seven of a particular aircraft were supplied to a particular air force, while your source said six. This error is still out there.

In presenting all this to you, I do not hope to discourage your contributions to Wikipedia; I do not need to tell you that our coverage of air forces outside Europe and North America still leaves a lot to be desired. But please, be careful! If there's anything that I can do to help, please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers --Rlandmann (talk) 07:02, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Polish Army Aviation. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Polish Army. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Polish Army - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. First Light (talk) 00:39, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LoveTravel. Thanks for your addition of a table to the NAF article. However I have had to revert it. It is unfinished and has redlink templates, a strange, wrong, template, and you did not remove most of the previous bulletpoint list of aircraft. Please do fix this, and we can reinsert the table. Best regards from Aotearoa, Buckshot06 (talk) 05:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please fix the messy table inserted at Nigerian Air Force, and move it up the page? Buckshot06 (talk) 23:21, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Royal Thai Air Force, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interceptor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited South African Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ingwe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
I notice you added a source to some of the swathes of unsourced (and dubious) content in Zimbabwe National Army, whilst turning a list into a table. However, that source doesn't actually mention Zimbabwe. Can you explain? Has there been some mistake? A lot of the military-by-country articles get speculative (or outright fictional) cruft added to them by other editors; adding a source which doesn't actually support it may make the problem worse. bobrayner (talk) 13:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I searched for other uses of that URL, and it appears you did the same thing on Military of Yemen too. Perhaps it was just an accident. Is it possible that other spurious sources were added to other tables? If so, I'd like to clean them up. bobrayner (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in this discussion at WP:Aircraft regarding the splitting of the Operators section into current and Former operators. Please comment if you have an opinion.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aérospatiale SA 315B Lama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HAL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. 220 of ^Borg 07:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding so many flagicons. It's a problem. Many of those little flag pictures are misleading or anachronistic, and few aircraft fit neatly in a single national pigeonhole. Perhaps you should seek consensus at WT:MOSFLAG first. bobrayner (talk) 19:20, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ghana Air Force page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be making a lot of changes to the operators sections of aircraft articles without providing any source for the change, while leaving existing references in place that do not agree with the change - examples include Central African Republic Air Force ([Central African Republic Air Force here] and here), Nanchang Q-5 (here). Please stop doing this - no changes should be made to articles without reliable sources and by leaving existing references in place against a revised text you are misrepresenting what the original source says. You have been told previously that changes must be sourced to reliable sources - see here.Nigel Ish (talk) 16:28, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Ford vehicles, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ford Fairlane and Ford Falcon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovetravel86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not long since someone made the changes you have just reversed. Why did you make them? Regards, Eddaido (talk) 08:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovetravel86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your great edits at Aston Martin. After a long absence, I started editing again. Appreciate any help to improve the article! I'm more versed in the car business, less so in the cars themselves BsBsBs (talk) 08:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Nicky Katt, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! DonIago (talk) 14:00, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Template:GM Korea. When you were adding content to the page, you added duplicate arguments to a template which can cause issues with how the template is rendered. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find these errors as they will display in red at the top of the page. Thanks! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:46, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovetravel86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi the Grand Siena is in production, for more information see ^ https://www.autossegredos.com.br/segredos/fiat-grand-siena-tem-producao-confirmada-ate-o-fim-de-2019/ ^ https://www.autossegredos.com.br/marcas/fiat-marcas/mercado-fiat-grand-siena-2019-e-ofertado-por-r-42-990/

The first generation of Siena (178) production was stopped in 2016

https://www.autossegredos.com.br/mercado/obituario-fiat-siena-el-tem-producao-encerrada/

Hi! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.103.135 (talk) 12:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t add or change content without verifying it by citing a reliable source, as you have done on the Belgian Air Component article. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources –Thank you FOX 52 (talk) 06:05, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Calliopejen1 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you reformat the source given? What is the name of the author? The name of the article? The URL if available online? The page # if not?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hazelwood railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hazelwood railway station, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovetravel86! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovetravel86. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hazelwood railway station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lovetravel86. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hazelwood railway station".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]