Epstein Files Full PDF

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages) This article needs additional or more specific categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (November 2025) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Open formula" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2026) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (November 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

An open formula is a formula that contains at least one free variable.^[1]

An open formula does not have a truth value assigned to it, in contrast with a closed formula which constitutes a proposition and thus can have a truth value like true or false. An open formula can be transformed into a closed formula by applying a quantifier for each free variable. This transformation is called capture of the free variables to make them bound variables.

For example, when reasoning about natural numbers, the formula "x+2 > y" is open, since it contains the free variables x and y. In contrast, the formula "∃y ∀x: x+2 > y" is closed, and has truth value true.

Open formulas are often used in rigorous mathematical definitions of properties, like

"x is an aunt of y if, for some person z, z is a parent of y, and x is a sister of z"

(with free variables x, y, and bound variable z) defining the notion of "aunt" in terms of "parent" and "sister". Another, more formal example, which defines the property of being a prime number, is

"P(x) if ∀m,n∈${\displaystyle \mathbb {N} }$: m>1 ∧ n>1 → x≠ m⋅n",

(with free variable x and bound variables m,n).

An example of a closed formula with truth value false involves the sequence of Fermat numbers

${\displaystyle F_{n}=2^{2^{n}}+1,}$

studied by Fermat in connection to the primality. The attachment of the predicate letter P (is prime) to each number from the Fermat sequence gives a set of closed formulae. While they are true for n = 0,...,4, no larger value of n is known that obtains a true formula, as of 2023^[update]; for example, ${\displaystyle F_{5}=4\,294\,967\,297=641\cdot 6\,700\,417}$ is not a prime. Thus the closed formula ∀n P(F_n) is false.

In database theory, when expressing a query as an open first-order formula, the free variables represent the ones that in an SQL query would occur in the SELECT clause. For example, a formula like:

${\displaystyle \varphi (son)=birthYear(son,2020)\land \exists mom{\textbf {.}}(motherOf(mom,son)\land birthYear(mom,1999))}$

where ${\displaystyle son}$ is the only free variable, could be expressed in SQL as follows:

SELECT y1.person AS son
FROM birth_year y1
WHERE y1.year = 2020
AND EXISTS (
  SELECT *
  FROM mother_of m1
  JOIN birth_year y2 ON m1.mother = y2.person
  WHERE m1.son = y1.person
  AND y2.year = 1999
)

which selects all the people born in 2020 and having a mother born in 1999.

Formally, executing the above SQL query over a database is equivalent to look for all the substitutions ${\displaystyle \sigma }$ of the free variables of ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ with constants such that the Herbrand interpretation of ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {D}}}$ satisfies ${\displaystyle \sigma (\varphi )}$, where ${\displaystyle {\mathcal {D}}}$ is the set of ground atoms representing the database.

• First-order logic
• Higher-order logic
• Quantifier (logic)
• Predicate (mathematical logic)
• Scope (logic)
• Glossary of logic

• Wolfgang Rautenberg (2008), Einführung in die Mathematische Logik (in German) (3. ed.), Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner, ISBN 978-3-8348-0578-2
• H.-P. Tuschik, H. Wolter (2002), Mathematische Logik – kurzgefaßt (in German), Heidelberg: Spektrum, Akad. Verlag, ISBN 3-8274-1387-7