The article Simone Pacini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY. National team caps from the infobox are unsourced and likely false.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Elita (song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop/9457612/gary-barlow-michael-buble-sebastian-yatra-elita. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greenock125, Onel5969, I've reverted this to the last clean version before the copyvio was added. Greenock125, I find it concerning (to say the least) to need to remove copyvio inserted by an editor with more than 40000 live edits. It raises this important question: do you think that there may also be other pages where you have copy-pasted content from non-free external sources? If so, would you kindly list those pages, right here on your talk-page, so that we can make a start on cleaning them up? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justlettersandnumbers, I gave a last warning for copyvio and removed autopatrolled a few months ago. I think we’re going to need a big cci and a block.... Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 01:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 03:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did warn you. I'll be opening a CCI tomorrow. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 04:00, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Greenock125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm sorry for all the copyright infringements and violations and will not copy all printed material from web pages and will use my own words in the future. I have have autism and have communication problems. So I struggle to know how to respond to these types of situations. Once again I am really sorry for everything.

Decline reason:

In order to lift the block, we need to be certain that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia. To allow the reviewing administrator to assess your understanding, please respond to the following questions in your next unblock appeal, explaining in your own words:

• What is copyright?
• How is Wikipedia licenced?
• Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia?
• Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content?
• How do you intend to avoid violating the copyright policy in the future?

Your answers will enable us to establish whether or not you should be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am really sorry for everything that I have done and will try to respond to these situations in the future. Greenock125 (talk) 10:23, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In giving your answers, you literally violated copyright. As such, I am revoking talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 11:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

A tag has been placed on Feel Something (Armin van Buuren song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://wiwibloggs.com/2020/11/07/duncan-laurence-armin-van-buuren-feel-something/258551/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 12:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Greenock125. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. jp×g 14:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carson Rowland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carson Rowland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 17:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MusicRoxMoshiMonsters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TooHotJasonDerulo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Garrix and Jay Hardway Wizard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OHolyNightLadywell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:18, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ConoDeruloPuriJhorrmountain.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Greenock125. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Cabayi (talk) 10:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: extensive "I don't understand" at Special:Permalink/1007872095. In short, Greenock125 has been evading/ignoring the block since it was imposed in Nov 2020. Cabayi (talk) 10:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: The standard offer was suggested in UTRS appeal #42609 and will become available 25 Oct 2021. Cabayi (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ITunes Festival London 2011 (ADELE).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ITunes Live from SoHo (ADELE).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Greenock125. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 WDF calendar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:InsideMyLove.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Greenock125. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 WDF calendar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I am here to talk about the article: list of awards and nominations received by Jamie Dornan. As I can see you redirected the page in 2017. And I did not know that this article already existed. So without knowing this, I have created a new draft with the same title. I have not submitted that for review yet. So can you kindly help me what can I do. Tell me if you can delete the article that you redirected in 2017. Or can you undo the redirection so that I can create an article here again ditching my own draft. Fitzwilliams (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Hogarth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Hogarth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CiphriusKane (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User engaged in block evasion on 2021-10-29. --Yamla (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sandhja albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:30, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Better than You (Conor Maynard song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better than You (Conor Maynard song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 12:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases April 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases August 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases December 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases July 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases June 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases March 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases May 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases November 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases October 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:COVID-19 pandemic data/United Kingdom/Scotland medical cases September 2020 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 07:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sinplus songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Conchita Wurst That's What I Am.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GeilaOisTrackshittaz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:29, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Grüllarei.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Guuugarutz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Killalady.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OidaChüüü.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:OidaTaunz!.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StandUpJamesCottriall.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TouchdownTrackshittaz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UnbreakableSinplus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Woki mit deim Popo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WouldYou?Iris.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StandingStill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Axel Hirsoux Mother.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Basim Cliche Love Song.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elaiza Is it Right.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ruth Lorenzo Dancing in the Rain.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Softengine Something Better.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Playing with Numbers Molly Sterling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:On My Way (Omar Naber song) cover art.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:52, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spirit of the Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:55, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WhenWereOld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PlotTwistSigrid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StrangersSigrid.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:11, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Waiting-All-Night.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christmas Is Here (Collabro album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christmas Is Here (Collabro album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 14:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Learn to Fly (Surfaces and Elton John song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn to Fly (Surfaces and Elton John song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 00:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:31, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sigma Rudeboy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LearntoFlySurfacesEltonJohn.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ContaktMadcon.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring TPA so user can partake of unblock discussion at WP:AN. Yamla found no CU evidence of recent socking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this opportunity. I would once again like to fully apologize for my actions and hope to move forward by making productive contributions, and abiding by all Wikipedia polices. Greenock125 (talk) 18:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I was unbanned from Wikipedia I would be mainly working on music articles but also I would edit movie and sports articles. Greenock125 (talk) 04:40, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

carrying over -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I was blocked in November 2020, I was asked to answer questions in my own words about copyright to establish if I should be unblocked, but I violated copyright in giving my answers. I should not have done this. If I am unblocked, I will make sure to answer any questions or concerns on my talk page when I receive them. Greenock125 (talk) 20:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

carried over. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:36, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I was answering questions on Copyright, I copied text from the Copyright article and used it in my answers, I should not have done that and answered in my own words. Greenock125 (talk) 20:44, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also I would avoid copyright violations by avoiding long quotations from sources when creating any articles [1]. Greenock125 (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

carred over. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:22, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can use copyrighted content if it is Non-free content and is fair use in US copyright law and complies with the criteria for Non-free content. Greenock125 (talk) 21:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are allowed to use Non-free content in articles only if the usage of the content is considered in United States copyright law and complies with the criteria for Non-free content. Greenock125 (talk) 09:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When creating music articles, I am allowed to use brief quotations of copyrighted text as extensive use of copyrighted quotation text is prohibited. Any changes to quotation text in articles must be marked clearly (e.g. [...]). Greenock125 (talk) 10:10, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

carried over -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I am unblocked and unbanned, I will tackle the lack of communication by stopping any editing, and when an editor comes into my talk page with a concern, question, or warning, I will comment on it, I will not ignore it and make sure I acknowledged that I have read it. Greenock125 (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

carried over -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see my Unblock/Unban request on the Administrators' noticeboard has been archived, what happens now and how do I get unblocked, it feels like I am never getting unblocked and unbanned now, I have waited six months without sockpuppetry or block evasion, I promised to not break copyright rules and respond to messages on my talk page. I don't know what to do. Greenock125 (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merde. I will try to unarchive. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:50, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Thank You. Is there anything else I can do to help me get unblocked and unbanned. Greenock125 (talk) 13:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I knew. Some of these have many great comments and go quickly. Some no one pays attention to. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:53, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it's been almost 12 since my unblock discussion was opened, is there anything I could do to help get me unbanned and unblocked. I have not edited any article on Wikipedia and will never edit any article on Wikipedia while I am banned and blocked. I don't know what to do any help would be much appreciated, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 14:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Greenock125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe this block is no longer necessary because I understand why I was blocked. I broke copyright rules by copying text directly from websites, I would avoid long quotations from sources. Evading my block after it was imposed by abusing multiple accounts, creating another account, and using multiple IP addresses. I admit continuing to keep editing in 2022, I should not have done that and fully apologize for my actions. I promise this will never happen again, make productive contributions, and abide by all Wikipedia polices. I will tackle the lack of communication by stopping any editing, and when an editor comes into my talk page with a concern, question, or warning, I will comment on it, I will not ignore it and make sure I acknowledged that I have read it. What is copyright? It allows the owner the exclusive rights to use their work. When someone creates an original work, fixed in a tangible medium, they automatically own copyright to the work. How is Wikipedia licenced? All content published on Wikipedia is licensed by the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (CC BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL). Why is copyrighted content not allowed on Wikipedia? The database servers for Wikipedia are found in the United States, which means any copyright content published on Wikipedia would infringe US copyright law. Under what circumstances can we use copyrighted content? You are allowed to use Non-free content in articles only if the usage of the content is considered in United States copyright law and complies with the criteria for Non-free content.

Decline reason:

You appear to think you are just blocked. You are not. You've been so problematic that you are now considered banned by community consensus. No admin is permitted to unilerally lift the ban. If you wish to be unbanned, follow the procedure at WP:UNBAN. CU data is still, as of 2024-05-20, showing no evidence of evasion (thank you!). Yamla (talk) 21:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Greenock125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I feel like my ban from Wikipedia should be overturned because I have learned my lessons since my ban was imposed. I evaded my ban after it was imposed by abusing multiple accounts, I should not have done that and fully apologize for my actions. I would avoid copying text directly from websites when creating articles and avoid using long quotations. I would stop editing if someone leaves a message in my talk page, I will make sure to respond to the messege or acknowledge that I have read the message. I understand that I was very problematic in the past, I would like to fully apologise for my actions and promise to conduct myself differently in the future if I am allowed to resume editing. I promise I will never edit another article on Wikipedia until my ban is lifted.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. You are banned; see WP:UNBAN if you wish to contest it. Yamla (talk) 10:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Yamla, you said that there is no private information associated with my appeal. What private information do I need to provide that would help me get unbanned from Wikipedia and you said to post my unblock request to my talk page for administrator review, does that mean using {{unblock}} template. Greenock125 (talk) 10:51, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are confused. Nobody's asking for private information. We are directing you to make your unban request here instead of on UTRS. UTRS is not the right place for it. Please review WP:UNBAN to understand what's required here. --Yamla (talk) 11:08, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I feel like my ban from Wikipedia should be overturned because I have learned my lessons since my ban was imposed. I evaded my ban after it was imposed by abusing multiple accounts, I should not have done that and fully apologize for my actions. I would avoid copying text directly from websites and avoid using long quotations. I would stop editing if someone leaves a message in my talk page and make sure to respond to the messege or acknowledge that I have read the message. I would like to fully apologise for my actions and promise to conduct myself differently in the future if I am allowed to resume editing. I promise I will not edit any article on Wikipedia until my ban is lifted. Would it be possible for this to be reposted to an appropriate discussion board, Thank You. Greenock125 (talk) 11:16, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I've posted my Unban request here on my talk page as I can't use the {{unblock}} template or Unblock Ticket Request System (UTRS). If there is anything missing from my appeal please let me know, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 10:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamla. All I'm asking for is for some help and to say if I'm missing anything from my appeal, I've said lessons I have learned since my ban was imposed and how I would conduct myself differently in the future if I'm allowed to resume editing, I don't know what I'm missing from the appeal. Also you said that nobody's asking for private information, on my UTRS appeal when you declined you said, "As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. You can follow the guide at https://teknopedia.ac.id/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks." I understand that I have been so problematic in the past, I would really like to prove that I have learned my lessons and help contribute to Wikipedia, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 19:17, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla, I don't know what to do anymore, please any help or advice would be much appreciated, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reread WP:UNBAN. This is my last response to you. Don't ping me again. --Yamla (talk) 15:36, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think my ban from Wikipedia should be overturned as I feel I have learned my lessons since my ban was imposed. If I am allowed to resume editing in the future I would avoid breaking copyright violations by not copying text directly from websites and avoid using long quotations especially when creating music articles for singles and albums. If someone leaves a message on my talk page I would respond to the message or acknowledge that I have read the message. Greenock125 (talk) 10:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fully understand why the community consensus is reluctant to unban me from Wikipedia, I fully understand the reasons why, I've been very problematic in the past, not responding to messages on my talk page and not following policies and guidelines especially copyright. And I know this is no excuse but I have Asperger syndrome, which means I have difficulties with communication. I would like to prove that I have learned my lessons from the past and make useful contributions to Wikipedia in the future, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 10:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it feels like no one is taking my unban appeal seriously and I feel like I'm being ignored. I'm not asking anyone to give me the answers, all I'm asking is for some help with my appeal and what is missing from the appeal. I feel like getting unbanned is impossible. Please any help or advice would be much appreciated, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 08:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, would it be possible to be allowed to edit my Sandbox to prove that I can make useful contributions to Wikipedia and that I learned my lesson on copyright. I was wondering if this could help me get unbanned, thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 08:40, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Dido-No-Freedom.png. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 11:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FosterthePeople(EP).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to modify (or remove) declined unblock requests for your currently active block, such as you did here. If you do so again, you will once again have your talk page access revoked. --Yamla (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm sorry for modifying my declined unblock request. I will not do that again. Greenock125 (talk) 11:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Michel van der Horst requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel van der Horst. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SL93 (talk) 23:47, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think my ban from Wikipedia should be overturned as I feel I have learned my lessons since my ban was imposed. If I am allowed to resume editing in the future I would avoid breaking copyright violations by not copying text directly from websites and avoid using long quotations especially when creating music articles for singles and albums. If someone leaves a message on my talk page I would stop editing and I would respond to the message or acknowledge that I have read the message. I would like to fully apologize for my actions and promise to conduct myself differently in the future if I am allowed to resume editing. I promise I will not edit any article on Wikipedia until my ban is lifted. Would it be possible for this to be reposted to an appropriate discussion board, Thank You. Greenock125 (talk) 16:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being really patient here, but it feels like I'm being ignored, and everyone is waiting for me to give up and retire from Wikipedia. All I'm asking for is a response to say what's wrong with my appeal and what's missing from it, and that does not mean giving me the answers. I'm not going anywhere, and I'm not going to be bullied into retirement. I'm sorry, but I feel like it has to be said, Thank you. Greenock125 (talk) 10:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Greenock125 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

RG3789 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

To get help get the account unbanned and unblocked. Greenock125 (talk) 08:54, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. User is no longer interested in being unbanned, nor is this an unban request. Yamla (talk) 10:59, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chris Gilliland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 06:17, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sam Hewson (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C679 06:28, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #91020 is declined. This is the sixteenth UTRS request to be declined and clearly indicates Greenock125 is abusing the process. Greenock125, do not make another UTRS request. Yamla (talk) 10:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please note that I've muted you from my notifications. --Yamla (talk) 10:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You say I'm not interested in being unbanned, that is not true. The truth is, no one is interested in helping me with my unban request or telling me what's wrong with it or if there is anything missing from it. Also, it seems that no one on Wikipedia wants to unban me because of my past, no one wants to give me one last chance to contribute to Wikipedia, so that's why I have given up on getting unbanned. Greenock125 (talk) 14:19, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ellis Rubin (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellis Rubin (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derk Telnekes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Derk Telnekes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 12:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jeffrey Van Egdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 09:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rhys Hayden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 10:00, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Daniel Day (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 10:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kostas Pantelidis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and fails WP:SPORTSCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 10:43, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jeffrey Sparidaans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anca Zijlstra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 13:43, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Sparidaans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Sparidaans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 14:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Michael Meaney (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 13:03, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Justin Hood (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 15:38, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rhys Hayden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhys Hayden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 09:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Paul Coughlin (darts player) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unnotable darts player, fails GNG and WP:SPORTCRIT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 09:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Meaney (darts player) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Meaney (darts player) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

All my warmest wishes, ItsKesha (talk) 15:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]