Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBUILDING, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Palazzo di Città and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Palazzo di Città, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Sirio (disambiguation) are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo di Città (Ivrea), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Villa Ravera, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references are required.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Villa Ravera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Villa Ravera, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:57, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Villa Ravera, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarfatti Building is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarfatti Building until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Iseult ^Δx parlez moi 21:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. As I state at the AFD page, I am rooting for you and for this article to be kept. It looks like you can be a great contributor in an area where there's a gap in English wikipedia editors. I would be thrilled if you'd be interested in working together to create a proper top-level article about official heritage registries in Italy, and either way I would like to provide help with infoboxes and categories and such that would be relevant (help like is provided at wp:HSITES for many other countries. --Doncram (talk) 22:30, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But please pay attention to my comments in the AFD about this article apparently being a translation to English of an Italian wikipedia article. In this case the Italian article was developed by you yourself, so there is not really any issue about giving proper attribution to the original author(s) of an article. But documenting that it is a translation and linking to the original article is still important for other reasons, such as for helping to ensure that the fix of some error in one is also done in the other. Or for identifying any pattern of problems.

Specifically, when you translate a page you must follow Help:Translation#License requirements, about the first edit summary and about a template for the Talk page. If you don't in the future, that will lead to trouble for you, which will make editing in the English wikipedia less enjoyable. I do hope you will contribute more, and that you will find your way to easily complying with the requirements. sincerely, --Doncram (talk) 06:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Doncram:! Thank you very much for your enthusiasm and support! And thank you for the resources you showed me. I should have just included the reference to the fact that it is a translation moments ago. As far as the registry, unfortunately I do not know whether one actually exists at national level, but I will do more research. On the other hand, I do know that we have Lombardia Beni Culturali in Lombardy, even though from some past research I could not fully understand what it means for a property to be listed there, and a Kunst und Kultur database for the Autonomous Province of Bolzano (example of a building: [1]), with information available both in German and Italian (German being co-official there). This last databse/registry is possibly more documented on Wikimedia projects, as a banner has even been created to be displayed in Wikimedia categories (see here: [2]). Like you, I deplore the apparent lack of a registry in Italy like those of France, Canada, the UK, the US and Switzerland (and many more), and would love to uncover more about it. With Italian being my mother tongue, I can definitely help you with that, I hope! sincerely, --Plumbago Capensis (talk) 07:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good, thanks. I browsed a bit in the Lombardy Cultural History pages (https://www.lombardiabeniculturali.it/ ) It seems not to be a heritage registry like the NRHP; there is no nomination and review and approval process apparent. It is more like librarians working separately or together to catalog things. https://www.lombardiabeniculturali.it/progetto/ seems to define the project.

It apparently indexes/lists 17,885 "records" about "Lombardy's architectural heritage: monumental complexes, public and religious buildings, rural buildings of historical interest, noble residences, fortified architectures, private residences, industrial archeology buildings." To be accessed through "Architectures" search screen. I am thinking that means there are that many photos or other documents, not that there are 17,885 buildings or monuments that anyone is identifying as being of special interest.

Or actually there may be 17,885 buildings or similar covered. But for example https://www.lombardiabeniculturali.it/architetture/schede/MI100-00726/ about one building, simply does not have enough information for an article. This is like a house identified in a preliminary survey of historic resources in an area, as is done by US states and counties etc. But only some of such items are deemed significant enough and get well enough documented by an extensive nomination document, to become listed on a registry.

I do hope there is some national level registry. I can't find it now, but there was one page explaining development of SIRBeC information system and how it relates to a national catalog system being developed. By the way, I nota that "Home ›Places of Culture›" lists 128 museums or similar institutions, most of which themselves could probably have Wikipedia articles. --Doncram (talk) 08:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doncram: I'll give it a more proper look too. And have you seen the Sudtirolean (pseudo?) registry? Plumbago Capensis (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't found any South Tyrol(?) local registry. It's hard to get past promotional(?)-type pages like TOP HISTORIC SIGHTS IN SOUTH TYROL, ITALY. Although most or all of the places listed there do appear to be Wikipedia-notable:

1. Trauttmansdorff Castle and Gardens
2. Brixen Cathedral
3. Bolzano Franciscan Friary
4. Neustift Abbey
5. Innichen Abbey

1. Church tower of Lake Resia [awkward wording, try Lake Resia and then look for a church...] [Hey that worked, check out this photo from the Reschensee article, it is the Graun Church's tower. Why is its base underwater?]
2. Scena Castle
3. South Tyrol Museum of Archaeology
4. Sigmundskron Castle
5. Tyrol Castle
6. Hocheppan Castle
7. Marienberg Abbey
8. Trostburg Castle
9. Haderburg Castle

A regional or even a city-specific or town-specific local registry can be helpful in developing articles. Such lower-than-national=level designations can have a special color and infobox and all that, as was done for Los Angeles, California's many Los Angeles Historic-Cultural Monument (LAHCM)]-designated sites. All of which got listed in Wikipedia, and many got articles, while others are redlinks which probably could become separate articles. The LAHCM listing was accepted as a significant positive factor supporting wikipedia-notablity in any AFDs. And the list is a pretty good working list to guide article creations.

It would be great to find an Italian national or regional or local registry, and establish what type of info is generally available for each item (like how the NRHP has an extensive nomination/registration document for each). And built out a list of all the items, and have a bunch of redlinks immediately where they all are pretty much assured to be acceptable for having articles, if you like. Then make hay. --Doncram (talk) 02:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Followup: Sarfatti AFD closed "Keep", i guess mainly on the Lombardy historic places site being deemed the official registry, which i was not sure about.

Also, by the way, I have just tried the Wiki tool for aiding in translation (probably linked from wp:TRANSLATE) and found it to be very useful. One small thing it does is put in the correct edit summary I was speaking of, automatically. I tried first with translating an article from French wikipedia, which turned out to be pretty complicated for me. I did "publish" it, but to my userspace not to mainspace, see User:Doncram/Union Rempart, so that I can keep on working on it. The "publish" step created that edit summary. It seems u can open a translation and while it is incomplete it will just be kept in some space for draft tranlations, which you can return to easily. As you may be aware, the English wikipedia editors chose to turn OFF the auto-google translation step in the ideal process, because too many bad articles were being generated. The tool still seems very useful, though I was copy-pasting passages into a web translate tool one paragraph at a time, to get rough-translated text to start with. Working that way is fine. Hope this comment might be helpful. --Doncram (talk) 19:31, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FYI List of castles in South Tyrol has appearance of being a good list from some source, and includes many redlinks which probably could get articles. It's funny, I was primary author of an essay wp:ITSACASTLE, which has been pretty widely cited in AFDs (although often by alternate names such as wp:ITSAMUSEUM) and has helped win many "Keep" decisions, until now few if any castles are nominated for deletion. The essay itself was nominated for deletion by detractor of me, and the AFD earned a very solid "Keep" decision. --Doncram (talk) 03:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 16 on Bree, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bruxton (talk) 20:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, ABSA Centre, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 04:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Casa Ferrario, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Modussiccandi (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Modussiccandi (talk) 14:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:ABSA Centre. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 08:53, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Quadrant House, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Quadrant House, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MaxnaCarta (talk) 04:55, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ABSA Centre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Castle Devachan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently only has one.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:49, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Snia Viscosa Tower, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, and currently has zero (one is a simple mention, and one is not a reliable source). And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis. Thank you for your work on Snia Viscosa Tower. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Castle Devachan instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion.

If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Castle Devachan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:16 on Bree, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Casa Ferrario, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "16 on Bree".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Casa Ferrario".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 :-) Fram (talk) 15:08, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Fram:. No, I'm not talking about that, I'm talking about the old, historic name that appears on the balcony of the building in some sort of billboard sign. This picture features evidently new signs. Also, the "et" appears in the name of the hotel in the 1929 novel A Farewell To Arms by Hemingway, as well as in the names of other Italian hotels from the era: Grand Hotel et de Milan, Grand Hotel et des Palmes...--Plumbago Capensis (talk) 15:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, then it certainly isn't the current name of the hotel, as evidenced by that newer sign and their website. Anyway, the older name is a redirect to the current one, so people looking for that will find it as well. Fram (talk) 15:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kinda. it is the original name, and the name by which it is historically, internationally and literature-wise known.--Plumbago Capensis (talk) 15:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Grand Hotel des Iles Borromées, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:41, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plumbago Capensis. Thank you for your work on Gioia 20 Tower. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plumbago Capensis. Thank you for your work on Galleria De Bono. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating the page. Please note that translating from other Wikipedias without attribution is a violation of Wikipedia's license. Please look at Help:Translation to learn how to correctly provide attribution. Moreover, the page needs more reliable sources than the ones you used, it would be great if you could add some more!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 16:04, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plumbago Capensis. Thank you for your work on Truglia Tower. Another editor, Dcotos, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 13:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Plumbago Capensis,

Thank you for creating Lake Sabaudia.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Good start! You may improve categories. Cheers!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dcotos (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Camillo Olivetti Fountain. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 18:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ivrea Roman Amphitheatre. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Plumbago Capensis. Thank you for your work on Albiano d'Ivrea Castle. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start/ Need more sources. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:17, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]