Epstein Files Full PDF

CLICK HERE
Technopedia Center
PMB University Brochure
Faculty of Engineering and Computer Science
S1 Informatics S1 Information Systems S1 Information Technology S1 Computer Engineering S1 Electrical Engineering S1 Civil Engineering

faculty of Economics and Business
S1 Management S1 Accountancy

Faculty of Letters and Educational Sciences
S1 English literature S1 English language education S1 Mathematics education S1 Sports Education
teknopedia

  • Registerasi
  • Brosur UTI
  • Kip Scholarship Information
  • Performance
Flag Counter
  1. World Encyclopedia
  2. LIGO - Wikipedia
LIGO - Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Gravitational wave observatory site
This article is about LIGO observatories. For other uses, see LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Ligo (disambiguation).

Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory
The LIGO Livingston control room as it was during Advanced LIGO's first observing run (O1)
Alternative namesLIGO Edit this at Wikidata
Location(s)Hanford Site, Washington, and Livingston, Louisiana, US
CoordinatesLIGO Hanford Observatory: 46°27′19″N 119°24′28″W / 46.45528°N 119.40778°W / 46.45528; -119.40778 (LIGO Hanford Observatory)
LIGO Livingston Observatory: 30°33′47″N 90°46′28″W / 30.56306°N 90.77444°W / 30.56306; -90.77444 (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
Wavelength43 km (7.0 kHz)–10,000 km (30 Hz)
Length4,000 m (13,123 ft 4 in) Edit this at Wikidata
Websitewww.ligo.caltech.edu Edit this at Wikidata
LIGO is located in the United States
LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Hanford Observatory
LIGO Hanford Observatory
LIGO observatories in the Contiguous United States
  Related media on Commons
[edit on Wikidata]

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) is a large-scale physics experiment and observatory designed to detect cosmic gravitational waves and to develop gravitational-wave observations as an astronomical tool.[1] Prior to LIGO, all data about the universe has come in the form of light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, from limited direct exploration on relatively nearby Solar System objects such as the Moon, Mars, Venus, Jupiter and their moons, asteroids etc, and from high energy cosmic particles. Initially, two large observatories were built in the United States with the aim of detecting gravitational waves by laser interferometry. Two additional, smaller gravitational wave observatories are now operational in Japan (KAGRA) and Italy (Virgo). The two LIGO observatories use mirrors spaced 4 kilometres (13,000 ft) apart to measure changes in length—over an effective span of 1,120 kilometres (700 mi)—of less than one ten-thousandth the charge diameter of a proton.[2]

The initial LIGO observatories were funded by the United States National Science Foundation (NSF). They were conceived, built, and are operated by Caltech and MIT.[3][4] They collected data from 2002 to 2010, but no gravitational waves were detected during that period.

The Advanced LIGO Project to enhance the original LIGO detectors began in 2008, and continues to be supported by the NSF, with important contributions from the United Kingdom's Science and Technology Facilities Council, the Max Planck Society of Germany, and the Australian Research Council.[5][6] The improved detectors began operation in 2015. The detection of gravitational waves was reported in 2016 by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) and the Virgo Collaboration with the international participation of scientists from several universities and research institutions. Scientists involved in the project and the analysis of the data for gravitational-wave astronomy are organized by the LSC, which includes more than 1,000 scientists worldwide,[7][8][9] as well as 440,000 active Einstein@Home users as of December 2016[update].[10]

LIGO is the largest and most ambitious project ever funded by the NSF.[11][12] In 2017, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Rainer Weiss, Kip Thorne and Barry Barish "for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of gravitational waves".[13]

Observations are made in "runs". As of February 2026[update], LIGO has made four runs (with the third run divided into two "subruns" and the fourth divided into three subruns), and made 391 detections of gravitational waves.[14][15] Maintenance and upgrades of the detectors are made between runs. The first run, O1, which ran from September 12, 2015, to January 19, 2016, made the first three detections, all black hole mergers. The second run, O2, which ran from November 30, 2016, to August 25, 2017, made eight detections: seven black hole mergers and the first neutron star merger.[16] The third run, O3, began on April 1, 2019; it was divided into O3a, from April 1 to September 30, 2019, and O3b, from November 1, 2019[17] until it was suspended on March 27, 2020, due to COVID-19.[18] The O3 run included the first detection of the merger of a neutron star with a black hole.[15] The fourth run, O4, began on May 24, 2023, and ended on November 18, 2025. 250 detection "candidates" were observed during O4, with 77 confirmed observations and the remaining 173 pending final analysis as of February 2026 [19].

Subsequent gravitational wave observatories Virgo in Italy, and KAGRA in Japan, which both use interferometer arms 3 kilometres (9,800 ft) long, coordinated with LIGO to continue observations after the COVID-caused stop, and LIGO's O4 observing run started on May 24, 2023.[20][21] LIGO projects a sensitivity goal of 160–190 Mpc for binary neutron star mergers (sensitivities: Virgo 80–115 Mpc, KAGRA greater than 1 Mpc).[22]

History

[edit]

Background

[edit]
LIGO Hanford Observatory
LIGO Louisiana Observatory

The LIGO concept built upon early work by many scientists to test a component of Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity, the existence of gravitational waves. Starting in the 1960s, American scientists including Joseph Weber, as well as Soviet scientists Mikhail Gertsenshtein and Vladislav Pustovoit, conceived of basic ideas and prototypes of laser interferometry,[23][24] and in 1967 Rainer Weiss of MIT published an analysis of interferometer use and initiated the construction of a prototype with military funding, but it was terminated before it could become operational.[25] Starting in 1968, Kip Thorne initiated theoretical efforts on gravitational waves and their sources at Caltech, and was convinced that gravitational wave detection would eventually succeed.[23]

Prototype interferometric gravitational wave detectors (interferometers) were built in the late 1960s by Robert L. Forward and colleagues at Hughes Research Laboratories (with mirrors mounted on a vibration isolated plate rather than free swinging), and in the 1970s (with free swinging mirrors between which light bounced many times) by Weiss at MIT, and then by Heinz Billing and colleagues in Garching Germany, and then by Ronald Drever, James Hough and colleagues in Glasgow, Scotland.[26]

In 1980, the NSF funded the study of a large interferometer led by MIT (Paul Linsay, Peter Saulson, Rainer Weiss), and the following year, Caltech constructed a 40-meter prototype (Ronald Drever and Stan Whitcomb). The MIT study established the feasibility of interferometers at a 1 km scale with adequate sensitivity.[23][27]

Under pressure from the NSF, MIT and Caltech were asked to join forces to lead a LIGO project based on the MIT study and on experimental work at Caltech, MIT, Glasgow, and Garching. Drever, Thorne, and Weiss formed a LIGO steering committee, though they were turned down for funding in 1984 and 1985. By 1986, they were asked to disband the steering committee and a single director, Rochus E. Vogt (Caltech), was appointed. In 1988, a research and development proposal achieved funding.[23][27][28][29][30][31]

From 1989 through 1994, LIGO failed to progress technically and organizationally. Only political efforts continued to acquire funding.[23][32] Ongoing funding was routinely rejected until 1991, when the U.S. Congress agreed to fund LIGO for the first year for $23 million. However, requirements for receiving the funding were not met or approved, and the NSF questioned the technological and organizational basis of the project.[28][29] By 1992, LIGO was restructured with Drever no longer a direct participant.[23][32][33][34] Ongoing project management issues and technical concerns were revealed in NSF reviews of the project, resulting in the withholding of funds until they formally froze spending in 1993.[23][32][35][36]

In 1994, after consultation between relevant NSF personnel, LIGO's scientific leaders, and the presidents of MIT and Caltech, Vogt stepped down and Barry Barish (Caltech) was appointed laboratory director,[23][33][37] and the NSF made clear that LIGO had one last chance for support.[32] Barish's team created a new study, budget, and project plan with a budget exceeding the previous proposals by 40%. Barish proposed to the NSF and National Science Board to build LIGO as an evolutionary detector, where detection of gravitational waves with initial LIGO would be possible, and with advanced LIGO would be probable.[38] This new proposal received NSF funding, Barish was appointed Principal Investigator, and the increase was approved. In 1994, with a budget of US$395 million, LIGO stood as the largest overall funded NSF project in history. The project broke ground in Hanford, Washington in late 1994 and in Livingston, Louisiana in 1995. As construction neared completion in 1997, under Barish's leadership two organizational institutions were formed, LIGO Laboratory and LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The LIGO laboratory consists of the facilities supported by the NSF under LIGO Operation and Advanced R&D; this includes administration of the LIGO detector and test facilities. The LIGO Scientific Collaboration is a forum for organizing technical and scientific research in LIGO. It is a separate organization from LIGO Laboratory with its own oversight. Barish appointed Weiss as the first spokesperson for this scientific collaboration.[23][28]

Observations begin

[edit]

Initial LIGO operations between 2002 and 2010 did not detect any gravitational waves. In 2004, under Barish, the funding and groundwork were laid for the next phase of LIGO development (called "Enhanced LIGO"). This was followed by a multi-year shut-down while the detectors were replaced by much improved "Advanced LIGO" versions.[39][40] Much of the research and development work for the LIGO/aLIGO machines was based on pioneering work for the GEO600 detector at Hannover, Germany.[41][42] By February 2015, the detectors were brought into engineering mode in both locations.[43]

In mid-September 2015, "the world's largest gravitational-wave facility" completed a five-year US$200-million overhaul, bringing the total cost to $620 million.[9][44] On September 18, 2015, Advanced LIGO began its first formal science observations at about four times the sensitivity of the initial LIGO interferometers.[45] Its sensitivity was to be further enhanced until it was planned to reach design sensitivity around 2021.[update][46][needs update]

Detections

[edit]

On February 11, 2016, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration published a paper about the detection of gravitational waves, from a signal detected at 09.51 UTC on September 14, 2015, of two ~30 solar mass black holes merging about 1.3 billion light-years from Earth.[47][48]

Executive director David Reitze announced the findings at a media event in Washington D.C., while executive director emeritus Barry Barish presented the first scientific paper of the findings at CERN to the physics community.[49]

On May 2, 2016, members of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and other contributors were awarded a Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics for contributing to the direct detection of gravitational waves.[50]

On June 16, 2016, LIGO announced a second signal was detected from the merging of two black holes with 14.2 and 7.5 times the mass of the Sun. The signal was picked up on December 26, 2015, at 3:38 UTC.[51]

The detection of a third black hole merger, between objects of 31.2 and 19.4 solar masses, occurred on January 4, 2017, and was announced on June 1, 2017.[52][53] Laura Cadonati was appointed the first deputy spokesperson.[54]

A fourth detection of a black hole merger, between objects of 30.5 and 25.3 solar masses, was observed on August 14, 2017, and was announced on September 27, 2017.[55]

In 2017, Weiss, Barish, and Thorne received the Nobel Prize in Physics "for decisive contributions to the LIGO detector and the observation of gravitational waves". Weiss was awarded one-half of the total prize money, and Barish and Thorne each received a one-quarter prize.[56][57][58]

After shutting down for improvements, LIGO resumed operation on March 26, 2019, with Virgo joining the network of gravitational-wave detectors on April 1, 2019.[59] Both ran until March 27, 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic halted operations.[18] During the COVID shutdown, LIGO underwent a further upgrade in sensitivity, and observing run O4 with the new sensitivity began on May 24, 2023.[20]

Mission

[edit]
Detector noise curves for Initial and Advanced LIGO as a function of frequency. They lie above the bands for space-borne detectors like the evolved Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (eLISA) and pulsar timing arrays such as the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA). The characteristic strains of potential astrophysical sources are also shown. To be detectable the characteristic strain of a signal must be above the noise curve.[60] These frequencies that aLIGO can detect are in the range of human hearing.

LIGO's mission is to directly observe gravitational waves of cosmic origin. These waves were first predicted by Einstein's general theory of relativity in 1916, when the technology necessary for their detection did not yet exist. Their existence was indirectly confirmed in 1974, when observations of the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16 showed an orbital decay which matched Einstein's predictions of energy loss by gravitational radiation. The Nobel Prize in Physics 1993 was awarded to Hulse and Taylor for this discovery.[61]

Direct detection of gravitational waves had long been sought. Their discovery has launched a new branch of astronomy to complement electromagnetic telescopes and neutrino observatories. Joseph Weber pioneered the effort to detect gravitational waves in the 1960s through his work on resonant mass bar detectors. Bar detectors continue to be used at six sites worldwide. By the 1970s, scientists including Rainer Weiss realized the applicability of laser interferometry to gravitational wave measurements. Robert Forward operated an interferometric detector at Hughes in the early 1970s.[62]

In fact as early as the 1960s, and perhaps before that, there were papers published on wave resonance of light and gravitational waves.[63] Work was published in 1971 on methods to exploit this resonance for the detection of high-frequency gravitational waves. In 1962, M. E. Gertsenshtein and V. I. Pustovoit published the very first paper describing the principles for using interferometers for the detection of very long wavelength gravitational waves.[64] The authors argued that by using interferometers the sensitivity can be 107 to 1010 times better than by using electromechanical experiments. Later, in 1965, Braginsky extensively discussed gravitational-wave sources and their possible detection. He pointed out the 1962 paper and mentioned the possibility of detecting gravitational waves if the interferometric technology and measuring techniques improved.

Since the early 1990s, physicists have thought that technology has evolved to the point where detection of gravitational waves—of significant astrophysical interest—is now possible.[65]

In August 2002, LIGO began its search for cosmic gravitational waves. Measurable emissions of gravitational waves are expected from binary systems (collisions and coalescences of neutron stars or black holes), supernova explosions of massive stars (which form neutron stars and black holes), accreting neutron stars, rotations of neutron stars with deformed crusts, and the remnants of gravitational radiation created by the birth of the universe. The observatory may, in theory, also observe more exotic hypothetical phenomena, such as gravitational waves caused by oscillating cosmic strings or colliding domain walls.

Observatories

[edit]

LIGO operates two gravitational wave observatories in unison: the LIGO Livingston Observatory (30°33′47″N 90°46′28″W / 30.56306°N 90.77444°W / 30.56306; -90.77444) in Livingston, Louisiana, and the LIGO Hanford Observatory, on the DOE Hanford Site (46°27′19″N 119°24′28″W / 46.45528°N 119.40778°W / 46.45528; -119.40778), located near Richland, Washington. These sites are separated by 3002 km straight line distance through the earth, but 3030 km over the surface. Since gravitational waves are expected to travel at the speed of light, this distance corresponds to a difference in gravitational wave arrival times of up to ten milliseconds. With the difference in arrival times at three different facilities one can trilaterate the source of the wave. This is done by adding a third instrument like Virgo, located at an even greater distance, in Europe.[66]

Each observatory supports an L-shaped ultra high vacuum system, measuring 4 km on each side. Up to five interferometers can be set up in each vacuum system.

The LIGO Livingston Observatory houses one laser interferometer in the primary configuration. This interferometer was successfully upgraded in 2004 with an active vibration isolation system based on hydraulic actuators providing a factor of 10 isolation in the 0.1–5 Hz band. Seismic vibration in this band is chiefly due to microseismic waves and anthropogenic sources (traffic, logging, etc.).

The LIGO Hanford Observatory houses one interferometer, almost identical to the one at the Livingston Observatory. During the Initial and Enhanced LIGO phases, a half-length interferometer operated in parallel with the main interferometer. For this 2 km interferometer, the Fabry–Pérot arm cavities had the same optical finesse, and, thus, half the storage time as the 4 km interferometers. With half the storage time, the theoretical strain sensitivity was as good as the full length interferometers above 200 Hz but only half as good at low frequencies. During the same era, Hanford retained its original passive seismic isolation system due to limited geologic activity in Southeastern Washington.

Operation

[edit]
Simplified operation of a gravitational wave observatory
Figure 1: A beamsplitter (green line) splits coherent light (from the white box) into two beams which reflect off the mirrors (cyan oblongs); only one outgoing and reflected beam in each arm is shown, and separated for clarity. The reflected beams recombine and an interference pattern is detected (purple circle).
Figure 2: A gravitational wave passing over the left arm (yellow) changes its length and thus the interference pattern.

The parameters in this section refer to the Advanced LIGO experiment. The primary interferometer consists of two beam lines of 4 km length which form a power-recycled Michelson interferometer with Gires–Tournois etalon arms. A pre-stabilized 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser emits a beam with a power of 20 W that passes through a power recycling mirror. The mirror fully transmits light incident from the laser and reflects light from the other side increasing the power of the light field between the mirror and the subsequent beam splitter to 700 W. From the beam splitter the light travels along two orthogonal arms. By the use of partially reflecting mirrors, Fabry–Pérot cavities are created in both arms that increase the effective path length of laser light in the arm from 4 km to approximately 1200 km.[67] The power of the light field in the cavity is 100 kW.[68]

When a gravitational wave passes through the interferometer, the spacetime in the local area is altered. Depending on the source of the wave and its polarization, this results in an effective change in length of one or both of the cavities. The effective length change between the beams will cause the light currently in the cavity to become very slightly out of phase (antiphase) with the incoming light. The cavity will therefore periodically get very slightly out of coherence and the beams, which are tuned to destructively interfere at the detector, will have a very slight periodically varying detuning. This results in a measurable signal.[69]

After an equivalent of approximately 280 trips down the 4 km length to the far mirrors and back again,[70] the two separate beams leave the arms and recombine at the beam splitter. The beams returning from two arms are kept out of phase so that when the arms are both in coherence and interference (as when there is no gravitational wave passing through), their light waves subtract, and no light should arrive at the photodiode. When a gravitational wave passes through the interferometer, the distances along the arms of the interferometer are shortened and lengthened, causing the beams to become slightly less out of phase. This results in the beams coming in phase, creating a resonance, hence some light arrives at the photodiode and indicates a signal. Light that does not contain a signal is returned to the interferometer using a power recycling mirror, thus increasing the power of the light in the arms.

Noise

[edit]

Since the signal being measured is so small, the LIGO project has carefully measured, documented, and eliminated many forms of noise. Mechanical/seismic noise sources can move objects in the optical system, such as the mirrors, the photon injectors, etc. Electric and magnetic noise can vibrate the permanent magnets and electronics, and radio waves can couple to electronics in the interferometer controls. These noises may drown out the real signal, or produce spurious signals. Background noise and unknown errors (which happen daily) are in the order of 10−20, while gravitational wave signals are around 10−22. After noise reduction, a signal-to-noise ratio around 20 can be achieved, or higher when combined with other gravitational wave detectors around the world.[71]

Much complexity in the instrument is in reducing these spurious couplings, and in monitoring the environment to detect previously unknown sources of noise in order to mitigate them or estimate their impact on the gravitational wave data[72]. Other than careful insulation of the equipment, the methods of mitigation also include:

  • If the noise source is produced by nearby human activity, then the human activity can be adjusted or relocated. For example, the main road near the LHO site was repaved to reduce vibrations caused by trucks.[73]
  • If the noise source is predictable, then the equipment can adjust directly to cancel out the noise source. This is true for Earth tides.
  • If the noise source is not predictable, but measurable, and its effect on the equipment is known, then the noise can be recorded and subtracted from the signal afterwards. This is true for seismic activities.

Seismic vibration is a major source of noise, mitigated by seismic insulation, as well as by sensitive recording of seismic activity in the vicinity of the site, which allows the effect of seismic activity to be subtracted away from the signal. Earth tides produce significant but highly predictable stretching of the equipment, which is cancelled out by a system which adjusts the position of the chambers or the laser frequency, based on the predicted stretching. There are also many "microseismic" sources that produce ground vibrations, including ocean storms, dam operations, forest logging, trucks driving on a road 2 km away, walking heavily in a control room, etc. When under a strong wind, the walls of the building can tilt, which deforms the floor within 10 m of the walls, creating "tilt noise". Even the thermal expansion and contraction of the building itself creates creaks and thumps. Similarly, acoustic vibrations can shake the equipment. This includes wind, nearby vehicles, propeller aircraft, HVAC of a building 300 m away, cooling fans, etc.[73][74][75][76] Other sources of noise include a case of ravens pecking on frost-covered pipes connected to a LN2 cryopump on hot days.[77] Some noises are transient with no identifiable cause.[78]

Electromagnetic noise can couple with electronic and magnetic equipment. Such examples include building heaters, large motors, lights or relatively near-by high-voltage power lines up to 4 km away from the site.[73] Since Barkhausen noise is suspected to be relevant, magnets at noise-critical locations of aLIGO are made of samarium cobalt, which has lower Barkhausen noise.[79]

Because gravity cannot be shielded, the motion of massive objects can create varying gravitational attraction on the test masses in LIGO, called gravity gradient noise or Newtonian noise. This can be caused by air and soil density variation. Even the gravitational effect of a single human walking within 5 m of the mirror already approaches the noise floor, and the LIGO corner building was designed to keep people at least 10 m from all test masses during normal operations.[80] Cosmic ray events may also create noise in the detector.[76]

Observations

[edit]
Western leg of LIGO interferometer on Hanford Reservation
See also: First observation of gravitational waves and List of gravitational wave observations

Based on current models of astronomical events, and the predictions of the general theory of relativity,[81][82][83] gravitational waves that originate tens of millions of light years from Earth are expected to distort the 4 km mirror spacing by about 10−18 m, less than one-thousandth the charge diameter of a proton. Equivalently, this is a relative change in distance of approximately 10−21. A typical event which might cause a detection event would be the late stage inspiral and merger of two 10-solar-mass black holes, not necessarily located in the Milky Way galaxy, which is expected to result in a very specific sequence of signals often summarized by the slogan chirp, burst, quasi-normal mode ringing, exponential decay.

In their fourth Science Run at the end of 2004, the LIGO detectors demonstrated sensitivities in measuring these displacements to within a factor of two of their design.

During LIGO's fifth Science Run in November 2005, sensitivity reached the primary design specification of a detectable strain of 10−21 over a 100 Hz bandwidth. The baseline inspiral of two roughly solar-mass neutron stars is typically expected to be observable if it occurs within about 8 million parsecs (26×10^6 ly), or the vicinity of the Local Group, averaged over all directions and polarizations. Also at this time, LIGO and GEO 600 (the German-UK interferometric detector) began a joint science run, during which they collected data for several months. Virgo (the French-Italian interferometric detector) joined in May 2007. The fifth science run ended in 2007, after extensive analysis of data from this run did not uncover any unambiguous detection events.

In February 2007, GRB 070201, a short gamma-ray burst arrived at Earth from the direction of the Andromeda Galaxy. The prevailing explanation of most short gamma-ray bursts is the merger of a neutron star with either a neutron star or a black hole. LIGO reported a non-detection for GRB 070201, ruling out a merger at the distance of Andromeda with high confidence. Such a constraint was predicated on LIGO eventually demonstrating a direct detection of gravitational waves.[84]

Enhanced LIGO

[edit]
Northern leg (x-arm) of LIGO interferometer on Hanford Reservation

After the completion of Science Run 5, initial LIGO was upgraded with certain technologies, planned for Advanced LIGO but available and able to be retrofitted to initial LIGO, which resulted in an improved-performance configuration dubbed Enhanced LIGO.[85] Some of the improvements in Enhanced LIGO included:

  • Increased laser power
  • Homodyne detection
  • Output mode cleaner
  • In-vacuum readout hardware

Science Run 6 (S6) began in July 2009 with the enhanced configurations on the 4 km detectors.[86] It concluded in October 2010, and the disassembly of the original detectors began.

Advanced LIGO

[edit]
Simplified diagram of an Advanced LIGO detector (not to scale).
Design sensitivity of Advanced LIGO interferometer with major noise sources, maximum sensitivity is around 500 Hz[87]

After 2010, LIGO went offline for several years for a major upgrade, installing the new Advanced LIGO detectors in the LIGO Observatory infrastructures.

The project continued to attract new members, with the Australian National University and University of Adelaide contributing to Advanced LIGO, and by the time the LIGO Laboratory started the first observing run 'O1' with the Advanced LIGO detectors in September 2015, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration included more than 900 scientists worldwide.[9]

The first observing run operated at a sensitivity roughly three times greater than Initial LIGO,[88] and a much greater sensitivity for larger systems with their peak radiation at lower audio frequencies.[89]

On February 11, 2016, the LIGO and Virgo collaborations announced the first observation of gravitational waves.[48][68] The signal, named GW150914,[68][90] was recorded on September 14, 2015, just two days after Advanced LIGO started collecting data following the upgrade.[48][91][92] It matched the predictions of general relativity[81][82][83] for the inward spiral and merger of a pair of black holes and subsequent ringdown of the resulting single black hole. The observations demonstrated the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.

On June 15, 2016, LIGO announced the detection of a second gravitational wave event, recorded on December 26, 2015, at 3:38 UTC. Analysis of the observed signal indicated that the event was caused by the merger of two black holes with masses of 14.2 and 7.5 solar masses, at a distance of 1.4 billion light years.[51] The signal was named GW151226.[93]

The second observing run (O2) ran from November 30, 2016[94] to August 25, 2017,[95] with Livingston achieving 15–25% sensitivity improvement over O1, and with Hanford's sensitivity similar to O1.[96] In this period, LIGO saw several further gravitational wave events: GW170104 in January; GW170608 in June; and five others between July and August 2017. Several of these were also detected by the Virgo Collaboration.[97][98][99] Unlike the black hole mergers which are only detectable gravitationally, GW170817 came from the collision of two neutron stars and was also detected electromagnetically by gamma ray satellites and optical telescopes.[98]

The third run (O3) began on April 1, 2019[100] and was planned to last until April 30, 2020; in fact it was suspended in March 2020 due to COVID-19.[18][101][102] On January 6, 2020, LIGO announced the detection of what appeared to be gravitational ripples from a collision of two neutron stars, recorded on April 25, 2019, by the LIGO Livingston detector. Unlike GW170817, this event did not result in any light being detected. Furthermore, this is the first published event for a single-observatory detection, given that the LIGO Hanford detector was temporarily offline at the time and the event was too faint to be visible in Virgo's data.[103]

The fourth observing run (O4) was planned to start in December 2022,[104] but was postponed until May 24, 2023. O4 is concluded on November 18, 2025.[20][105] As of O4, the interferometers are operating at a sensitivity of 155–175 Mpc,[20] within the design sensitivity range of 160–190 Mpc for binary neutron star events.[106]

The fifth observing run (O5) is projected to begin in September or October 2026.[20][105]

Future

[edit]

LIGO-India

[edit]
Main article: INDIGO

LIGO-India, or INDIGO, is a planned collaborative project between the LIGO Laboratory and the Indian Initiative in Gravitational-wave Observations (IndIGO) to create a gravitational-wave detector in India. The LIGO Laboratory, in collaboration with the US National Science Foundation and Advanced LIGO partners from the U.K., Germany and Australia, has offered to provide all of the designs and hardware for one of the three planned Advanced LIGO detectors to be installed, commissioned, and operated by an Indian team of scientists in a facility to be built in India.

The LIGO-India project is a collaboration between LIGO Laboratory and the LIGO-India consortium: Institute of Plasma Research, Gandhinagar; IUCAA (Inter-University Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics), Pune and Raja Ramanna Centre for Advanced Technology, Indore.

The expansion of worldwide activities in gravitational-wave detection to produce an effective global network has been a goal of LIGO for many years. In 2010, a developmental roadmap[107] issued by the Gravitational Wave International Committee (GWIC) recommended that an expansion of the global array of interferometric detectors be pursued as a highest priority. Such a network would afford astrophysicists with more robust search capabilities and higher scientific yields. The current agreement between the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo collaboration links three detectors of comparable sensitivity and forms the core of this international network. Studies indicate that the localization of sources by a network that includes a detector in India would provide significant improvements.[108][109] Improvements in localization averages are predicted to be approximately an order of magnitude, with substantially larger improvements in certain regions of the sky.

The NSF was willing to permit this relocation, and its consequent schedule delays, as long as it did not increase the LIGO budget. Thus, all costs required to build a laboratory equivalent to the LIGO sites to house the detector would have to be borne by the host country.[110] The first potential distant location was at AIGO in Western Australia,[111] however the Australian government was unwilling to commit funding by October 1, 2011, deadline.

A location in India was discussed at a Joint Commission meeting between India and the US in June 2012.[112] In parallel, the proposal was evaluated by LIGO's funding agency, the NSF. As the basis of the LIGO-India project entails the transfer of one of LIGO's detectors to India, the plan would affect work and scheduling on the Advanced LIGO upgrades already underway. In August 2012, the U.S. National Science Board approved the LIGO Laboratory's request to modify the scope of Advanced LIGO by not installing the Hanford "H2" interferometer, and to prepare it instead for storage in anticipation of sending it to LIGO-India.[113] In India, the project was presented to the Department of Atomic Energy and the Department of Science and Technology for approval and funding. On February 17, 2016, less than a week after LIGO's landmark announcement about the detection of gravitational waves, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that the Cabinet has granted 'in-principle' approval to the LIGO-India mega science proposal.[114]

A site near pilgrimage site of Aundha Nagnath in the Hingoli district of state Maharashtra in western India has been selected.[115][116]

On April 7, 2023, the LIGO-India project was approved by the Cabinet of Government of India. Construction is to begin in Maharashtra's Hingoli district at a cost of INR 2600 crores.[117]

A+

[edit]

Like Enhanced LIGO, certain improvements will be retrofitted to the existing Advanced LIGO instrument. These are referred to as A+ proposals, and are planned for installation starting from 2019 until the upgraded detector is operational in 2024.[118] The changes would almost double Advanced LIGO's sensitivity,[119][120] and increase the volume of space searched by a factor of seven.[121] The upgrades include:

  • Improvements to the mirror suspension system.[122]
  • Increased reflectivity of the mirrors.
  • Using frequency-dependent squeezed light, which would simultaneously decrease radiation pressure at low frequencies and shot noise at high frequencies, and
  • Improved mirror coatings with lower mechanical loss.[123]

Because the final LIGO output photodetector is sensitive to phase, and not amplitude, it is possible to squeeze the signal so there is less phase noise and more amplitude noise, without violating the quantum mechanical limit on their product.[124] This is done by injecting a "squeezed vacuum state" into the dark port (interferometer output) which is quieter, in the relevant parameter, than simple darkness. Such a squeezing upgrade was installed at both LIGO sites prior to the third observing run.[125] The A+ improvement will see the installation of an additional optical cavity that acts to rotate the squeezing quadrature from phase-squeezed at high frequencies (above 50 Hz) to amplitude-squeezed at low frequencies, thereby also mitigating low-frequency radiation pressure noise.

LIGO Voyager

[edit]

A third-generation detector at the existing LIGO sites is being planned under the name "LIGO Voyager" to improve the sensitivity by an additional factor of two, and halve the low-frequency cutoff to 10 Hz.[126] Plans call for the glass mirrors and 1064 nm lasers to be replaced by even larger 160 kg silicon test masses, cooled to 123 K (a temperature achievable with liquid nitrogen), and a change to a longer laser wavelength in the range 1500–2200 nm at which silicon is transparent. (Many documents assume a wavelength of 1550 nm, but this is not final.)

Voyager would be an upgrade to A+, to be operational around 2027–2028.[127]

Cosmic Explorer

[edit]

A design for two larger observatories with longer arms is called "Cosmic Explorer". This is based on the LIGO Voyager technology, including a similar LIGO-type L-shape geometry, but with 20 and 40 km arms. It is currently planned to be on the surface. It has a higher sensitivity than Einstein Telescope for frequencies beyond 10 Hz, but lower sensitivity under 10 Hz.[126]

See also

[edit]
  • BlackGEM
  • Cosmic Explorer, a proposed American third-generation gravitational wave detector
  • Einstein Telescope, a proposed European third-generation gravitational wave detector
  • Einstein@Home, a volunteer distributed computing program one can download in order to help the LIGO/GEO teams analyze their data
  • Fermilab Holometer
  • GEO600, a gravitational wave detector located in Hannover, Germany
  • Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA)
  • LISA Pathfinder
  • North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves
  • PyCBC, an open source software package to help analyze LIGO data
  • Richard A. Isaacson
  • Taiji Program in Space, a future Chinese space-based gravitational wave detector
  • Tests of general relativity
  • TianQuin, a future Chinese space-based gravitational wave detector
  • Virgo interferometer, an interferometer located close to Pisa, Italy

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Barish, Barry C.; Weiss, Rainer (October 1999). "LIGO and the Detection of Gravitational Waves". Physics Today. 52 (10): 44. Bibcode:1999PhT....52j..44B. doi:10.1063/1.882861.
  2. ^ "Facts". LIGO. Archived from the original on July 4, 2017. Retrieved August 24, 2017. This is equivalent to measuring the distance from Earth to the nearest star to an accuracy smaller than the width of a human hair! (that is, to Proxima Centauri at 4.0208×1013 km).
  3. ^ "LIGO Lab Caltech MIT". Archived from the original on September 1, 2021. Retrieved June 24, 2016.
  4. ^ "LIGO MIT". Archived from the original on September 27, 2020. Retrieved June 24, 2016.
  5. ^ "Major research project to detect gravitational waves is underway". University of Birmingham News. University of Birmingham. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved November 28, 2015.
  6. ^ Shoemaker, David (2012). "The evolution of Advanced LIGO" (PDF). LIGO Magazine (1): 8. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 16, 2017. Retrieved November 28, 2015.
  7. ^ "Revolutionary Grassroots Astrophysics Project "Einstein@Home" Goes Live". Archived from the original on April 9, 2023. Retrieved March 3, 2016.
  8. ^ "LSC/Virgo Census". myLIGO. Retrieved November 28, 2015.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  9. ^ a b c Castelvecchi, Davide (September 15, 2015), "Hunt for gravitational waves to resume after massive upgrade: LIGO experiment now has better chance of detecting ripples in space-time", Nature, 525 (7569): 301–302, Bibcode:2015Natur.525..301C, doi:10.1038/525301a, PMID 26381963
  10. ^ "BOINCstats project statistics". Archived from the original on October 1, 2012. Retrieved December 14, 2016.
  11. ^ Larger physics projects in the United States, such as Fermilab, have traditionally been funded by the Department of Energy.
  12. ^ "LIGO: The Search for Gravitational Waves". www.nsf.gov. National Science Foundation. Archived from the original on September 15, 2016. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
  13. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2017". Nobel Foundation. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved October 6, 2017.
  14. ^ "LSC News".
  15. ^ a b "LSC News".
  16. ^ The LIGO Scientific Collaboration; the Virgo Collaboration; Abbott, B. P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T. D.; Abraham, S.; Acernese, F.; Ackley, K.; Adams, C.; Adhikari, R. X.; Adya, V. B. (September 4, 2019). "GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs". Physical Review X. 9 (3) 031040. arXiv:1811.12907. Bibcode:2019PhRvX...9c1040A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031040. ISSN 2160-3308. S2CID 119366083.
  17. ^ LIGO (November 1, 2019). "Welcome to O3b!". @ligo. Archived from the original on November 1, 2019. Retrieved November 11, 2019.
  18. ^ a b c "LIGO Suspends Third Observing Run (O3)". March 26, 2020. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  19. ^ https://ligo.org/ligo-virgo-kagra-collaboration-successfully-wraps-up-its-fourth-observing-run/
  20. ^ a b c d e "Gravitational-Wave Observatory Status". Gravitational Wave Open Science Center. May 24, 2023. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  21. ^ Castelvecchi, Davide (May 24, 2023). "Gravitational-wave detector LIGO is back — and can now spot more colliding black holes than ever". Nature. 618 (7963): 13–14. Bibcode:2023Natur.618...13C. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-01732-4. PMID 37225822. S2CID 258899900. Archived from the original on May 25, 2023. Retrieved May 25, 2023.
  22. ^ "LIGO, VIRGO AND KAGRA OBSERVING RUN PLANS". Archived from the original on December 14, 2021. Retrieved December 14, 2021.
  23. ^ a b c d e f g h i Setting Priorities for Large Research Facility Projects Supported by the National Science Foundation. National Academies Press. 2004. pp. 109–117. Bibcode:2004splr.rept.....C. doi:10.17226/10895. ISBN 978-0-309-09084-1. Archived from the original on April 15, 2016. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  24. ^ Gertsenshtein, M.E. (1962). "Wave Resonance of Light and Gravitational Waves". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 14: 84.
  25. ^ Weiss, Rainer (1972). "Electromagnetically coupled broadband gravitational wave antenna". Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics. 105 (54): 84. Archived from the original on March 2, 2016. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  26. ^ "A brief history of LIGO" (PDF). ligo.caltech.edu. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 3, 2017. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  27. ^ a b Buderi, Robert (September 19, 1988). "Going after gravity: How a high-risk project got funded". The Scientist. 2 (17): 1. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
  28. ^ a b c Mervis, Jeffery. "Funding of two science labs receives pork barrel vs beer peer review debate". The Scientist. 5 (23). Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  29. ^ a b Waldrop, M. Mitchell (September 7, 1990). "Of politics, pulsars, death spirals – and LIGO". Science. 249 (4973): 1106–1108. Bibcode:1990Sci...249.1106W. doi:10.1126/science.249.4973.1106. PMID 17831979.
  30. ^ "Gravitational waves detected 100 years after Einstein's prediction" (PDF). LIGO. February 11, 2016. Archived from the original (PDF) on April 3, 2016. Retrieved February 11, 2016.
  31. ^ Irion, Robert (April 21, 2000). "LIGO's mission of gravity". Science. 288 (5465): 420–423. doi:10.1126/science.288.5465.420. S2CID 119020354.
  32. ^ a b c d "Interview with Barry Barish" (PDF). Shirley Cohen. Caltech. 1998. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 23, 2015. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  33. ^ a b Cook, Victor (September 21, 2001). NSF Management and Oversight of LIGO. Large Facility Projects Best Practices Workshop. NSF.
  34. ^ Travis, John (February 18, 2016). "LIGO: A$250 million gamble". Science. 260 (5108): 612–614. Bibcode:1993Sci...260..612T. doi:10.1126/science.260.5108.612. PMID 17812204.
  35. ^ Anderson, Christopher (March 11, 1994). "LIGO director out in shakeup". Science. 263 (5152): 1366. Bibcode:1994Sci...263.1366A. doi:10.1126/science.263.5152.1366. PMID 17776497.
  36. ^ Browne, Malcolm W. (April 30, 1991). "Experts clash over project to detect gravity wave". New York Times. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  37. ^ Anderson, Christopher (March 11, 1994). "LIGO director out in shakeup". Science. 263 (5152): 1366. Bibcode:1994Sci...263.1366A. doi:10.1126/science.263.5152.1366. PMID 17776497.
  38. ^ Witze, Alexandra (July 16, 2014), "Physics: Wave of the future", Nature, 511 (7509): 278–81, Bibcode:2014Natur.511..278W, doi:10.1038/511278a, PMID 25030149
  39. ^ "Gravitational wave detection a step closer with Advanced LIGO". SPIE Newsroom. Archived from the original on December 26, 2018. Retrieved January 4, 2016.
  40. ^ "Daniel Sigg: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the era of First Discoveries". SPIE Newsroom. Archived from the original on December 27, 2025. Retrieved September 9, 2016.
  41. ^ Ghosh, Pallab (February 11, 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves 'seen' from black holes". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 11, 2016. Retrieved February 18, 2016.
  42. ^ "Gravitational waves detected 100 years after Einstein's prediction". www.mpg.de. Max-Planck-Gelschaft. Archived from the original on April 17, 2016. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
  43. ^ "LIGO Hanford's H1 Achieves Two-Hour Full Lock". February 2015. Archived from the original on September 22, 2015.
  44. ^ Zhang, Sarah (September 15, 2015). "The Long Search for Elusive Ripples in Spacetime". Wired. Archived from the original on December 22, 2016. Retrieved March 8, 2017.
  45. ^ Amos, Jonathan (September 19, 2015). "Advanced Ligo: Labs 'open their ears' to the cosmos". BBC News. Archived from the original on September 20, 2015. Retrieved September 19, 2015.
  46. ^ "Planning for a bright tomorrow: prospects for gravitational-wave astronomy with Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo". LIGO Scientific Collaboration. December 23, 2015. Archived from the original on April 23, 2016. Retrieved December 31, 2015.
  47. ^ LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, B. P. Abbott (February 11, 2016). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Physical Review Letters. 116 (6) 061102. arXiv:1602.03837. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116f1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. PMID 26918975. S2CID 124959784.
  48. ^ a b c Castelvecchi, Davide; Witze, Witze (February 11, 2016). "Einstein's gravitational waves found at last". Nature News. doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19361. S2CID 182916902. Archived from the original on December 24, 2018. Retrieved February 11, 2016.
  49. ^ New results on the Search for Gravitational Waves. CERN Colloquium. 2016. Archived from the original on October 12, 2017. Retrieved February 21, 2016.
  50. ^ "Fundamental Physics Prize – News". Fundamental Physics Prize (2016). Archived from the original on May 7, 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2016.
  51. ^ a b Chu, Jennifer (June 15, 2016). "For second time, LIGO detects gravitational waves". MIT News. MIT. Archived from the original on June 16, 2016. Retrieved June 15, 2016.
  52. ^ B. P. Abbott; et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (June 1, 2017). "GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2". Physical Review Letters. 118 (22) 221101. arXiv:1706.01812. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.118v1101A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101. PMID 28621973. S2CID 206291714.
  53. ^ Conover, E. (June 1, 2017). "LIGO snags another set of gravitational waves". Science News. Archived from the original on June 3, 2017. Retrieved June 3, 2017.
  54. ^ "College of Sciences Professor Appointed to Top Role in Search for Gravitational Waves | News Center". Archived from the original on February 28, 2024. Retrieved January 14, 2023.
  55. ^ "GW170814: A three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence". Archived from the original on September 28, 2017. Retrieved September 29, 2017.
  56. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 2017". Nobelprize.org. Archived from the original on August 13, 2018. Retrieved October 4, 2017.
  57. ^ Rincon, Paul; Amos, Jonathan (October 3, 2017). "Einstein's waves win Nobel Prize". BBC News. Archived from the original on July 9, 2022. Retrieved October 3, 2017.
  58. ^ Overbye, Dennis (October 3, 2017). "2017 Nobel Prize in Physics Awarded to LIGO Black Hole Researchers". The New York Times. Archived from the original on May 2, 2019. Retrieved October 3, 2017.
  59. ^ "LSC News" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 27, 2019. Retrieved March 31, 2019.
  60. ^ Moore, Christopher; Cole, Robert; Berry, Christopher (July 19, 2013). "Gravitational Wave Detectors and Sources". Archived from the original on December 29, 2014. Retrieved April 20, 2014.
  61. ^ "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1993: Russell A. Hulse, Joseph H. Taylor Jr". nobelprize.org. Archived from the original on June 13, 2017. Retrieved June 14, 2017.
  62. ^ "Obituary: Dr. Robert L. Forward". www.spaceref.com. September 21, 2002. Retrieved September 3, 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  63. ^ M.E. Gertsenshtein (1961). "Wave Resonance of Light and Gravitational Waves". JETP. 41 (1): 113–114. Archived from the original on February 6, 2016. Retrieved January 19, 2016.
  64. ^ Gertsenshtein, M. E.; Pustovoit, V. I. (August 1962). "On the detection of low frequency gravitational waves". JETP. 43: 605–607.
  65. ^ Bonazzola, S; Marck, J A (1994). "Astrophysical Sources of Gravitational Radiation". Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science. 44 (44): 655–717. Bibcode:1994ARNPS..44..655B. doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.44.120194.003255.
  66. ^ "Location of the Source". Gravitational Wave Astrophysics. University of Birmingham. Archived from the original on December 8, 2015. Retrieved November 28, 2015.
  67. ^ "LIGO's Interferometer". Archived from the original on April 19, 2016. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  68. ^ a b c Abbott, B.P.; et al. (2016). "Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger". Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (6) 061102. arXiv:1602.03837. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116f1102A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102. PMID 26918975. S2CID 124959784.
  69. ^ Thorne, Kip (2012). "Chapter 27.6: The Detection of Gravitational Waves (in "Applications of Classical Physics chapter 27: Gravitational Waves and Experimental Tests of General Relativity", Caltech lecture notes)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on October 27, 2015. Retrieved February 11, 2016.
  70. ^ "LIGO's Interferometer". Archived from the original on April 19, 2016. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  71. ^ Abbott BP, Abbott R, Abbott TD, Acernese F, Ackley K, Adams C, et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration & Virgo Collaboration) (October 2017). "GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral". Physical Review Letters. 119 (16) 161101. arXiv:1710.05832. Bibcode:2017PhRvL.119p1101A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101. PMID 29099225.
  72. ^ Helmling-Cornell, A F; Nguyen, P; Schofield, R M S; Frey, R (July 18, 2024). "Automated evaluation of environmental coupling for Advanced LIGO gravitational wave detections". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 41 (14): 145003. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad5139.
  73. ^ a b c Effler, A; Schofield, R M S; Frolov, V V; González, G; Kawabe, K; Smith, J R; Birch, J; McCarthy, R (February 5, 2015). "Environmental influences on the LIGO gravitational wave detectors during the 6th science run". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 32 (3) 035017. arXiv:1409.5160. Bibcode:2015CQGra..32c5017E. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/3/035017. ISSN 0264-9381. Archived from the original on December 15, 2025. Retrieved July 2, 2025.
  74. ^ Schofield, Robert. "LIGO environmental influences". Archived from the original on January 12, 2026. Retrieved July 2, 2025.
  75. ^ Nguyen, P; Schofield, R M S; Effler, A; Austin, C; Adya, V; Ball, M; Banagiri, S; Banowetz, K; Billman, C; Blair, C D; Buikema, A; Cahillane, C; Clara, F; Covas, P B; Dalya, G (July 22, 2021). "Environmental noise in advanced LIGO detectors". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 38 (14): 145001. arXiv:2101.09935. Bibcode:2021CQGra..38n5001N. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac011a. ISSN 0264-9381.
  76. ^ a b Fiori, Irene; Effler, Anamaria; Nguyen, Philippe; Paoletti, Federico; Schofield, Robert M. S.; Tringali, Maria C. (2021), Bambi, Cosimo; Katsanevas, Stavros; Kokkotas, Konstantinos D. (eds.), "Environmental Noise in Gravitational-Wave Interferometers", Handbook of Gravitational Wave Astronomy, Singapore: Springer Singapore, pp. 1–72, Bibcode:2021hgwa.bookE..10F, doi:10.1007/978-981-15-4702-7_10-1, ISBN 978-981-15-4702-7, retrieved July 2, 2025{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link)
  77. ^ "aLIGO LHO Logbook: Why the GW channel detects thirsty black ravens along with colliding black holes". alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu. July 19, 2017. Archived from the original on September 27, 2025. Retrieved July 1, 2025.
  78. ^ Coughlin, S.; Bahaadini, S.; Rohani, N.; Zevin, M.; Patane, O.; Harandi, M.; Jackson, C.; Noroozi, V.; Allen, S.; Areeda, J.; Coughlin, M.; Ruiz, P.; Berry, C. P. L.; Crowston, K.; Katsaggelos, A. K. (April 16, 2019). "Classifying the unknown: Discovering novel gravitational-wave detector glitches using similarity learning". Physical Review D. 99 (8) 082002. arXiv:1903.04058. Bibcode:2019PhRvD..99h2002C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.082002.
  79. ^ Aston, S M; Barton, M A; Bell, A S; Beveridge, N; Bland, B; Brummitt, A J; Cagnoli, G; Cantley, C A; Carbone, L; Cumming, A V; Cunningham, L; Cutler, R M; Greenhalgh, R J S; Hammond, G D; Haughian, K (December 7, 2012). "Update on quadruple suspension design for Advanced LIGO". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 29 (23) 235004. Bibcode:2012CQGra..29w5004A. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/23/235004. ISSN 0264-9381. Archived from the original on December 10, 2025. Retrieved July 2, 2025.
  80. ^ Thorne, Kip S.; Winstein, Carolee J. (September 24, 1999). "Human gravity-gradient noise in interferometric gravitational-wave detectors". Physical Review D. 60 (8) 082001. arXiv:gr-qc/9810016. Bibcode:1999PhRvD..60h2001T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.60.082001. ISSN 0556-2821.
  81. ^ a b Pretorius, Frans (2005). "Evolution of Binary Black-Hole Spacetimes". Physical Review Letters. 95 (12) 121101. arXiv:gr-qc/0507014. Bibcode:2005PhRvL..95l1101P. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.121101. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 16197061. S2CID 24225193.
  82. ^ a b Campanelli, M.; Lousto, C.O.; Marronetti, P.; Zlochower, Y. (2006). "Accurate Evolutions of Orbiting Black-Hole Binaries without Excision". Physical Review Letters. 96 (11) 111101. arXiv:gr-qc/0511048. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96k1101C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111101. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 16605808. S2CID 5954627.
  83. ^ a b Baker, John G.; Centrella, Joan; Choi, Dae-Il; Koppitz, Michael; van Meter, James (2006). "Gravitational-Wave Extraction from an Inspiraling Configuration of Merging Black Holes". Physical Review Letters. 96 (11) 111102. arXiv:gr-qc/0511103. Bibcode:2006PhRvL..96k1102B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.111102. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 16605809. S2CID 23409406.
  84. ^ Svitil, Kathy (January 2, 2008). "LIGO Sheds Light on Cosmic Event" (Press release). California Institute of Technology. Retrieved February 14, 2016.
  85. ^ Adhikari, Rana; Fritschel, Peter; Waldman, Sam (July 17, 2006). Enhanced LIGO (PDF) (Technical report). LIGO-T060156-01-I.
  86. ^ Beckett, Dave (June 15, 2009). "Firm Date Set for Start of S6". LIGO Laboratory News. Archived from the original on September 7, 2025. Retrieved August 14, 2025.
  87. ^ Danilishin, Stefan L.; Khalili, Farid Ya.; Miao, Haixing (April 29, 2019). "Advanced quantum techniques for future gravitational-wave detectors". Living Reviews in Relativity. 22 (1): 2. arXiv:1903.05223. Bibcode:2019LRR....22....2D. doi:10.1007/s41114-019-0018-y. ISSN 2367-3613. S2CID 119238143.
  88. ^ Burtnyk, Kimberly (September 18, 2015). "The Newest Search for Gravitational Waves has Begun". LIGO Scientific Collaboration. Archived from the original on July 4, 2017. Retrieved September 9, 2017. LIGO's advanced detectors are already three times more sensitive than Initial LIGO was by the end of its observational lifetime
  89. ^ Aasi, J (April 9, 2015). "Advanced LIGO". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 32 (7) 074001. arXiv:1411.4547. Bibcode:2015CQGra..32g4001L. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/32/7/074001. S2CID 118570458.
  90. ^ Naeye, Robert (February 11, 2016). "Gravitational Wave Detection Heralds New Era of Science". Sky and Telescope. Retrieved February 11, 2016.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
  91. ^ Cho, Adrian (February 11, 2016). "Here's the first person to spot those gravitational waves". Science. doi:10.1126/science.aaf4039. Archived from the original on June 20, 2022. Retrieved June 30, 2022.
  92. ^ "Gravitational waves from black holes detected". BBC News. February 11, 2016. Archived from the original on June 3, 2018. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
  93. ^ Abbott, B.P.; Abbott, R.; Abbott, T.D.; et al. (June 15, 2016). "GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22 Solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence". Physical Review Letters. 116 (24) 241103. arXiv:1606.04855. Bibcode:2016PhRvL.116x1103A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.241103. PMID 27367379. S2CID 118651851. Archived from the original on June 18, 2016. Retrieved June 16, 2016.
  94. ^ "VIRGO joins LIGO for the "Observation Run 2" (O2) data-taking period" (PDF). LIGO Scientific Collaboration & VIRGO collaboration. August 1, 2017. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 10, 2017. Retrieved October 20, 2017.
  95. ^ "Update on the start of LIGO's 3rd observing run". April 24, 2018. Archived from the original on August 31, 2018. Retrieved August 31, 2018. the start of O3 is currently projected to begin in early 2019. Updates will be provided once the installation phase is complete and the commissioning phase has begun. An update on the engineering run prior to O3 will be provided by late summer 2018.
  96. ^ Grant, Andrew (December 12, 2016). "Advanced LIGO ramps up, with slight improvements". Physics Today. No. 11. doi:10.1063/PT.5.9074. The bottom line is that [the sensitivity] is better than it was at the beginning of O1; we expect to get more detections.
  97. ^ "GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs". Archived from the original on December 2, 2018. Retrieved December 1, 2018.
  98. ^ a b Chu, Jennifer (October 16, 2017). "LIGO and Virgo make first detection of gravitational waves produced by colliding neutron stars" (Press release). LIGO. Archived from the original on October 17, 2017. Retrieved October 16, 2017.
  99. ^ "Gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger observed by LIGO and Virgo". Archived from the original on October 12, 2017. Retrieved October 12, 2017.
  100. ^ "LIGO and Virgo Detect Neutron Star Smash-Ups". Archived from the original on July 8, 2019. Retrieved June 28, 2019.
  101. ^ "Observatory Status". LIGO. March 23, 2020. Archived from the original on April 9, 2020. Retrieved June 23, 2020.
  102. ^ Diego Bersanetti: Status of the Virgo gravitational-wave detector and the O3 Observing Run, EPS-HEP2019
  103. ^ "LIGO-Virgo network catches another neutron star collision". Archived from the original on January 12, 2020. Retrieved January 12, 2020.
  104. ^ "LIGO Laboratory statement on long term future observing plans". LIGO Lab. Archived from the original on March 26, 2022. Retrieved March 22, 2022.
  105. ^ a b "LIGO, VIRGO AND KAGRA OBSERVING RUN PLANS". IGWN. February 13, 2026. Archived from the original on June 25, 2022. Retrieved February 19, 2026.
  106. ^ Abbott, B. P.; et al. (November 24, 2020). "Prospects for Observing and Localizing Gravitational-Wave Transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA". Living Reviews in Relativity. 23 (1): 3. arXiv:1304.0670. Bibcode:2020LRR....23....3A. doi:10.1007/s41114-020-00026-9. PMC 7520625. PMID 33015351.
  107. ^ "The future of gravitational wave astronomy" (PDF). Gravitational Waves International Committee. Archived from the original (PDF) on July 30, 2017. Retrieved September 3, 2018.
  108. ^ Fairhurst, Stephen (September 28, 2012), "Improved Source Localization with LIGO India", Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 484 (1) 012007, arXiv:1205.6611, Bibcode:2014JPhCS.484a2007F, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/484/1/012007, S2CID 118583506, LIGO document P1200054-v6, archived from the original on July 14, 2014, retrieved October 19, 2012
  109. ^ Schutz, Bernard F. (April 25, 2011), "Networks of Gravitational Wave Detectors and Three Figures of Merit", Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28 (12) 125023, arXiv:1102.5421, Bibcode:2011CQGra..28l5023S, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/12/125023, S2CID 119247573
  110. ^ Cho, Adrian (August 27, 2010), "U.S. Physicists Eye Australia for New Site of Gravitational-Wave Detector" (PDF), Science, 329 (5995): 1003, Bibcode:2010Sci...329.1003C, doi:10.1126/science.329.5995.1003, PMID 20798288, archived from the original (PDF) on April 11, 2013
  111. ^ Finn, Sam; Fritschel, Peter; Klimenko, Sergey; Raab, Fred; Sathyaprakash, B.; Saulson, Peter; Weiss, Rainer (May 13, 2010), Report of the Committee to Compare the Scientific Cases for AHLV and HHLV, LIGO document T1000251-v1, archived from the original on October 6, 2014, retrieved October 1, 2014
  112. ^ U.S.-India Bilateral Cooperation on Science and Technology Archived August 3, 2020, at the Wayback Machine meeting fact sheet – dated June 13, 2012.
  113. ^ Memorandum to Members and Consultants of the National Science Board Archived April 3, 2021, at the Wayback Machine – dated August 24, 2012
  114. ^ Office of the Prime Minister of India [@PMOIndia] (February 17, 2016). "Cabinet has granted 'in-principle' approval to the LIGO-India mega science proposal for research on gravitational waves" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  115. ^ "First LIGO Lab Outside US To Come Up In Maharashtra's Hingoli". NDTV. September 8, 2016. Archived from the original on March 2, 2017. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  116. ^ Souradeep, Tarun (January 18, 2019). "LIGO-India: Origins & site search" (PDF). p. 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 15, 2019. Retrieved September 15, 2019.
  117. ^ "Cabinet clears Rs 2,600-crore LIGO-India; Observatory to come up in Maharashtra, will be part of global network". The Times of India. April 7, 2023. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved April 22, 2024.
  118. ^ "Upgraded LIGO to search for universe's most extreme events". www.nsf.gov. February 14, 2019. Retrieved April 9, 2020.[dead link]
  119. ^ Miller, John; Barsotti, Lisa; Vitale, Salvatore; Fritschel, Peter; Evans, Matthew; Sigg, Daniel (March 16, 2015). "Prospects for doubling the range of Advanced LIGO" (PDF). Physical Review D. 91 (62005) 062005. arXiv:1410.5882. Bibcode:2015PhRvD..91f2005M. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.062005. S2CID 18460400. Archived (PDF) from the original on August 9, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2016.
  120. ^ Zucker, Michael E. (July 7, 2016). Getting an A+: Enhancing Advanced LIGO. LIGO–DAWN Workshop II. LIGO-G1601435-v3. Archived from the original on March 1, 2017. Retrieved March 1, 2017.
  121. ^ Thompson, Avery (February 15, 2019). "LIGO Gravitational Wave Observatory Getting $30 Million Upgrade". www.popularmechanics.com. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  122. ^ Ghosh, Pallab (February 15, 2019). "Black hole detectors to get big upgrade". Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  123. ^ "LIGO-T1800042-v5: The A+ design curve". dcc.ligo.org. Retrieved April 9, 2020.
  124. ^ "The Quantum Enhanced LIGO Detector Sets New Sensitivity Record". Archived from the original on November 26, 2017. Retrieved November 23, 2017.
  125. ^ Tse, M.; Yu, Haocun; Kijbunchoo, N.; Fernandez-Galiana, A.; Dupej, P.; Barsotti, L.; Blair, C. D.; Brown, D. D.; Dwyer, S. E.; Effler, A.; Evans, M. (December 5, 2019). "Quantum-Enhanced Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of Gravitational-Wave Astronomy". Physical Review Letters. 123 (23) 231107. Bibcode:2019PhRvL.123w1107T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.231107. hdl:1721.1/136579.2. PMID 31868462.
  126. ^ a b McClelland, David; Evans, Matthew; Lantz, Brian; Martin, Ian; Quetschke, Volker; Schnabel, Roman (October 8, 2015). Instrument Science White Paper (Report). LIGO Scientific Collaboration. LIGO Document T1500290-v2. Archived from the original on August 4, 2016. Retrieved June 20, 2016.
  127. ^ LIGO Scientific Collaboration (February 10, 2015). Instrument Science White Paper (PDF) (Technical report). LIGO. LIGO-T1400316-v4. Retrieved June 23, 2020.

References

[edit]
  • Kip Thorne, ITP & Caltech. Spacetime Warps and the Quantum: A Glimpse of the Future. Archived July 16, 2016, at the Wayback Machine Lecture slides and audio
  • Barry C. Barish, Caltech. The Detection of Gravitational Waves. Archived February 13, 2023, at the Wayback Machine Video from CERN Academic Training Lectures, 1996
  • Barry C. Barish, Caltech. Einstein's Unfinished Symphony: Sounds from the Distant Universe Archived January 28, 2017, at the Wayback Machine Video from IHMC Florida Institute for Human Machine Cognition 2004 Evening Lecture Series.
  • Rainer Weiss, Electromagnetically coupled broad-band gravitational wave antenna, MIT RLE QPR 1972
  • On the detection of low frequency gravitational waves, M.E. Gertsenshtein and V.I. Pustovoit – JETP Vol. 43 pp. 605–607 (August 1962) Note: This is the first paper proposing the use of interferometers for the detection of gravitational waves.
  • Wave resonance of light and gravitational waves – M.E. Gertsenshtein – JETP Vol. 41 pp. 113–114 (July 1961)
  • Gravitational electromagnetic resonance, V.B. Braginskii, M.B. Mensky – GR.G. Vol. 3 No. 4 pp. 401–402 (1972)
  • Gravitational radiation and the prospect of its experimental discovery, V.B. Braginsky – Usp. Fiz. Nauk Vol. 86 pp. 433–446 (July 1965). English translation: Sov. Phys. Uspekhi Vol. 8 No. 4 pp. 513–521 (1966)
  • On the electromagnetic detection of gravitational waves, V.B. Braginsky, L.P. Grishchuck, A.G. Dooshkevieh, M.B. Mensky, I.D. Novikov, M.V. Sazhin and Y.B. Zeldovisch – GR.G. Vol. 11 No. 6 pp. 407–408 (1979)
  • On the propagation of electromagnetic radiation in the field of a plane gravitational wave, E. Montanari – gr-qc/9806054 (June 11, 1998)

Further reading

[edit]
  • Barish, Barry C. (2000). "The Science and Detection of Gravitational Waves" (PDF).
  • Bartusiak, Marcia (2000). Einstein's unfinished symphony: listening to the sounds of space-time. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. ISBN 978-0-425-18620-6.
  • Saulson, Peter (1994). Fundamentals of interferometric gravitational wave detectors. Singapore River Edge, NJ: World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-1820-1.
  • Collins, Harry M. (2004). Gravity's shadow the search for gravitational waves. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-11378-4.
  • Kennefick, Daniel (2007). Traveling at the speed of thought: Einstein and the quest for gravitational waves. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-11727-0.
  • Janna Levin (2016). Black hole blues : and other songs from outer space. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0307958198
  • Collins, Harry, M. (2017). Gravity's kiss: the detection of gravitational waves. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-03618-4.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

External links

[edit]
Look up ligo in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to LIGO.
  • LIGO Newsletters Archived October 13, 2022, at the Wayback Machine Excellent wide-audience newsletters published twice-yearly in March and September. From Issue 1 (September 2012) through to present day.
  • LIGO Scientific Collaboration Archived July 21, 2012, at the Wayback Machine web page
  • LIGO outreach Archived June 8, 2016, at the Wayback Machine webpage, with links to summaries of the Collaboration's scientific articles, written for a general public audience
  • LIGO Laboratory Archived January 26, 2018, at the Wayback Machine
  • LIGO News Archived February 24, 2012, at the Wayback Machine blog
  • Living LIGO Archived June 3, 2013, at the Wayback Machine blog: answering questions about LIGO science and being a scientist by LIGO member Amber Stuver
  • Advanced LIGO homepage
  • Columbia Experimental Gravity
  • American Museum of Natural History film and other materials on LIGO
  • 40 m Prototype
  • Earth-Motion studies Archived October 20, 2014, at the Wayback Machine A brief discussion of efforts to correct for seismic and human-related activity that contributes to the background signal of the LIGO detectors.
  • Caltech's Physics 237-2002 Gravitational Waves by Kip Thorne Video plus notes: Graduate level but does not assume knowledge of General Relativity, Tensor Analysis, or Differential Geometry; Part 1: Theory (10 lectures), Part 2: Detection (9 lectures)
  • Caltech Tutorial on Relativity Archived May 3, 2016, at the Wayback Machine – An extensive description of gravitational waves and their sources.
  • Q&A: Rainer Weiss on LIGO's origins Archived August 17, 2019, at the Wayback Machine at news.mit.edu
  • LIGO: a strong belief Archived March 29, 2016, at the Wayback Machine, 2/11/16 CERN Courier Interview with Barry Barish (March 18, 2016, publication date).
  • Video (3:10): LIGO Orrey (December 1, 2018) on YouTube
  • v
  • t
  • e
Gravitational-wave astronomy
  • Gravitational wave
  • Gravitational-wave observatory
Detectors
Resonant mass
antennas
Active
  • NAUTILUS (IGEC)
  • AURIGA (IGEC)
  • MiniGRAIL
  • Mario Schenberg
Past
  • EXPLORER (IGEC)
  • ALLEGRO (IGEC)
  • NIOBE (IGEC)
  • Stanford gravitational wave detector
  • ALTAIR
  • GEOGRAV
  • AGATA
  • Weber bar
Proposed
  • TOBA
Past proposals
  • GRAIL (downsized to MiniGRAIL)
  • TIGA
  • SFERA
  • Graviton (downsized to Mario Schenberg)
Ground-based
interferometers
Active
  • AIGO (ACIGA)
  • CLIO
  • Fermilab Holometer
  • GEO600
  • Advanced LIGO (LIGO Scientific Collaboration)
  • KAGRA
  • Advanced Virgo (European Gravitational Observatory)
Past
  • TAMA 300
  • TAMA 20, later known as LISM
  • TENKO-100
  • Caltech 40m interferometer
Planned
  • INDIGO (LIGO-India)
Proposed
  • Cosmic Explorer
  • Einstein Telescope
Past proposals
  • LIGO-Australia
Space-based
interferometers
Planned
  • LISA
Proposed
  • Big Bang Observer
  • DECIGO
  • TianQin
Pulsar timing arrays
  • EPTA
  • IPTA
  • NANOGrav
  • PPTA
Data analysis
  • Einstein@Home
  • PyCBC
  • Zooniverse: Gravity Spy
Observations
Events
  • List of observations
  • First observation (GW150914)
  • GW151226
  • GW170104
  • GW170608
  • GW170814
  • GW170817 (first neutron star merger)
  • GW190412
  • GW190521 (first-ever possible light from bh–bh merger)
  • GW190814 (first-ever "mass gap" collision)
  • GW200105 (first black hole – neutron star merger)
Methods
  • Direct detection
    • Laser interferometers
    • Resonant mass detectors
    • Proposed: Atom interferometers
  • Indirect detection
    • B-modes of CMB
    • Pulsar timing array
    • Binary pulsar
Theory
  • General relativity
  • Tests of general relativity
  • Metric theories
  • Graviton
Effects/properties
  • Polarization
  • Spin-flip
  • Redshift
  • Travel with speed of light
  • h strain
  • Chirp signal (chirp mass)
  • Carried energy
  • Gravitational wave background
Types/sources
  • Stochastic
    • Cosmic inflation–quantum fluctuation
    • Phase transition
  • Binary inspiral
    • Supermassive black holes
    • Stellar black holes
    • Neutron stars
    • EMRI
  • Continuous
    • Rotating neutron star
  • Burst
    • Supernova or from unknown sources
  • Hypothesis
    • Colliding cosmic string and other unknown sources
  • v
  • t
  • e
Breakthrough Prize laureates
Mathematics
  • Simon Donaldson, Maxim Kontsevich, Jacob Lurie, Terence Tao and Richard Taylor (2015)
  • Ian Agol (2016)
  • Jean Bourgain (2017)
  • Christopher Hacon, James McKernan (2018)
  • Vincent Lafforgue (2019)
  • Alex Eskin (2020)
  • Martin Hairer (2021)
  • Takuro Mochizuki (2022)
  • Daniel A. Spielman (2023)
  • Simon Brendle (2024)
  • Dennis Gaitsgory (2025)
Fundamental
physics
  • Nima Arkani-Hamed, Alan Guth, Alexei Kitaev, Maxim Kontsevich, Andrei Linde, Juan Maldacena, Nathan Seiberg, Ashoke Sen, Edward Witten (2012)
  • Special: Stephen Hawking, Peter Jenni, Fabiola Gianotti (ATLAS), Michel Della Negra, Tejinder Virdee, Guido Tonelli, Joseph Incandela (CMS) and Lyn Evans (LHC) (2013)
  • Alexander Polyakov (2013)
  • Michael Green and John Henry Schwarz (2014)
  • Saul Perlmutter and members of the Supernova Cosmology Project; Brian Schmidt, Adam Riess and members of the High-Z Supernova Team (2015)
  • Special: Ronald Drever, Kip Thorne, Rainer Weiss and contributors to LIGO project (2016)
  • Yifang Wang, Kam-Biu Luk and the Daya Bay team, Atsuto Suzuki and the KamLAND team, Kōichirō Nishikawa and the K2K / T2K team, Arthur B. McDonald and the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory team, Takaaki Kajita and Yōichirō Suzuki and the Super-Kamiokande team (2016)
  • Joseph Polchinski, Andrew Strominger, Cumrun Vafa (2017)
  • Charles L. Bennett, Gary Hinshaw, Norman Jarosik, Lyman Page Jr., David Spergel (2018)
  • Special: Jocelyn Bell Burnell (2018)
  • Charles Kane and Eugene Mele (2019)
  • Special: Sergio Ferrara, Daniel Z. Freedman, Peter van Nieuwenhuizen (2019)
  • The Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration (2020)
  • Eric Adelberger, Jens H. Gundlach and Blayne Heckel (2021)
  • Special: Steven Weinberg (2021)
  • Hidetoshi Katori and Jun Ye (2022)
  • Charles H. Bennett, Gilles Brassard, David Deutsch, Peter W. Shor (2023)
  • John Cardy and Alexander Zamolodchikov (2024)
  • Large Hadron Collider experiments: ATLAS team, CMS team, ALICE team, LHCb team (2025)
  • Special: Gerard 't Hooft (2025)
Life sciences
  • Cornelia Bargmann, David Botstein, Lewis C. Cantley, Hans Clevers, Titia de Lange, Napoleone Ferrara, Eric Lander, Charles Sawyers, Robert Weinberg, Shinya Yamanaka and Bert Vogelstein (2013)
  • James P. Allison, Mahlon DeLong, Michael N. Hall, Robert S. Langer, Richard P. Lifton and Alexander Varshavsky (2014)
  • Alim Louis Benabid, Charles David Allis, Victor Ambros, Gary Ruvkun, Jennifer Doudna and Emmanuelle Charpentier (2015)
  • Edward Boyden, Karl Deisseroth, John Hardy, Helen Hobbs and Svante Pääbo (2016)
  • Stephen J. Elledge, Harry F. Noller, Roeland Nusse, Yoshinori Ohsumi, Huda Zoghbi (2017)
  • Joanne Chory, Peter Walter, Kazutoshi Mori, Kim Nasmyth, Don W. Cleveland (2018)
  • C. Frank Bennett and Adrian R. Krainer, Angelika Amon, Xiaowei Zhuang, Zhijian Chen (2019)
  • Jeffrey M. Friedman, Franz-Ulrich Hartl, Arthur L. Horwich, David Julius, Virginia Man-Yee Lee (2020)
  • David Baker, Catherine Dulac, Dennis Lo, Richard J. Youle [de] (2021)
  • Jeffery W. Kelly, Katalin Karikó, Drew Weissman, Shankar Balasubramanian, David Klenerman and Pascal Mayer (2022)
  • Clifford P. Brangwynne, Anthony A. Hyman, Demis Hassabis, John Jumper, Emmanuel Mignot, Masashi Yanagisawa (2023)
  • Carl June, Michel Sadelain, Sabine Hadida, Paul Negulescu, Fredrick Van Goor, Thomas Gasser, Ellen Sidransky and Andrew Singleton (2024)
  • v
  • t
  • e
Laureates of the Prince or Princess of Asturias Award for Technical and Scientific Research
Prince of Asturias Award for Technical and Scientific Research
  • 1981: Alberto Sols
  • 1982: Manuel Ballester
  • 1983: Luis Antonio Santaló Sors
  • 1984: Antonio García-Bellido
  • 1985: David Vázquez Martínez and Emilio Rosenblueth
  • 1986: Antonio González González
  • 1987: Jacinto Convit and Pablo Rudomín
  • 1988: Manuel Cardona and Marcos Moshinsky
  • 1989: Guido Münch
  • 1990: Santiago Grisolía and Salvador Moncada
  • 1991: Francisco Bolívar Zapata
  • 1992: Federico García Moliner
  • 1993: Amable Liñán
  • 1994: Manuel Patarroyo
  • 1995: Manuel Losada Villasante and Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad of Costa Rica
  • 1996: Valentín Fuster
  • 1997: Atapuerca research team
  • 1998: Emilio Méndez Pérez and Pedro Miguel Echenique Landiríbar
  • 1999: Ricardo Miledi and Enrique Moreno González
  • 2000: Robert Gallo and Luc Montagnier
  • 2001: Craig Venter, John Sulston, Francis Collins, Hamilton Smith, and Jean Weissenbach
  • 2002: Lawrence Roberts, Robert E. Kahn, Vinton Cerf, and Tim Berners-Lee
  • 2003: Jane Goodall
  • 2004: Judah Folkman, Tony Hunter, Joan Massagué, Bert Vogelstein, and Robert Weinberg
  • 2005: Antonio Damasio
  • 2006: Juan Ignacio Cirac
  • 2007: Peter Lawrence and Ginés Morata
  • 2008: Sumio Iijima, Shuji Nakamura, Robert Langer, George M. Whitesides, and Tobin Marks
  • 2009: Martin Cooper and Raymond Tomlinson
  • 2010: David Julius, Baruch Minke, and Linda Watkins
  • 2011: Joseph Altman, Arturo Álvarez-Buylla, and Giacomo Rizzolatti
  • 2012: Gregory Winter and Richard A. Lerner
  • 2013: Peter Higgs, François Englert, and European Organization for Nuclear Research CERN
  • 2014: Avelino Corma Canós, Mark E. Davis, and Galen D. Stucky
Princess of Asturias Award for Technical and Scientific Research
  • 2015: Emmanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna
  • 2016: Hugh Herr
  • 2017: Rainer Weiss, Kip S. Thorne, Barry C. Barish, and the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
  • 2018: Svante Pääbo
  • 2019: Joanne Chory and Sandra Myrna Díaz
  • 2020: Yves Meyer, Ingrid Daubechies, Terence Tao, and Emmanuel Candès
  • 2021: Katalin Karikó, Drew Weissman, Philip Felgner, Uğur Şahin, Özlem Türeci, Derrick Rossi, and Sarah Gilbert
  • 2022: Geoffrey Hinton, Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Demis Hassabis
  • 2023: Jeffrey I. Gordon, Everett Peter Greenberg, and Bonnie Bassler
  • 2024: Daniel J. Drucker, Jeffrey M. Friedman, Joel F. Habener, Jens Juul Holst, and Svetlana Mojsov
  • 2025: Mary-Claire King
Portals:
  • icon Physics
  • Astronomy
  • icon Stars
  • Outer space
Authority control databases Edit this at Wikidata
International
  • ISNI
  • VIAF
  • GND
National
  • United States
Retrieved from "https://teknopedia.ac.id/w/index.php?title=LIGO&oldid=1339354708"
Categories:
  • Astronomical observatories in Louisiana
  • Astronomical observatories in Washington (state)
  • Interferometric gravitational-wave instruments
  • Gravitational wave observatories
  • Hanford Site
  • Buildings and structures in Benton County, Washington
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council
Hidden categories:
  • CS1 maint: deprecated archival service
  • CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN
  • Webarchive template wayback links
  • All articles with dead external links
  • Articles with dead external links from October 2025
  • Articles with short description
  • Short description is different from Wikidata
  • Use American English from July 2025
  • All Wikipedia articles written in American English
  • Use mdy dates from February 2026
  • Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
  • Articles using Wikidata location map with locally defined parameters
  • Articles using Infobox telescope using locally defined parameters
  • Articles containing potentially dated statements from December 2016
  • All articles containing potentially dated statements
  • Articles containing potentially dated statements from February 2026
  • Articles containing potentially dated statements from January 2021
  • Wikipedia articles in need of updating from October 2025
  • All Wikipedia articles in need of updating
  • CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list
  • Commons category link from Wikidata

  • indonesia
  • Polski
  • العربية
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español
  • Français
  • Italiano
  • مصرى
  • Nederlands
  • 日本語
  • Português
  • Sinugboanong Binisaya
  • Svenska
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Winaray
  • 中文
  • Русский
Sunting pranala
url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url url
Pusat Layanan

UNIVERSITAS TEKNOKRAT INDONESIA | ASEAN's Best Private University
Jl. ZA. Pagar Alam No.9 -11, Labuhan Ratu, Kec. Kedaton, Kota Bandar Lampung, Lampung 35132
Phone: (0721) 702022
Email: pmb@teknokrat.ac.id