Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fathoms Below was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The article needs references to reliable sources to demonstrate that its subject is notable and able to be included in the main article space.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Waterwoods and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fathoms Below (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srihan123! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fathoms Below (talk) 02:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srihan123! Your additions to Horizon Primary School have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srihan123

Your recent contributions to the Geometry Dash article have been reverted, and while these edits have been classified as good faith, it is important to clarify that they are not necessarily bad or incorrect. Your intent to improve the article by making edits reflects a genuine effort to contribute to the accuracy and quality of the Wikipedia community. The process of editing Wikipedia requires a nuanced understanding of guidelines, sourcing, and neutrality, which can take time to fully grasp. Please know that these reversions are part of the collaborative nature of Wikipedia, where multiple editors work together to refine and improve content. We appreciate your enthusiasm and encourage you to continue engaging with the platform, ensuring that all edits are well-sourced and align with Wikipedia's standards of reliability.

Thank you for your valuable contributions, Srihan123. 🐝 B33net 🐝 04:50, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Change of Scene. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Taabii (talk) 10:30, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Change of Scene. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ahmadfaisalsidiqi (talk) 06:33, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. David notMD (talk) 08:04, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reference all content or else delete what cannot be referenced, for example, your own descriptions of game play. Submit the draft for review rather than just converting it to an article. If you do that one more time the draft is likely to be Speedy deleted and your account be temporarily blocked. David notMD (talk) 08:06, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You made me so scared that i'm never editing again AAAAAAAHHHHH Srihan123 (talk) 08:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not my intention. Just please learn about the rules and guidelines. David notMD (talk) 10:10, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Change of Scene and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Change of Scene content is copied from a copyright protected website. Remove all copied content from the draft. See Wikipedia:Copyright violations for why this is important. David notMD (talk) 10:19, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. I had missed the attribution at the bottom that allows for reusing the content verbatim. That said, my opinion is that the Trivia content does not add value to the draft. David notMD (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Srihan123! The thread you created at the Teahouse, 2.2 removal in GD article, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]