Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Featured and good topics in Wikipedia

A featured topic (FT) is a collection of inter-related articles in which at least half are featured articles or featured lists. The remaining articles must be at least good quality.

A good topic (GT) is a collection of inter-related articles that are of a good quality (though are not necessarily featured articles) with a less stringent quality threshold than a featured topic.

This page is for the nomination of potential featured and good topics. See the featured and good topic criteria for criteria on both types of topic.

Before nominating a topic, nominators may wish to receive feedback by listing it at the Featured and good topics talk page. Nominators must be sufficiently familiar with the subject matter and sources to deal with objections during the FTC/GTC process. If you nominate something you have worked on, note it as a self-nomination. Nominators who are not significant contributors to the articles of the topic should consult regular editors of the articles prior to nomination. Nominators are expected to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly.

The featured and good topics coordinators Aza24, MaranoFan and Kyle Peake determine the timing of the process for each nomination. For a nomination to be promoted to FT or GT status, consensus must be reached for a group to be promoted to featured or good topic status. If enough time passes without objections being resolved, nominations will be removed from the candidates topic and archived.

To contact the FGTC coordinators, please leave a message on the FGTC talk page, or use the {{@FGTC}} notification template elsewhere.

You may want to check previous archived nominations first:

Purge the cache to refresh this page

Shortcuts

Featured content:

Good content:

Featured and good topic tools:

Nomination procedure

To create a new nomination use the form below (e.g., Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Saffron/archive1) and click the "Create new nomination" button.

Once the nomination page is created, remember to transclude it in the appropriate section below, to leave nomination templates on the talk pages of the articles nominated for the topic. For detailed instructions on how to nominate topics or add articles to existing topics, see Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/Nomination procedure.

Supporting and objecting

Please review all the articles of the nominated topic with the featured and good topic criteria in mind before deciding to support or oppose a nomination.

To edit nominations in order to comment on them, you must click the "edit" link to the right of the article nomination on which you wish to comment (not the overall page's "edit this page" link).
If you approve of a nomination, write '''Support''' followed by your reasons. Supports that clearly evaluate the criteria will be weighted more than those that do not.
If you oppose a nomination, write '''Oppose''' or '''Object''' followed by the reason for your objection. Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to fix the source of the objection, the objection may be ignored.
- To withdraw an objection, strike it out (with <s>...</s>) rather than removing it.

For a topic to be promoted to featured or good topic status, consensus must be reached that it meets the criteria. The FGTC coordinators are usually the ones to assess this consensus and close FGTC discussions. If there is a consensus to promote, the promote instructions are located here. If enough time passes without objections being resolved (at least one week), nominations will be removed from the candidates list and archived. Nominations will stay here for ten days if there is unanimous consent, or longer if warranted by debate.

Featured topic nominations

Tornado outbreak of May 4–6, 2007

The tornado outbreak of May 4–6, 2007 was a devastating tornado outbreak that took place in Kansas, resulting in the deaths of thirteen people. Twelve of these deaths alone came from the Greensburg tornado, a massive EF5 tornado and the first in the United States to be rated as such. The tornado leveled Greensburg, leaving 95% of the town damaged or destroyed.

Tornado outbreak of May 4–6, 2007

3 articles

Greensburg tornado

List of tornadoes

Contributor(s): User:EF5, User:CrazyC83, User:Cyclonebiskit

Pretty self-explanatory, is already listed at Wikipedia:Good topics/Tornado outbreak of May 4–6, 2007. Only three articles reasonably within the topic area. With the promotion of Greensburg tornado to FA, it now meets the FT threshold. --^EF⁵ 13:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support igordebraga ≠ 01:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Idiosincrático (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. 86 Wing RAAF

No. 86 Wing is a Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) transport and air-to-air refuelling wing. Coming under the control of Air Mobility Group RAAF, it is headquartered at RAAF Base Amberley in Queensland.

4 articles

Contributor(s): Matarisvan

Three out of four articles in the topic are featured articles, and the one remaining article is a good article, which meets the minimum criteria for a FTC. One article in the topic (No. 36 Squadron) is part of a good topic, the No. 91 (Composite) Wing RAAF, but the squadron has been part of the No. 86 Wing for most of its service years, and was part of the No. 91 Wing for only two years, so I don't think there should be any problems of overlap. If there are, I can remove the No. 36 Squadron article from this topic. I don't know if there is precedent for an article being part of two or more good/featured topics and what the required procedure would be, but I would like to know. --Matarisvan (talk) 11:46, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Idiosincrático (talk) 04:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The overlap seems entirely reasonable and indeed a nice feature, further linking readers between two sets of well-written, well-researched articles. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Prairie Grove

The Battle of Prairie Grove, also known as the Prairie Grove Campaign, was a battle of the American Civil War fought on December 7, 1862. While tactically indecisive, the battle secured Union control over Northwest Arkansas.

Battle of Prairie Grove

3 articles

Battle of Cane Hill

Van Buren raid

Contributor(s): Matarisvan

Two articles in the topic are featured articles, and the lead article is a GA, so I think the topic meet the FTC criteria. As veteran users like Hog Farm continue to work on American Civil War articles, I think there could be other featured topics like this one. Some potential ACW topics close to being FTCs are Camden's Expedition, Price's Missouri Raid, and the longshot Vicksburg campaign. --Matarisvan (talk) 12:23, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this topic include the Union and Confederate order of battle lists? Idiosincrático (talk) 04:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Idiosincrático, I also pondered this question, but decided not to include the ORBATs. I saw the only featured topic which had ORBATs, the Guadalcanal campaign, did not include the Battle of Guadalcanal order of battle in the topic list. However, warfare good topics do include ORBATs, so I'm not sure right now. Maybe the coordinators could help make a decision? Matarisvan (talk) 10:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As the primary author of the articles here, I would think the way to go would be either have a Battle of Prairie Grove topic with the two orders of battle or to expand Prairie Grove Campaign from a redirect, and then have the campaign lead with the three battles as the subarticles. Hog Farm _Talk 13:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@FGTC coordinators: Your opinion on the inclusion of the ORBATs? Matarisvan (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'd vote yes, including lists in these topics is best practice. K. Peake 15:00, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aza24 and @MaranoFan, your deciding opinion as the other two coordinators? If you think the ORBATs should be included, then I would have to withdraw this nomination. Matarisvan (talk) 11:50, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Matarisvan, both seem like fairly sensible inclusions, so I would weakly vote to include them. Neither seems particularly difficult to get to FL status, should you wish to do so; I see a good model at Battle of Droop Mountain order of battle. As a side note, coordinators do not have any more say in content matters like these than other editors; our coordinator role comes into place merely when evaluating consensus, and for general procedural/administrative tasks. – Aza24 (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Aza24, @Hog Farm, @Idiosincrático and @Kyle Peake, many thanks for your very helpful comments. I would like to withdraw this nomination because the ORBATs will have to be included. Matarisvan (talk) 23:33, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good topic nominations

South India

South India, also known as Southern India or Peninsular India, is the southern part of the Deccan Peninsula in India encompassing the states of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Telangana as well as the union territories of Lakshadweep and Puducherry, occupying 19.31% of India's area (635,780 km² or 245,480 sq mi) and 20% of India's population. South India has the largest combined largest gross domestic product compared to other regions in India.

South India

8 articles

A significant geographic and economic region of India, where 4 of the 5 largest cities (1 FA, 3 GA), in addition to 3 states and 1 Union territory (all GAs) can be listed. This is a Good Topic nomination. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:34, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is an impressive body of work, but I don't see how it meets the "There are no obvious gaps" criteria. It could possibly be made with all states and territories, and then perhaps all capitals, but not a mixture of both. CMD (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – This is a cherry-pick of all the recognized articles in what is a pretty vague topic, failing criteria 1.d. It's missing key states and territories like Puducherry, Telangana and Karnataka, as well as countless cities. In my opinion, the inclusion criteria of the topic should be more specific; i.e. States and Union territories of South India; but even so, it would still require much more work. Idiosincrático (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Chipmunkdavis @Idiosincrático Would you both be better convinced if I made it only the 4 cities listed? Apologies if this does not work, this is my first Good Topic nom so I'm still trying to understand the criteria and how it works. :)~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 12:32, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The criteria to focus on are "The articles or lists have a clear similarity with each other under a well-defined topical scope"/"All articles or lists in the topic are linked together, preferably using a template, and share a common category or super-category" (those two work somewhat as a pair) and "There are no obvious gaps (missing or low-quality articles) in the topic. A topic must not cherry-pick only the best articles to become featured together". In short, the overall topic needs to be something that can be clearly broken down into a complete list of subtopics, and all those subtopics must be present. "South India" is a very broad topic, reading about four cities would probably not cover the reading needed to understand the whole region. CMD (talk) 14:22, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both of you for the comments and feedback. I wish to withdraw this nomination after a misunderstanding of the criteria and how this topic at the moment is not suitable for inclusion here. Sincere apologies for this. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:24, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blackout (Britney Spears album)

Blackout is the fifth studio album by American singer Britney Spears. It was released on October 25, 2007, by Jive Records. Its production and release occurred as Spears' personal struggles were highly publicized and overshadowed her professional projects. She executive-produced the album, working with producers Danja, Bloodshy & Avant, Sean Garrett, and the Neptunes, among others; it is the only album on which Spears is credited as the executive producer. The final result was primarily a dance-pop and electropop record with R&B, Euro disco and dubstep influences, with lyrical themes revolving around love, fame, media scrutiny, sex, and clubbing.

Blackout

6 articles

"Gimme More"

"Piece of Me"

"Break the Ice"

"Radar"

Contributor(s): Xwomanizerx

This was demoted last year due to the creation of an article for the song "Everybody"... that has since been turned into a redirect to the album. With no gaps, restoring this to Good Topic shouldn't be an issue. igordebraga ≠ 02:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC) --igordebraga ≠ 02:12, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support – It's Britney beach Idiosincrático (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna videography

American singer Madonna has released 83 music videos, eleven concert tour videos, two documentary videos, four music video compilations, two music video box sets, four promotional videos, and four video singles. Nicknamed as the "Queen of Videos" or "Queen of MTV", her music videos were often considered by critics as works of art, depicting various social issues. Her early videos also received a significant academic attention.

Madonna videography

9 articles

Madonna Live: The Virgin Tour

Ciao Italia: Live from Italy

The Immaculate Collection

Blond Ambition World Tour Live

The Girlie Show: Live Down Under

The Video Collection 93:99

Drowned World Tour 2001

Celebration: The Video Collection

Contributor(s): 11JORN, IndianBio, Legolas2186, Chrishm21

One more from the extensive work of WP:MADONNA. This only counts the music video compilations and concert tour videos without an attached album (if you think those are necessary, all four - The Confessions Tour, Sticky & Sweet Tour, MDNA World Tour, Rebel Heart Tour - are already GAs and could be included), leaving the documentaries for a planned one regarding her filmography. igordebraga ≠ 01:06, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support – I would elect to put all of the videography in this topic, even if they are in other topics (they can overlap). Idiosincrático (talk) 20:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious Billboard Hot 100 entries

The Victorious cast, an American group formed for the Nickelodeon television series, released nine singles, with three of them charting on the US Billboard Hot 100: "Freak the Freak Out", "Beggin' on Your Knees", and "Best Friend's Brother"

Victorious Billboard Hot 100 entries

4 articles

"Freak the Freak Out"

"Beggin' on Your Knees"

"Best Friend's Brother"

Contributor(s): Shoot for the Stars

This includes all the singles from the American show Victorious that charted on the US Billboard Hot 100. I believe it meets the requirements because all of the singles that charted are at GA status, and the discography is at FL. --Shoot for the Stars (talk) 20:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support The songs have a connection and are covered by the table on the show at the bottom, better recognize your good work. igordebraga ≠ 00:49, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black Country, New Road studio albums

4 articles

For the First Time

Ants from Up There

Forever Howlong

Contributor(s): Cathodography, Rambley

All three studio album articles have now been brought to good article status with the goal of forming a good topic. I had planned to submit the nomination when Forever Howlong was promoted to GA about 15 days ago but didn't get around to it until now. --Cattos ^💭 03:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Idiosincrático (talk) 04:54, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Medxvo (talk) 16:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1969 World Snooker Championship

The 1969 World Snooker Championship was a professional snooker tournament held from 18 November 1968 to 22 March 1969. It was the first World Snooker Championship in a knock-out format since 1957, following a series of challenge matches from 1964 to 1968. John Spencer won the title, defeating Gary Owen by achieving a winning margin at 37 frames to 24 in the final.

1969 World Snooker Championship

9 articles

Bernard Bennett

Fred Davis (snooker player)

Gary Owen (snooker player)

John Pulman

Jackie Rea

Ray Reardon

John Spencer (snooker player)

Rex Williams

Contributor(s): BennyOnTheLoose, Rodney Baggins, Lee Vilenski

The main tournament article and the articles for all participating players are at GA or FA level. --BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Alavense (talk) 14:11, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
contributer support. Amazing that's all the players for this event. The only other person who might be suitable to add in is the referee, but I'm not sure they are notable Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:59, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support Idiosincrático (talk) 04:56, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cos ^{(X + Z)} 17:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Topic removal candidates

Game of Thrones season 1

Game of Thrones season 1

12 articles

"Winter Is Coming"

"The Kingsroad"

"Lord Snow"

"Cripples, Bastards, and Broken Things"

"The Wolf and the Lion"

"Baelor"

Game of Thrones: Season 1 (soundtrack)

Game of Thrones season 1 was delisted from Featured list status on August 3. Retention period expired November 3. JHD0919 (talk) 16:31, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious 2.0: More Music from the Hit TV Show

Victorious 2.0: More Music from the Hit TV Show

4 articles

"Take a Hint"

"Make It in America"

"I Think You're Swell"

Unfortunately, I notified this three months ago. Don't You (Forget About Me) is missing as it is part of the songs recorded for the album. "Don't You (Forget About Me)" is currently a C-class article, but no one is working on it. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:21, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:You should have notified me about this, but you didn't. If you read the supports, people say it was not necessary to make the covers GA. There are so many covers from those songs that the Victorious one isn't even notable. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 18:41, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did it here: Wikipedia talk:Featured topics/Victorious 2.0: More Music from the Hit TV Show, the right place to discuss the topic. If the supporters showed an empathic support, it is up to them, but we have had several albums that have not been promoted to GT or being demoted from GT due to them lack of all blue-link related articles. In fact, in the nomination, only one person mentioned it: "Support While the cover song could be added, better just recognize what's done already", deliberately going against the purpose of good topics. Victorious shouldn't be an exception for the rules set. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:13, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought it made sense only putting the songs made for the show. Besides, the one other blue link on the track list that you highlighted doesn't even mention Victorious in the article. igordebraga ≠ 19:01, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The song is a cover of the Simple Minds original, it doesn't have its own article. The song's article doesn't have anything remotely related to the topic, the Victorious show/album isn't even mentioned in the article. Thus it's inclusion in the topic would be out of place. I reference the Taylor's version topics, which despite the album having covers of her originally published songs, are not included in the topic as they don't have their own articles. There's a similar case with the Chemical Romance album topic, it doesn't include a cover of the brief Romance guitar piece for the same reasons. Idiosincrático (talk) 00:42, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are saying too many things at the same time. First, cover versions don't requiere their own articles, so I don't get the point. Not every cover becomes as relevant as the original song to have an independent article. But in itself, it is not a reason not to mention the versión in the original song. The article not discussing the song is not a reason not to discuss the song? I found sources discussing it (this also applies to Vol. 1 since you pointing that discussion here instead of discussing it there individually), so I don't see why the article cannot discuss it. The Taylor's Versions are irrelevant here. The TV albums are reworks of the original album. Taylor Swift is covering her own albums, so it is a new product. Thus, those re-releases are new topics that, at the time, didn't mean to be part of the original idea. You would have a point with Romance if Islands (The xx song) and Love Don't Live Here Anymore weren't part of other topics. What seams to be happening is that it exists a generalized idea that since "X" is a cover version that wasn't as important as the original version, and "X" is one of many other versions recorded by others, then nominators don't want to included those songs accordingly on the topic, despite (in the case of albums) they were meant to be part of the final product and were most likely promoted by the artist. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 01:46, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Islands has a section about Shakira's cover, ditto Love Don't Live Here Anymore for Madonna's. As one enters the song article from the album topic, it's clear why it's there. The Simple Minds one doesn't even mention Victorious. It's on a whole different level of importance/relevance, and thus it doesn't seem essential. igordebraga ≠ 14:11, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Victorious: Music from the Hit TV Show

Victorious: Music from the Hit TV Show

11 articles

"Make It Shine"

"Freak the Freak Out"

"Best Friend's Brother"

"Beggin' on Your Knees"

"All I Want Is Everything"

"You're the Reason"

"Give It Up"

"Song 2 You"

"Finally Falling"

"Leave It All to Shine"

Unfortunately, I notified this three months ago. I Want You Back is missing as it is part of the songs recorded for the album. "I Want You Back" is currently a start-class article (C-ish in my opinion), but no one is working on it. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 03:13, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I would have appreciated it if you had notified me about this, but you didn't. If you read the supports, people say it was not necessary to make the covers GA. There are so many covers from those songs that the Victorious one isn't even notable. Shoot for the Stars (talk) 18:39, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I notified it at the topic's page, the venue where such discussions take place. Reviewing the nomination, no one mentioned the cover, indicating it was completely overshadowed, not discussed. You are also confusing WP:NOTABILITY with WP:NOTEWORTHYness, since I_Want_You_Back#Victorious_version does exist and shows how notable/noteworthy the cover was. Just to cite an example of many delisted/not promoted album good topics, refer to Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Celebration (Madonna album)/archive1. Celebration (Madonna album) has 4 specific topics relating to it: the album, two new songs and a video album. But the album is comprised of 32 other songs that were not created for the album. If you'd like an example of a topic including a cover version, Wikipedia:Good topics/Sale el Sol shows it with Islands. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 21:35, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: See Victorious 2.0: More Music from the Hit TV Show case. Idiosincrático (talk) 00:44, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Idiosincrático: You are contradicting here what you say there. Tbhotch^™ (CC BY-SA 4.0) 01:27, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

30 Rock season 3

30 Rock season 3

23 articles

"Do-Over"

"Believe in the Stars"

"The One with the Cast of Night Court"

"Gavin Volure"

"Reunion"

"Christmas Special"

"Señor Macho Solo"

"Flu Shot"

"Retreat to Move Forward"

"Generalissimo"

"St. Valentine's Day"

"Larry King"

"The Bubble"

"Cutbacks"

"The Ones"

"Mamma Mia"

"Kidney Now!"

With the demotion of 30 Rock season 3, this no longer meets the good topic criteria. No recent efforts to improve the article or nominate it for a status promotion. Retention period expired September 1, 2025. Z1720 (talk) 20:55, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Idiosincrático (talk) 04:07, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wait, pending GA nom. Idiosincrático (talk) 05:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Idiosincrático (talk) 20:12, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~Remove~~ per nom. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 09:09, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pause? I've actually given the article a once-over and will nominate it for GA, if some time could be allowed for that process to go forward. (I will officially nominate in a day or two after the main article edior, whom I pinged, has had a chance to answer whether they'd prefer to nominate it themselves.) ~ L 🌸 (talk) 03:41, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@LEvalyn, thank you! We are happy to hold this for a bit, and I see the GA review is underway. Feel free to report back here on its result. Aza24 (talk) 02:17, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The GA review has just concluded as a "pass" so I believe there's no longer any need to delist this topic. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, pinging Z1720 as nominator as well. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 18:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep @LEvalyn: Thanks for the ping. I see that season 3 is now a GA so this now meets the 3b criteria. Z1720 (talk) 18:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if it was re-promoted, no need to demote. igordebraga ≠ 01:08, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Repromoted and none of the other articles are noticed for GAR, afaik. Z1720 (talk) 01:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Glad to see this has been saved from demotion! Crystal Drawers (talk) 00:45, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest

San Marino debuted at the Eurovision Song Contest in 2008 and has since then participated 14 times, only missing the 2009 and 2010 contests. During this time period, they have placed last and qualified for the grand final three times.

San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest

16 articles

With the conclusion of the 2025 edition, San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 should be added to the topic, and needs to be updated to GA status. Currently there is no active ongoing effort to improve the article and the retention period expired August 17, 2025. Z1720 (talk) 20:47, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove Idiosincrático (talk) 04:07, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know Grk1011, who has been the driving force behind getting these articles to GA status, is very keen to improve the outstanding article, and it's not always easy to get the time to contribute to Wikipedia. While the retention period has expired, I don't believe it's accurate to say that there is no effort to improve the article, since Grk1011 has added to the article within the last month (see article history), and given there is a considerable GA backlog anyway I think it's only fair to give him a bit of leeway to get this article over the line in the next couple of weeks. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 22:09, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Sims2aholic8: I've certainly put forth an ongoing effort to get it ready for GA, but I also understand that perhaps different editors have different meanings for "ongoing". I only have time to do substantive edits every few weeks. Grk1011 (talk) 13:14, 24 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  Coordinator comment: @Grk1011, we're certainly not against holding nominations so folks have time to improve articles. Could you commit to a GA nomination sometime in October? Aza24 (talk) 22:33, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Grk1011 I have been monitoring this one, do you have any commitment or not please do it cannot be assessed whether this topic could be kept? --K. Peake 17:03, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I can work to get it nominated this month! Thanks for the patience. Grk1011 (talk) 23:04, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Remove One month has passed since the above comment about nominating the article, but that still didn’t happen. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:10, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:

Wikipedia featured and good topics

Hidden category:

Non-talk pages with subpages that are automatically signed