Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present.

The article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth and Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of the musicians involved have their own pages, surely making the CHCMC notable by association. And I've already included several reliable secondary sources. - PastelLilac (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PastelLilaceven if Adele performed a duet with Elton John at my house making international headlines, unfortunately it won’t be notable as notability is not inherited. Sorry. I live in Melbourne, that centre isn’t notable (for the purposes of Wikipedia). — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 03:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying I could keep piling on the reliable secondary sources (of which there are many to choose from), and you won't budge from this position? And a one off show in your house is a bit different from a venue used by hundreds of musicians over the span of almost a decade. I take it you prefer your commercial stuff. Kate Ceberano's first band grew out of the CHCMC. - PastelLilac (talk) 07:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those sources do not constitute significant coverage of the subject which is the hall, not the artist who is notable. I won’t “budge” from my decision to draft the article, but another editor will review my decision as it’s now in the draft queue. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 09:19, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The eMelbourne source is merely to show how the CHCMC is summarised within Melbourne music more broadly, and by a reliable, encyclopedic source. It's a relevant and notable episode in the history of Australian music. Or as the Australian Centre for Contemporary Art put it, one of sixteen "defining moments" that shaped Australian art since 1968. And nowhere is the CHCMC referred to as a "hall". - PastelLilac (talk) 13:03, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. I have expanded the draft quite a bit now. I would also like to WP:DRAFTOBJECT for the following reason: per WP:DRAFTNO, "Editors should generally avoid moving an article to draftspace in the following circumstances: ... Another editor is actively working on the article, e.g. ... there have been constructive edits made within the last hour". If you scroll down the edit history, I had made 4 constructive edits to the page in the hour prior you draftifying it. My latest edit was three minutes before. Per WP:DRAFTOBJECT, "Other editors, including the author of the page, but excluding editors with a conflict of interest, have a right to object to draftifying the page. If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and, if necessary, list it at AfD." Since there's no conflict of interest (I am in no way connected to the topic, just interested in it), it seems to me the article should go back to the mainspace. I'm confident notability has been established at this point, but plan to keep expanding the article anyway. It's a fascinating topic and there's a lot of material to go through. - PastelLilac (talk) 00:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth for comments about the article, and Talk:Fair Work Ombudsman v Quest South Perth/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of KwanFlakes -- KwanFlakes (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaxnaCarta. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Qantas Airways Ltd v Transport Workers Union of Australia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		This award is given in recognition to MaxnaCarta for accumulating at least 500 points during the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears Award
		This award is given in recognition to MaxnaCarta for accumulating at least 50 points during each week of the September 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 19,000+ articles and 35,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 26,884.6 points) during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:39, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		This award is given to MaxnaCarta for doing over 25 re-reviews, in the September 2024 NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! – DreamRimmer (talk) 14:39, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harrolds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vogue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pell v The Queen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 12:23, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just a reminder that, if you have time, you are welcome to join the GA backlog drive; it runs until the end of October. You are receiving this message because you signed up on the drive page but have not yet listed any reviews. We hope to see you there! Either way, happy editing! —Ganesha811 (talk) 05:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One more reminder, now that we're a few days away from the end. Don't worry - you don't need to finish your reviews before Nov 1, just to start them! -- asilvering (talk) 17:19, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pell v The Queen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pell v The Queen for comments about the article, and Talk:Pell v The Queen/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 11:23, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pell v The Queen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the verdict of Pell v The Queen could not be reported on properly for two months? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pell v The Queen. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pell v The Queen), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the history merge template from the article. No cut and paste was involved, therefore there is no need for a history merge. Article should be good to go for DYK. Mjroots (talk) 09:47, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Mjroots, I left a comment. Cheers — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 22:02, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]