Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pavel Sukhoi into Sukhoi. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I reverted your change that had replaced most mentions of "T-50" with "Su-57". The terms are not synonyms: T-50 is the name of the prototype (and probably the internal factory designation of the overall design); Su-57 is the name of the final version, which has not yet flown. It's rather analogous to the difference between YF-22 and F-22.

I agree with you that some of the uses of the terms T-50 and PAK FA in the article had become inappropriate & confusing after the aircraft's final designation has been revealed. I made my own attempt to clean them up.

Your contributions are highly welcome, but "replace all" is not the way to go about things. Not unless you look at each replacement individually. — Tetromino (talk) 23:18, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

About this edit: you say that operating income and net income don't appear in the file, so where do your figures come from, given that you're using the same source as me?--eh bien mon prince (talk) 20:15, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for translating and adding the material from the Russian Wikipedia. However, there are two issues which I would like you to address (also in order to not repeat this in the future). First, you copied some templates which are incompatible with ours. If you go to the reference section, you will see a lot of red text indicating that some parameters are not filled in and even some templates do not exist here. Second, the Russian Wikipedia has much lower verifiability standards than we have. I hope you have been careful enough and only translated the text which is based on reliable source; otherwise I would ask you to double-check this. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:42, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Josephua. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western Rapid Diameter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E18 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lukoil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Macedonia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosatom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nuclear energy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Josephua, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Rosatom have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nick Freitas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	hi thanks for your effort to improve Russia-related Wikipedia articles. can you improve Russian-art articles. best regards Ro.faridi (talk) 20:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moscow International Business Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third Ring Road (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eurasia (building), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pool (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Josephua. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alibaba Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sukhoi Su-57 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WelpThatWorked -- WelpThatWorked (talk) 20:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sukhoi Su-57 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sukhoi Su-57 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of WelpThatWorked -- WelpThatWorked (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please discuss before restoring the name to the lead at Christchurch mosque shootings --- Coffeeandcrumbs 05:51, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Coffeeandcrumbs: There is no reason why I should be barred from editing because I re-done the edits after resolving the issue in the talk page. This is a false accusation and I suggest you lower such aggressive behavior. - Josephua (talk) 06:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I meant no ill will. This is the friendliest warning available for WP:3RR. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 06:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not settle disagreements with an accusation of edit warring out of nowhere. I had taken my time to discuss my point of view in the consensus and due to a lack of response, assume you agreed and put back the edits. If you still disagree, talk in the talk page. - Josephua (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits on Sukhoi Superjet 100. You seem to have marked most of them as minor – you might like to take a look at WP:MINOR as the majority of your recent edits do not meet the criteria for being minor. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:22, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Rosbif73:. I thought them as minor because I did not use a lot of my own time as well as editing a small section of an article, but I'll look at WP:Minor. - Josephua (talk) 01:32, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bug you about this, but did you see WP:MINOR#When not to mark as minor changes? Specifically, do not mark as minor any additions or removals of significant content or references. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's a habit. Sorry. However, I'm gradually making edits non-minor gradually so you'll see me not making those mistakes. - Josephua (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Josephua, thanks for the revert of IP user 109.70.252.3's edits you made just now. I was in the process of doing the same thing. I was looking for a source for the text in the second edit, and found that it's a very close paraphrase of this press release: [1] so I think it's not suitable for inclusion. Just thought you might like to know, in case it shows up again. --IamNotU (talk) 15:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Press-releases are good as citations for only sentences, not an entire passage. If you are looking for citations for passages, look to FlightGlobal or RusAviaInsider. They are pretty reliable and fit the requirements of WP:RS. - Josephua (talk) 15:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheremetyevo International Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emirates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:46, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Special administrative regions of China, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Portuguese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not acceptable since it does not preserve the article history. If you want to move the article and think the move is uncontroversial, please use the move function. (In this case, I would expect a RM though). --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: It doesn't work when I tried moving it. I believe the reason is why is that there is a M11 motorway (Russia) article already, but it is redirected to Moscow-Saint Petersburg motorway, which I am trying to reverse. - Josephua (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is quite possible. In this case you can request a speedy deletion, we have a dedicated criterion. The deleting admin may disagree with you, but if the move is truly uncontroversial the page always get deleted.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Plus, I asked for consensus in the talk page a year ago. Nobody responded, so I went with it, believe that RM is not needed. - Josephua (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is fine, but cut-and-paste moves are still not acceptable. Technically speaking, they are license violation.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Alright, but can you find a way to move the article to M11 motorway (Russia), since I have no experience with this part of Wikipedia about moving articles etc.. I also believe it to be better if a redirect was put in place instead of a deletion. - Josephua (talk) 19:42, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Pleae put {{Db-move|page to be moved|reason}} on the redirect page, indicating the reason. Wait until the redirect gets deleted (I will not delete it, somebody else will). The deleting administrator can choose to move the page themselves; otherwise, you will have to move it via the standard interface option. When you move the page, the redirect gets created automatically.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sukhoi Superjet 100 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1.02 editor -- 1.02 editor (talk) 02:40, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sukhoi Superjet 100 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sukhoi Superjet 100 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1.02 editor -- 1.02 editor (talk) 10:40, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sukhoi Superjet 100 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sukhoi Superjet 100 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1.02 editor -- 1.02 editor (talk) 10:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Testing signature - Josephua ^(聊天) 21:36, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Testing signature - 祝好，Josephua ^(聊天) 22:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed, you made a great contribution on translating Yekaterinburg article from Russian. Could you, possibly, make the translation of the city parent region - Sverdlovsk Oblast - too? After finishing the current Shenzhen activities, of course. I have no sufficient proficiency in English nor enough experience in Wikipedia article writing overall, to do it myself. If you are interested, I have a scattered list of the Russian languages articles that can be translated and combined in the Oblast history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cian Akril (talk • contribs) 11:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have reverted my editions on Russia, please see this. Talk:Russia#State_religion.(The Sr Guy (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2020 (UTC))[reply]

@The Sr Guy: I am unable to respond to questions at this time since I’m in a vacation and only have my phone with me. Noticing you made this change, please do a RfC on this edit. I will give a proper response when I finish my trip. - 祝好，Josephua^(聊天) 11:36, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Airbus A350 XWB you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 17:20, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Airbus A350 XWB you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Airbus A350 XWB for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 13:20, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Airbus A350 XWB you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Airbus A350 XWB for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Lizzy150 -- Lizzy150 (talk) 22:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sinoam,

as part of a field experiment for a Cambridge University study, we undertook several edits on various Wikipedia pages over the past months.

You were one of the users reacting to an edit we made, precisely: https://teknopedia.ac.id/w/index.php?title=Gazprom&diff=989176310&oldid=989146139

It would be extremely helpful for our study if you could explain a little bit further why you decided to challenge this edit. Feel free to comment on this talk page or write us an email at WikipediaStudy@web.de.

We are also more than happy to have a short interview of around 15 minutes, in which we would further talk about your general experiences and motivations as a Wikipedia editor. The interviews have received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Cambridge and it will be ensured that you can stay completely anonymous.

We are looking forward to hearing from you soon and are glad to provide more information about the study if you send us an email!

Best wishes,

Vincent 2.247.245.243 (talk) 11:59, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2.247.245.243: My opinion is that of User:Devokewater that it violates WP:SYNTHESIS and WP:LEAD. Please do not put original research here and if you want to edit something, read the guidelines. And no, I do not want to be a part of a survey. - 祝好，Sinoam^(聊天) 01:26, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics of Shenzhen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 08:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shenzhen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2011 Universiade. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I performed a GA reassessment of the Su-57 article based on the GA criteria and found that the article didn't meet those standards. Consequently, the article has been delisted from GA status. In fact, the original GA assessment of the Su-57 didn't seem to actually assess the article in accordance to the criteria listed. Since the the reassessment, I have considerably rewritten the article to improve its quality. Please assess the article in accordance to the GA criteria before nominating it as a GA. Steve7c8 (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bone Tomahawk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dragged Across Concrete, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brawl in Cell Block 99 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 16:01, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brawl in Cell Block 99 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Brawl in Cell Block 99 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 22:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bone Tomahawk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sinoam. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Brawl in Cell Block 99 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! 🌊PacificDepthstalk

🌊PacificDepthstalk|contrib 02:38, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brawl in Cell Block 99 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 18:44, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brawl in Cell Block 99 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brawl in Cell Block 99 and Talk:Brawl in Cell Block 99/GA2 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brawl in Cell Block 99 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brawl in Cell Block 99 for comments about the article, and Talk:Brawl in Cell Block 99/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of An anonymous username, not my real name -- An anonymous username, not my real name (talk) 23:04, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bone Tomahawk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bone Tomahawk and Talk:Bone Tomahawk/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]