Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Urartu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Sevan and Paleo-Balkans

Halidzor Fortress (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Persians

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Pogrom of Armenians in Baku (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Russian

Samtskhe-Javakheti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Greater Armenia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Sevan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Armenian

Kirovabad pogrom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ganja

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted, with the summary "rv primarily for grammar reasons, but also what it says is neutral - it IS in the disputed region, and then it says it's in the NKR and Azerbaijan. this is the result of a long time of consensus, please propose changes to this talk page first. thanks". Basically, there's been a long dispute over how to describe it, but saying it's in the disputed region (which is true) and then explaining the dispute is much preferred to picking one side of the dispute right away. Also, keep in mind that our article for the country is at Nagorno-Karabakh Republic, not Nagorno-Karabakh. Now, you may have a point with saying it's part of the NKR right away - but please propose any changes like that on the article's talk page first, as the inevitable edit wars that come from people unilaterally editing NK-related articles will not be abided. Thanks.--Golbez (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Surely you are not serious. A legendary mythical battle that never happened, complete with day of the month it took place! Meowy 18:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Armenian Question, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Grandmaster has filed an AE report on Nagorno-Karabakh trying to limit participation in the article. Take a look as a user active on the article’s talk pages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nagorno-Karabakh_article Dehr (talk) 16:59, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Shelling of Stepanakert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Shelling of Stepanakert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shamkhor Massacre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shamkhor Massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NovaSkola (talk) 12:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the quote attributed to Mehmed Reshid in the Massacres of Diyarbakir (1895) article was made during another well known massacre in Diyarbekir in spring 1915.--Rafy talk 23:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Բարև ախպեր ջան, դու հայերեն գիտե՞ս: Եթե հա, մի հատ գրի, իրար հետ համագործակցենք: --Yerevanci (talk) 02:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Առանձնապես ոչ մի բան, ասում եմ իրար օգնենք, հայկական էջերը մաքրենք էշերից: Կարելի ա կարևորը էջերը առանձնացնել, հասկանալի պատճառներով: Իմ կարծիքով կարևոր են հիմնականում պատմության վերաբերյալ էջերը կապված Թււրքիայի հանցագործությունների և Արցախի հետ: --Yerevanci (talk) 02:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, same for you. If you have any problem or need any help, please feel more than welcome to ask. By the way, where are you from??--Yerevanci (talk) 02:26, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I would perfer to keep them too, but at the moment, there is a rule against them in info boxes. Hoping the rule get's removed someday.. TheShadowCrow (talk) 20:22, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Shelling of Stepanakert at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Ishtar456 (talk) 23:29, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I really think that the citations on this article needs to be formatted. If you click on "Cite" (above) then a drop done on will appear on the left top. You can select "web", "news", "book". Fill out the form with the information from the source and add it. I do not think that the article can pass without you do that.--Ishtar456 (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has been a while since I first review it. Are you planning on making any changes? I do not feel I can pass judgement on the reliability of the sources unless I can comprehend the sources and I cannot as they are written. Please let me know if you plan to correct this so I can finish the review. Thanks, --Ishtar456 (talk) 22:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would like to see the reference formatted. If I remember there are only 4.--Ishtar456 (talk) 07:58, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think what the message you left me was about a DYK nom. But you did not reference which one. I have reviewed dozens in the last couple days, could you please remind which one we are talking about. It is also a good idea to leave messages about it on the nom template. Thanks.--Ishtar456 (talk) 06:18, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to pick the brain of more experienced users about the ongoing exchange between [User:Grandmaster] and a couple of administrators. Grandmaster suggests to restrict access to some and potentially to all articles in Armenia-Azerbaijan by excluding new users [1]. You can reply on my home page if you wish. Dehr (talk) 19:23, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Shelling of Stepanakert, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the shelling of Stepanakert, during the Nagorno-Karabakh War, caused mass casualties and widespread damage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shelling of Stepanakert.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alla Levonyan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ararat

Battle of Sevan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingdom of Armenia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the content you recently placed there - it is off-topic: Aghuri is actually a completely different place. Maybe you could add that content to the Mount Ararat article. Meowy 02:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Armenian National Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANI (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Azerbaijani Land Forces, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PKM, Tovuz and NSV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Congratulations, Nocturnal781, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thank you for improving and expanding coverage of Armenia and Azerbaijan related topics, and for all your contributions to the encyclopedia. Keep up the great work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:11, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appreciate it alot : ) Nocturnal781 (talk) 03:16, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Yuri Khatchaturov. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kid Ink, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. OlYeller21^Talktome 16:18, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The IP user 78.x.x.x continues to almost daily remove and vandalize the article, and removes anything and everything that has to do with/related to Armenians. Can you let an admin know about this and have them lock the page from IP users. Thanks. 75.51.169.57 (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Nocturnal. I saw you wrote this. Do you know, are Akori and Arguri the names of the same village? Thanks. --vacio 20:14, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 18:17, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deportation of Azerbaijanis from Armenia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JediXmaster (talk) 05:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alla Levonyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of any notability under WP:MUSIC, incl. releases, international profile or chart performance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Columbia Point Dawgs

added links pointing to Brockton and Harbor Point

Latin Kings (gang)

added a link pointing to Lawrence

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Capture of Garadaghly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garadaghly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Florencia 13, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

joe decker^talk 15:22, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have a stronger case in questioning the relevancy of adding his ethnicity, because his ethnicity was not the given motivation. Or else, and here you need to consult other Wikipedians, is if the event fit under discrimination when the perpetrator is diagnosed with schizophrenia. In most countries (including France) there can be no criminal charges left if mental illness was behind the said act (he was hospitalized after the event). In France discrimination is written in constitution and there are several other laws [2], but since a subject with mental illness can not be prosecuted, can there be claims of discrimination? Can there be discrimination if there can be no prosecution for it? Technically Parishan is in the wrong to add it under discrimination by this simple fact. Reason why I was against it being included in the article at the beginning. Furthermore people suffering with mental illness are more often than not a persecuted group and mixing those cases with deliberate and actual criminal acts open the door to discriminations against them. I changed my mind, because this info has to go somewhere. It's a complex issue, leaving his ethnicity we must add his mental illness, if we do that, we further add another group... or just removing Armenian. But it seems Parishan is set to keep it. I think you need a third opinion here. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 23:40, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I left a comment [3] in a userpage on this issue (if there can be said it's discrimination if someone can not be sentenced being criminally responsible). Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it might be a better idea to get more opinions on this. Also I agree with mentioning his mental health is definitely important and the whole case is too soon to tell.Nocturnal781 (talk) 04:17, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have opened a case, I will comment when I have time (remind me if I forget). But just to note that I disagree with you on the reliability of the source. Reason is that we can assume that the Armenian organization which condemned the act probably verified prior to making such an official condemnation (don't you think?). What may stir conflicts is beyond mere use of unreliable sources. If an Earthquake only damages a community church, we can not use this as proof of discrimination on Wikipedia because no one can be held responsible for a crime. In this case the perpetrator was hospitalized and medicated just after the event and they considered his case was enough sever that they decided to renew his hospitalization rather than handing him to authorities. Even if we didn't have a case of mental-illness, we would still have a problem. When we say discrimination, we often intent job offers, taxations, intimidations... actions which generally go beyond one individual claimed-perceived retaliation... often in discrimination there is a form of universality in the act... car targeting group of Muslims is not an usual event in France. Adding that as an example of discrimination gives this impression that there is some universality and as such that similar grave occurrences of homicide (we're talking at attempting to kill a lot of people) attempts against Muslims in France isn't that rare. This is as far as I can come in wording what I mean. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 05:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am just going by Wikipedia:NEWSORG which states reliable news sources would be mainstream news and Liberation.fr is not mainstream. I am not saying I don't believe he is or not but we don't have a reliable source to base that off in accordance to Wikipedia. Also the discrimination point you bring up sounds very valid, he seems to be mentally deranged. Someone with mental health issues can be persuaded by those around him and even the media easily. Since this case hasn't even went on accusing him of such seems to be wrong.Nocturnal781 (talk) 06:11, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but when an information smells true, it will probably be confirmed afterward from other sources. So your argumentation on that noticeboard will probably be outdated later on because it is standing on things Parishan and we have no control on (availability of sources in dictating what happened or did not happen). We're not slaves of newsmedias. :) It is like arbitrarily throwing a coin to decide who win or lose between you and Parishan. :) There ought to be better ways to resolve issues.

Take Adam and Eve (I so love using the allegorical knowledge contained in religious literature, it never gets outdated) eating from the tree of knowledge of what is right or wrong...what is right or wrong is decided depending on the available information in the present, which may change...(when more info is found) it's temporary. If you feed your position on temporary things, it will be mortal. On the other hand, if you feed it from the tree of what makes a position imperishable, ... it will stand true irregardless of anything new that might be added.

I still maintain (and Parishan has to address it) that there is something inherently wrong in using as evidence of discrimination someone who committed an act in the course of a mental illness (and considered the gravest of it all, schizophrenia) outbreak. Those sufferers are already victims of discrimination in every sphere of society. He is also weakening the position that Muslims are being discriminated in France, as if no better examples could be presented. Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will be taking a break, but when I wrote that I agreed the case should be included in the article, I was not aware that they prolonged his hospitalization and decided to not hand him to authorities. If you decide to remove the entire case rather than just Armenian (which is what would be the most reasonable thing to do), you can add a link in the talkpage of the article the discussion we had here as rational. Bye Yaḥyā ‎ (talk) 18:33, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Herman Norton Barnum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Rhinopias (talk) 23:02, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trinitarios, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawrence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wait for until he has fought for his 3rd fight in UFC which should be early 2020 and add in the content and source then resubmit. The draft article will be in Wikipedia system for 6 months before it is deleted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arman Tsarukyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arman Tsarukyan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:13, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Items seized by Columbia Point Dawgs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:09, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Artem Dalakian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently been editing Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:25, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Shusha massacre has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Zakaria Aguletsi, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:24, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Battle of Kummuh is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yenidoğan, Aralık, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Bryce.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Sephardic Jews in Romania. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AmusingWeasel (talk) 12:28, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Olympian ^loquere 03:10, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I hope you are fine. I have removed a lot of unreferenced information. The new page review is one of the last approval stages, so when I see a page like this with a large amount of unreferenced information, and no {{In use}} tag to show that the page is undergoing a major build, I tend to err on the side of caution and remove the unreferenced information. The easiest solution is to add the tag to indicate the page in under construction. This prevents me and other editors from editing the page until the process is complete and the tag is removed. Please assume good faith of me, as I do of you. By all means add the information again when you can add the references. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:19, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nocturnal781,

This is regarding your recent edits on my draft page.

You noted that the "Whole article needs to be formatted and edited all around. Not ready to be on Wikipedia."

Could you kindly share some examples of places where the formatting and editing are lacking?

Thanks!

Regards,

EditorRanjitKSharma Editorranjitksharma (talk) 10:35, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Armenians of Julfa is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, did you really mean to decline Draft:Ghanshyam Gupta Zaveri as 'test edit'? It's almost 20Kb in size, that's quite a test. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sassoun Massacre you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 06:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sassoun Massacre you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sassoun Massacre for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Buidhe -- Buidhe (talk) 00:43, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sephardic Jews in Romania, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Agulis (historical), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agulis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:56, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armenians of Julfa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armenians of Julfa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 21:03, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nocturnal781:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1700 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Armen Kazarian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armen Kazarian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BuySomeApples (talk) 23:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Armen Kazarian

added a link pointing to Armenian

Mirzoyan-Terdjanian organization

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armen Kazarian, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Goris Cave Dwellings. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 08:33, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Illegal drug trade in Armenia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Illegal drug trade in Azerbaijan. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. James Armenian Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. James Armenian Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Goris Cave Dwellings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Illegal drug trade in Armenia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Illegal drug trade in Azerbaijan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Illegal drug trade in Armenia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nocturnal781. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Illegal drug trade in Azerbaijan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]