Sections before Jan 2021

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Spare Ribs. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 13:06, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onward (housing association) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onward (housing association) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 19:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TM Travel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TM Travel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SK2242 (talk) 15:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kent Top Travel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent Top Travel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SK2242 (talk) 02:58, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have created Draft:Borough of Corby which may be useful since you have been interested in other new districts, I'm less sure though if Northampton should be split though. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TM Travel company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guildford (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Surrey Hills.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I noticed that you recently removed content from Highgate without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Referencing the removal of The present MP, elected in 2015, is Keir Starmer of the Labour Party under the edit summary of condensed for clarity.

Add late, footballer Gary Speed to the notable people of Flintshire 213.78.116.119 (talk) 14:38, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Wates Group. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 22:33, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barton Manor School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Schools are not notable merely due to their existence. They need to show it's notability as per WP:ORG. But I don't think school stil under construction can do so.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Radioactive (talk) 14:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Co-Wheels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-Wheels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kleuske (talk) 08:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ULEZ and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 28#ULEZ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 14:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are some districts etc that probably need articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about districts/to do if you're interested given you're interest in this area. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:43, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arcadis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcadis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WPscatter ^t/_c 07:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at UEFA Women's Euro 2022, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 11:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pitchero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitchero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maduant (talk) 08:03, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vision Bus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:NOTABLE enough: too small and run-of-the-mill of a bus operator, founded in 2014 with no real history following this date. Cannot find any sources besides regular bus service changes to justify its own article, and article isn't well put together, either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullian111 (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have anything specific in mind? I have a Google News watch for any developments. There haven't been any unless you count some junior minister visiting to Winslow. Per WP:NOTNEWS, we don't report every little detail. I don't expect any significant development before the BED-CAM route announcement next month. There will be many eyes on that one, it won't get missed. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 15:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

temporary Crookesmoor (talk) 10:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crookesmoor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weald of Kent (UK Parliament constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crookesmoor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greenwich and Woolwich (UK Parliament constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The material you added is probably not wrong, so I've not reflexively removed it, but it's not helpful to add material like this without reliable-source citations.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  18:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Privately educated musicians has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Privately educated journalists has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crookesmoor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weald of Kent".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:36, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Aldridge UTC@MediaCityUK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:41, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Twitter example share icon.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Facebook share icon example.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SWinxy (talk) 21:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wibu-Systems has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article fails to establish notability under WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brandon (talk) 22:32, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crookesmoor. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Axad12 (talk) 04:50, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]