| This is Thehwrproject's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Miller (nutritionist) (February 17)

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Excepting the SCMP piece, no significant coverage in reliable independent secondary sources. Condition Nutrition website is a primary source so is unreliable. The Bangkok Post links didn't work for me, and Companies House listing is not significant.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Miller (nutritionist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Thehwrproject!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Paul W (talk) 21:33, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
|
- Hi Paul, thanks for the suggestions. i have made the edits and resubmitted but I'm not sure if I did the resubmit correctly.Please let me know and if I need to do anything else Thehwrproject (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. It has been resubmitted (though the Bangkok Post links still appear to be broken). Please don't remove reviewer comments - they are a key part of the AfC process. Paul W (talk) 22:15, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies paul about the deletion hopefully it didn't happen this time. I have also checked the links to confirm they work and added more from PubMed to help with authority Thehwrproject (talk) 22:40, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi. It has been resubmitted (though the Bangkok Post links still appear to be broken). Please don't remove reviewer comments - they are a key part of the AfC process. Paul W (talk) 22:15, 17 February 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Miller (nutritionist) (March 2)

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Miller (nutritionist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi @AllWeKnowOfHeaven, I've updated the Peter Miller draft to address your feedback on source diversity (added a major 2025 Times of India feature) and fixed the broken links. I’ve resubmitted for review. Thanks! Thehwrproject (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Peter Miller (nutritionist) has a new comment

- Hi Paul, I’ve updated the Peter Miller draft. I replaced the glitchy links with verified ones, added a video profile from SCMP, and included direct quotes in the citations so they can be verified even if there are regional connection issues. Thanks, Thehwrproject Thehwrproject (talk) 21:32, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, Thehwrproject. It really is not helpful to delete comments left by reviewers. You have been previously warned about this, but you have chosen to ignore it, and it is disruptive and wasteful of reviewers' time. Paul W (talk) 21:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Miller (nutritionist) (March 2)

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Adding short extracts to the citations merely notes that Miller is mentioned. It remains impossible for reviewers in UK to ascertain if the coverage is significant (as required by WP:GNG and WP:BLP), and deleting my reviewer's comment about the HTTP Error 451 is unhelpful to other editors. Four citations sourced from one journalist is a bit dubious too.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Miller (nutritionist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Miller (nutritionist) (March 2)

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft still falls short. Ref 1, while apparently significant, is mainly an interview so may not be reliable (see WP:INT), and Ref 4 is a related video (for some reason, attributed to a different author). Refs 2 and 3 are works by Miller (so do not count towards the required significant coverage about Miller in reliable independent secondary sources). Ref 5 appears to be single mention (so not SIGCOV); Ref 6 cannot be verified from the UK but judging from the quote provided may also just be a single mention (not SIGCOV). I have reinstated the review comments previously deleted by the submitter; please do not remove them again.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Miller (nutritionist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

